Anticipated responses to a hypothetical minimum price for cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco: an online cross-sectional survey with cigarette smokers and ex-smokers in the UK
Objectives As tobacco companies can circumvent tax increases, a minimum retail price per-cigarette/per-gram of roll-your-own tobacco presents an additional mechanism for governments to reduce smoking. We examined (1) anticipated responses to a hypothetical minimum price-per-cigarette/per-gram among...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021-03-01
|
Series: | BMJ Open |
Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/3/e042724.full |
id |
doaj-e9d89d572f524adc97c68cca72683b7c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e9d89d572f524adc97c68cca72683b7c2021-07-02T13:08:19ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552021-03-0111310.1136/bmjopen-2020-042724Anticipated responses to a hypothetical minimum price for cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco: an online cross-sectional survey with cigarette smokers and ex-smokers in the UKJames Crapo0Abhya Gupta1Robert M Mroz2Andrea Ludwig-Sengpiel3Markus Beck4Bérengère Langellier5Carina Ittrich6Frank Risse7Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, USATA Inflammation Med, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Biberach an der Riss, Germany2nd Department of Lung Diseases and Tuberculosis, Bialystok Medical University, Bialystok, PolandKLB Gesundheitsforschung Lübeck GmbH, Lübeck, GermanyDepartment of Clinical Research, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach an der Riss, GermanyDepartment of Medical Affairs, Boehringer Ingelheim France SAS, Paris, FranceGlobal Department of Biostatistics and Data Sciences, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach an der Riss, GermanyDepartment of Translational Medicine and Clinical Pharmacology, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach an der Riss, GermanyObjectives As tobacco companies can circumvent tax increases, a minimum retail price per-cigarette/per-gram of roll-your-own tobacco presents an additional mechanism for governments to reduce smoking. We examined (1) anticipated responses to a hypothetical minimum price-per-cigarette/per-gram among smokers in the UK; (2) what demographic and smoker characteristics are associated with anticipated responses; and (3) whether minimum pricing may help ex-smokers stay quit.Design Cross-sectional survey (May–July 2019).Setting UK.Participants Adult cigarette smokers (n=2412) and ex-smokers (n=700).Main outcome measurements Anticipated responses to a hypothetical minimum price of £10.00 for 20 cigarettes (£0.50 per-cigarette) and £13.50 for 30 grams of roll-your-own tobacco (£0.45 per-gram); approximately £0.10 per-cigarette/per-gram increases on the cheapest prices in leading UK supermarkets (January 2019). Smokers were presented with ten options (eg, ‘Try to quit’) and asked which they would do (Yes/No) and then which they would most likely do. Ex-smokers were asked to what extent the minimum prices would help them stay quit (A lot vs Lesser agreement).Results Among smokers, 55.6% said they would most likely smoke the same amount, 10.7% they would smoke less, 9.5% they would try to quit and 5.8% they would use e-cigarettes more often. Anticipated reactions were associated with demography and smoker characteristics, for example, C2DE (lower social grade) smokers were less likely than ABC1 (higher social grade) smokers to say they would smoke the same as they do now (ORAdj=0.74, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.88). Among ex-smokers, 38.5% said the minimum prices would help them stay quit ‘A lot’, more so among C2DE than ABC1 participants (ORAdj=1.80, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.49).Conclusions In response to a hypothetical minimum price for cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco, approximately a fifth of smokers in the UK indicated they would smoke less or quit and almost two-fifths of ex-smokers indicated the prices would help them stay quit.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/3/e042724.full |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
James Crapo Abhya Gupta Robert M Mroz Andrea Ludwig-Sengpiel Markus Beck Bérengère Langellier Carina Ittrich Frank Risse |
spellingShingle |
James Crapo Abhya Gupta Robert M Mroz Andrea Ludwig-Sengpiel Markus Beck Bérengère Langellier Carina Ittrich Frank Risse Anticipated responses to a hypothetical minimum price for cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco: an online cross-sectional survey with cigarette smokers and ex-smokers in the UK BMJ Open |
author_facet |
James Crapo Abhya Gupta Robert M Mroz Andrea Ludwig-Sengpiel Markus Beck Bérengère Langellier Carina Ittrich Frank Risse |
author_sort |
James Crapo |
title |
Anticipated responses to a hypothetical minimum price for cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco: an online cross-sectional survey with cigarette smokers and ex-smokers in the UK |
title_short |
Anticipated responses to a hypothetical minimum price for cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco: an online cross-sectional survey with cigarette smokers and ex-smokers in the UK |
title_full |
Anticipated responses to a hypothetical minimum price for cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco: an online cross-sectional survey with cigarette smokers and ex-smokers in the UK |
title_fullStr |
Anticipated responses to a hypothetical minimum price for cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco: an online cross-sectional survey with cigarette smokers and ex-smokers in the UK |
title_full_unstemmed |
Anticipated responses to a hypothetical minimum price for cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco: an online cross-sectional survey with cigarette smokers and ex-smokers in the UK |
title_sort |
anticipated responses to a hypothetical minimum price for cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco: an online cross-sectional survey with cigarette smokers and ex-smokers in the uk |
publisher |
BMJ Publishing Group |
series |
BMJ Open |
issn |
2044-6055 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
Objectives As tobacco companies can circumvent tax increases, a minimum retail price per-cigarette/per-gram of roll-your-own tobacco presents an additional mechanism for governments to reduce smoking. We examined (1) anticipated responses to a hypothetical minimum price-per-cigarette/per-gram among smokers in the UK; (2) what demographic and smoker characteristics are associated with anticipated responses; and (3) whether minimum pricing may help ex-smokers stay quit.Design Cross-sectional survey (May–July 2019).Setting UK.Participants Adult cigarette smokers (n=2412) and ex-smokers (n=700).Main outcome measurements Anticipated responses to a hypothetical minimum price of £10.00 for 20 cigarettes (£0.50 per-cigarette) and £13.50 for 30 grams of roll-your-own tobacco (£0.45 per-gram); approximately £0.10 per-cigarette/per-gram increases on the cheapest prices in leading UK supermarkets (January 2019). Smokers were presented with ten options (eg, ‘Try to quit’) and asked which they would do (Yes/No) and then which they would most likely do. Ex-smokers were asked to what extent the minimum prices would help them stay quit (A lot vs Lesser agreement).Results Among smokers, 55.6% said they would most likely smoke the same amount, 10.7% they would smoke less, 9.5% they would try to quit and 5.8% they would use e-cigarettes more often. Anticipated reactions were associated with demography and smoker characteristics, for example, C2DE (lower social grade) smokers were less likely than ABC1 (higher social grade) smokers to say they would smoke the same as they do now (ORAdj=0.74, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.88). Among ex-smokers, 38.5% said the minimum prices would help them stay quit ‘A lot’, more so among C2DE than ABC1 participants (ORAdj=1.80, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.49).Conclusions In response to a hypothetical minimum price for cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco, approximately a fifth of smokers in the UK indicated they would smoke less or quit and almost two-fifths of ex-smokers indicated the prices would help them stay quit. |
url |
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/3/e042724.full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jamescrapo anticipatedresponsestoahypotheticalminimumpriceforcigarettesandrollyourowntobaccoanonlinecrosssectionalsurveywithcigarettesmokersandexsmokersintheuk AT abhyagupta anticipatedresponsestoahypotheticalminimumpriceforcigarettesandrollyourowntobaccoanonlinecrosssectionalsurveywithcigarettesmokersandexsmokersintheuk AT robertmmroz anticipatedresponsestoahypotheticalminimumpriceforcigarettesandrollyourowntobaccoanonlinecrosssectionalsurveywithcigarettesmokersandexsmokersintheuk AT andrealudwigsengpiel anticipatedresponsestoahypotheticalminimumpriceforcigarettesandrollyourowntobaccoanonlinecrosssectionalsurveywithcigarettesmokersandexsmokersintheuk AT markusbeck anticipatedresponsestoahypotheticalminimumpriceforcigarettesandrollyourowntobaccoanonlinecrosssectionalsurveywithcigarettesmokersandexsmokersintheuk AT berengerelangellier anticipatedresponsestoahypotheticalminimumpriceforcigarettesandrollyourowntobaccoanonlinecrosssectionalsurveywithcigarettesmokersandexsmokersintheuk AT carinaittrich anticipatedresponsestoahypotheticalminimumpriceforcigarettesandrollyourowntobaccoanonlinecrosssectionalsurveywithcigarettesmokersandexsmokersintheuk AT frankrisse anticipatedresponsestoahypotheticalminimumpriceforcigarettesandrollyourowntobaccoanonlinecrosssectionalsurveywithcigarettesmokersandexsmokersintheuk |
_version_ |
1721329281104084992 |