Comparing the performance of different stream classification systems using aquatic macroinvertebrates

AIM: We evaluated five stream classification systems observing: 1) differences in richness, abundance and macroinvertebrates communities among stream classes within classification systems; and 2) whether classification systems present better performance using macroinvertebrates. Additionally, we eva...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Márlon de Castro Vasconcelos, Adriano Sanches Melo, Albano Schwarzbold
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associação Brasileira de Limnologia 2013-12-01
Series:Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-975X2013000400006&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-e9bcc7c958e54f87a712d96d7f4a5193
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e9bcc7c958e54f87a712d96d7f4a51932020-11-25T01:03:05ZengAssociação Brasileira de LimnologiaActa Limnologica Brasiliensia2179-975X2013-12-0125440641710.1590/S2179-975X2013000400006S2179-975X2013000400006Comparing the performance of different stream classification systems using aquatic macroinvertebratesMárlon de Castro Vasconcelos0Adriano Sanches Melo1Albano Schwarzbold2Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulAIM: We evaluated five stream classification systems observing: 1) differences in richness, abundance and macroinvertebrates communities among stream classes within classification systems; and 2) whether classification systems present better performance using macroinvertebrates. Additionally, we evaluated the effects of taxonomic resolution and data type (abundance and presence) on results. METHODS: Five stream classification systems were used, two based on hydroregions, one based on ecoregions by FEOW, a fourth one based on stream orders and the last one based on clusters of environment variables sampled in 37 streams at Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil. We used a randomization test to evaluate differences of richness and abundance, a db-MANOVA to evaluate the differences of species assemblages and Classification Strength (CS) to evaluate the classifications performance. RESULTS: There were differences of richness and abundance among stream classes within each stream classification. The same result was found for community data, except for stream order classifications in family level. We observed that stream classes obtained for each stream classification differed in terms of environment variables (db-MANOVA). The classification based on environment variables showed higher CS values than other classification systems. The taxonomic resolution was important to the observed results. Data on genera level presented CS values 12% higher than family level for cluster classification, and the data type was dependent on the classification system and taxonomic resolution employed. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that classifications based on cluster of environment variables was better than other stream classification systems, and similar results using genera level can be obtained for management programs using family resolution in a geographical context similar to this study.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-975X2013000400006&lng=en&tlng=enclassificação ambientalforça de classificaçãoMRPPhidrorregiõesambientes tropicais
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Márlon de Castro Vasconcelos
Adriano Sanches Melo
Albano Schwarzbold
spellingShingle Márlon de Castro Vasconcelos
Adriano Sanches Melo
Albano Schwarzbold
Comparing the performance of different stream classification systems using aquatic macroinvertebrates
Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia
classificação ambiental
força de classificação
MRPP
hidrorregiões
ambientes tropicais
author_facet Márlon de Castro Vasconcelos
Adriano Sanches Melo
Albano Schwarzbold
author_sort Márlon de Castro Vasconcelos
title Comparing the performance of different stream classification systems using aquatic macroinvertebrates
title_short Comparing the performance of different stream classification systems using aquatic macroinvertebrates
title_full Comparing the performance of different stream classification systems using aquatic macroinvertebrates
title_fullStr Comparing the performance of different stream classification systems using aquatic macroinvertebrates
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the performance of different stream classification systems using aquatic macroinvertebrates
title_sort comparing the performance of different stream classification systems using aquatic macroinvertebrates
publisher Associação Brasileira de Limnologia
series Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia
issn 2179-975X
publishDate 2013-12-01
description AIM: We evaluated five stream classification systems observing: 1) differences in richness, abundance and macroinvertebrates communities among stream classes within classification systems; and 2) whether classification systems present better performance using macroinvertebrates. Additionally, we evaluated the effects of taxonomic resolution and data type (abundance and presence) on results. METHODS: Five stream classification systems were used, two based on hydroregions, one based on ecoregions by FEOW, a fourth one based on stream orders and the last one based on clusters of environment variables sampled in 37 streams at Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil. We used a randomization test to evaluate differences of richness and abundance, a db-MANOVA to evaluate the differences of species assemblages and Classification Strength (CS) to evaluate the classifications performance. RESULTS: There were differences of richness and abundance among stream classes within each stream classification. The same result was found for community data, except for stream order classifications in family level. We observed that stream classes obtained for each stream classification differed in terms of environment variables (db-MANOVA). The classification based on environment variables showed higher CS values than other classification systems. The taxonomic resolution was important to the observed results. Data on genera level presented CS values 12% higher than family level for cluster classification, and the data type was dependent on the classification system and taxonomic resolution employed. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that classifications based on cluster of environment variables was better than other stream classification systems, and similar results using genera level can be obtained for management programs using family resolution in a geographical context similar to this study.
topic classificação ambiental
força de classificação
MRPP
hidrorregiões
ambientes tropicais
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-975X2013000400006&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT marlondecastrovasconcelos comparingtheperformanceofdifferentstreamclassificationsystemsusingaquaticmacroinvertebrates
AT adrianosanchesmelo comparingtheperformanceofdifferentstreamclassificationsystemsusingaquaticmacroinvertebrates
AT albanoschwarzbold comparingtheperformanceofdifferentstreamclassificationsystemsusingaquaticmacroinvertebrates
_version_ 1725202513699799040