Truth of Theoretical Identity Statements in Natural Sciences

This article is aimed to rephrase and critique the arguments presented by Joseph LaPorte about the truth of theoretical identity statements in natural sciences. LaPorte is classified as an essentialist who accepts the real kinds, but he denies the essence of the kinds to be discovered. His arguments...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mahmoud Mokhtari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Tabriz 2017-07-01
Series:Philosophical Investigations
Subjects:
Online Access:http://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_6466_en.html
id doaj-e9bf85e2214d4908a8f730bb2a2e425b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e9bf85e2214d4908a8f730bb2a2e425b2020-11-25T00:19:05ZengUniversity of TabrizPhilosophical Investigations2251-79602423-44192017-07-011120231248Truth of Theoretical Identity Statements in Natural SciencesMahmoud Mokhtari0Assistant professor, Shahid Beheshti UniversityThis article is aimed to rephrase and critique the arguments presented by Joseph LaPorte about the truth of theoretical identity statements in natural sciences. LaPorte is classified as an essentialist who accepts the real kinds, but he denies the essence of the kinds to be discovered. His arguments are based on the vagueness of the terms of kinds. In his view while science progress we convention (not discover) what is related to the kinds. I evaluate LaPorte's arguments and show they can be applied only for the border terms in scientific theories and so the generalization of the claim is not defensible. http://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_6466_en.htmlEssentialismNatural KindsIdentity StatementsKripkePutnamLaPorte
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mahmoud Mokhtari
spellingShingle Mahmoud Mokhtari
Truth of Theoretical Identity Statements in Natural Sciences
Philosophical Investigations
Essentialism
Natural Kinds
Identity Statements
Kripke
Putnam
LaPorte
author_facet Mahmoud Mokhtari
author_sort Mahmoud Mokhtari
title Truth of Theoretical Identity Statements in Natural Sciences
title_short Truth of Theoretical Identity Statements in Natural Sciences
title_full Truth of Theoretical Identity Statements in Natural Sciences
title_fullStr Truth of Theoretical Identity Statements in Natural Sciences
title_full_unstemmed Truth of Theoretical Identity Statements in Natural Sciences
title_sort truth of theoretical identity statements in natural sciences
publisher University of Tabriz
series Philosophical Investigations
issn 2251-7960
2423-4419
publishDate 2017-07-01
description This article is aimed to rephrase and critique the arguments presented by Joseph LaPorte about the truth of theoretical identity statements in natural sciences. LaPorte is classified as an essentialist who accepts the real kinds, but he denies the essence of the kinds to be discovered. His arguments are based on the vagueness of the terms of kinds. In his view while science progress we convention (not discover) what is related to the kinds. I evaluate LaPorte's arguments and show they can be applied only for the border terms in scientific theories and so the generalization of the claim is not defensible.
topic Essentialism
Natural Kinds
Identity Statements
Kripke
Putnam
LaPorte
url http://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_6466_en.html
work_keys_str_mv AT mahmoudmokhtari truthoftheoreticalidentitystatementsinnaturalsciences
_version_ 1725373490217877504