Reward abundance interferes with error-based learning in a visuomotor adaptation task.

The brain rapidly adapts reaching movements to changing circumstances by using visual feedback about errors. Providing reward in addition to error feedback facilitates the adaptation but the underlying mechanism is unknown. Here, we investigate whether the proportion of trials rewarded (the 're...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katinka van der Kooij, Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes, Tessa Rigterink, Krista E Overvliet, Joeren B J Smeets
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5841744?pdf=render
id doaj-e9ddb6624ec142e5a98c7168c02e503f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e9ddb6624ec142e5a98c7168c02e503f2020-11-25T01:28:30ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01133e019300210.1371/journal.pone.0193002Reward abundance interferes with error-based learning in a visuomotor adaptation task.Katinka van der KooijLeonie Oostwoud WijdenesTessa RigterinkKrista E OvervlietJoeren B J SmeetsThe brain rapidly adapts reaching movements to changing circumstances by using visual feedback about errors. Providing reward in addition to error feedback facilitates the adaptation but the underlying mechanism is unknown. Here, we investigate whether the proportion of trials rewarded (the 'reward abundance') influences how much participants adapt to their errors. We used a 3D multi-target pointing task in which reward alone is insufficient for motor adaptation. Participants (N = 423) performed the pointing task with feedback based on a shifted hand-position. On a proportion of trials we gave them rewarding feedback that their hand hit the target. Half of the participants only received this reward feedback. The other half also received feedback about endpoint errors. In different groups, we varied the proportion of trials that was rewarded. As expected, participants who received feedback about their errors did adapt, but participants who only received reward-feedback did not. Critically, participants who received abundant rewards adapted less to their errors than participants who received less reward. Thus, reward abundance negatively influences how much participants learn from their errors. Probably participants used a mechanism that relied more on the reward feedback when the reward was abundant. Because participants could not adapt to the reward, this interfered with adaptation to errors.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5841744?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Katinka van der Kooij
Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes
Tessa Rigterink
Krista E Overvliet
Joeren B J Smeets
spellingShingle Katinka van der Kooij
Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes
Tessa Rigterink
Krista E Overvliet
Joeren B J Smeets
Reward abundance interferes with error-based learning in a visuomotor adaptation task.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Katinka van der Kooij
Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes
Tessa Rigterink
Krista E Overvliet
Joeren B J Smeets
author_sort Katinka van der Kooij
title Reward abundance interferes with error-based learning in a visuomotor adaptation task.
title_short Reward abundance interferes with error-based learning in a visuomotor adaptation task.
title_full Reward abundance interferes with error-based learning in a visuomotor adaptation task.
title_fullStr Reward abundance interferes with error-based learning in a visuomotor adaptation task.
title_full_unstemmed Reward abundance interferes with error-based learning in a visuomotor adaptation task.
title_sort reward abundance interferes with error-based learning in a visuomotor adaptation task.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description The brain rapidly adapts reaching movements to changing circumstances by using visual feedback about errors. Providing reward in addition to error feedback facilitates the adaptation but the underlying mechanism is unknown. Here, we investigate whether the proportion of trials rewarded (the 'reward abundance') influences how much participants adapt to their errors. We used a 3D multi-target pointing task in which reward alone is insufficient for motor adaptation. Participants (N = 423) performed the pointing task with feedback based on a shifted hand-position. On a proportion of trials we gave them rewarding feedback that their hand hit the target. Half of the participants only received this reward feedback. The other half also received feedback about endpoint errors. In different groups, we varied the proportion of trials that was rewarded. As expected, participants who received feedback about their errors did adapt, but participants who only received reward-feedback did not. Critically, participants who received abundant rewards adapted less to their errors than participants who received less reward. Thus, reward abundance negatively influences how much participants learn from their errors. Probably participants used a mechanism that relied more on the reward feedback when the reward was abundant. Because participants could not adapt to the reward, this interfered with adaptation to errors.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5841744?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT katinkavanderkooij rewardabundanceinterfereswitherrorbasedlearninginavisuomotoradaptationtask
AT leonieoostwoudwijdenes rewardabundanceinterfereswitherrorbasedlearninginavisuomotoradaptationtask
AT tessarigterink rewardabundanceinterfereswitherrorbasedlearninginavisuomotoradaptationtask
AT kristaeovervliet rewardabundanceinterfereswitherrorbasedlearninginavisuomotoradaptationtask
AT joerenbjsmeets rewardabundanceinterfereswitherrorbasedlearninginavisuomotoradaptationtask
_version_ 1725101187959619584