Optimization of control performance on CO2 removal in subang field using model predictive control

A model predictive control (MPC) is used to optimize the control performance on CO2 removal in Subang Field. MPC is implemented to control the feed gas pressure (PIC-1101), amine flow rate (FIC-1102), and makeup water flowrate (FIC-1103) to maintain CO2 concentration in sweet gas. MPC is built using...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wahid Abdul, Wiranoto Yoga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2018-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20186701028
id doaj-e9d21bdbc6894f68acf6165b7df9865f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e9d21bdbc6894f68acf6165b7df9865f2021-02-02T01:37:55ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422018-01-01670102810.1051/e3sconf/20186701028e3sconf_i-trec2018_01028Optimization of control performance on CO2 removal in subang field using model predictive controlWahid AbdulWiranoto YogaA model predictive control (MPC) is used to optimize the control performance on CO2 removal in Subang Field. MPC is implemented to control the feed gas pressure (PIC-1101), amine flow rate (FIC-1102), and makeup water flowrate (FIC-1103) to maintain CO2 concentration in sweet gas. MPC is built using the first-order plus dead time (FOPDT) models. The control performance tests are used set point (SP) tracking and disturbance rejection with the performance indicator is the integral of square error (ISE). The result show that the optimum setting of prediction horizon (P), horizon (M) and Time Sampling (T) in MPC are 9 1, 32 and 1 on PIC-1101; 34, 10 and 5 on FIC-1102 and 40, 10 and 5 on FIC-1103. Based on ISE values, the use of MPC can improve performance for set point tracking by 14.02% in PIC-1101, 76.74% in FIC-1102, and 16.31% in FIC-1103, the use of MPC can improve performance for disturbance rejection by 19.32% in FIC-1102, and 91.57% in FIC-1103, compared with the proportional-integral (PI) controller that used in the field.https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20186701028
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wahid Abdul
Wiranoto Yoga
spellingShingle Wahid Abdul
Wiranoto Yoga
Optimization of control performance on CO2 removal in subang field using model predictive control
E3S Web of Conferences
author_facet Wahid Abdul
Wiranoto Yoga
author_sort Wahid Abdul
title Optimization of control performance on CO2 removal in subang field using model predictive control
title_short Optimization of control performance on CO2 removal in subang field using model predictive control
title_full Optimization of control performance on CO2 removal in subang field using model predictive control
title_fullStr Optimization of control performance on CO2 removal in subang field using model predictive control
title_full_unstemmed Optimization of control performance on CO2 removal in subang field using model predictive control
title_sort optimization of control performance on co2 removal in subang field using model predictive control
publisher EDP Sciences
series E3S Web of Conferences
issn 2267-1242
publishDate 2018-01-01
description A model predictive control (MPC) is used to optimize the control performance on CO2 removal in Subang Field. MPC is implemented to control the feed gas pressure (PIC-1101), amine flow rate (FIC-1102), and makeup water flowrate (FIC-1103) to maintain CO2 concentration in sweet gas. MPC is built using the first-order plus dead time (FOPDT) models. The control performance tests are used set point (SP) tracking and disturbance rejection with the performance indicator is the integral of square error (ISE). The result show that the optimum setting of prediction horizon (P), horizon (M) and Time Sampling (T) in MPC are 9 1, 32 and 1 on PIC-1101; 34, 10 and 5 on FIC-1102 and 40, 10 and 5 on FIC-1103. Based on ISE values, the use of MPC can improve performance for set point tracking by 14.02% in PIC-1101, 76.74% in FIC-1102, and 16.31% in FIC-1103, the use of MPC can improve performance for disturbance rejection by 19.32% in FIC-1102, and 91.57% in FIC-1103, compared with the proportional-integral (PI) controller that used in the field.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20186701028
work_keys_str_mv AT wahidabdul optimizationofcontrolperformanceonco2removalinsubangfieldusingmodelpredictivecontrol
AT wiranotoyoga optimizationofcontrolperformanceonco2removalinsubangfieldusingmodelpredictivecontrol
_version_ 1724311420054536192