Comparing the performance of different stream classification systems using aquatic macroinvertebrates
AIM: We evaluated five stream classification systems observing: 1) differences in richness, abundance and macroinvertebrates communities among stream classes within classification systems; and 2) whether classification systems present better performance using macroinvertebrates. Additionally, we eva...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Associação Brasileira de Limnologia
2013-12-01
|
Series: | Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-975X2013000400006&lng=en&tlng=en |
id |
doaj-e9bcc7c958e54f87a712d96d7f4a5193 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e9bcc7c958e54f87a712d96d7f4a51932020-11-25T01:03:05ZengAssociação Brasileira de LimnologiaActa Limnologica Brasiliensia2179-975X2013-12-0125440641710.1590/S2179-975X2013000400006S2179-975X2013000400006Comparing the performance of different stream classification systems using aquatic macroinvertebratesMárlon de Castro Vasconcelos0Adriano Sanches Melo1Albano Schwarzbold2Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulAIM: We evaluated five stream classification systems observing: 1) differences in richness, abundance and macroinvertebrates communities among stream classes within classification systems; and 2) whether classification systems present better performance using macroinvertebrates. Additionally, we evaluated the effects of taxonomic resolution and data type (abundance and presence) on results. METHODS: Five stream classification systems were used, two based on hydroregions, one based on ecoregions by FEOW, a fourth one based on stream orders and the last one based on clusters of environment variables sampled in 37 streams at Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil. We used a randomization test to evaluate differences of richness and abundance, a db-MANOVA to evaluate the differences of species assemblages and Classification Strength (CS) to evaluate the classifications performance. RESULTS: There were differences of richness and abundance among stream classes within each stream classification. The same result was found for community data, except for stream order classifications in family level. We observed that stream classes obtained for each stream classification differed in terms of environment variables (db-MANOVA). The classification based on environment variables showed higher CS values than other classification systems. The taxonomic resolution was important to the observed results. Data on genera level presented CS values 12% higher than family level for cluster classification, and the data type was dependent on the classification system and taxonomic resolution employed. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that classifications based on cluster of environment variables was better than other stream classification systems, and similar results using genera level can be obtained for management programs using family resolution in a geographical context similar to this study.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-975X2013000400006&lng=en&tlng=enclassificação ambientalforça de classificaçãoMRPPhidrorregiõesambientes tropicais |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Márlon de Castro Vasconcelos Adriano Sanches Melo Albano Schwarzbold |
spellingShingle |
Márlon de Castro Vasconcelos Adriano Sanches Melo Albano Schwarzbold Comparing the performance of different stream classification systems using aquatic macroinvertebrates Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia classificação ambiental força de classificação MRPP hidrorregiões ambientes tropicais |
author_facet |
Márlon de Castro Vasconcelos Adriano Sanches Melo Albano Schwarzbold |
author_sort |
Márlon de Castro Vasconcelos |
title |
Comparing the performance of different stream classification systems using aquatic macroinvertebrates |
title_short |
Comparing the performance of different stream classification systems using aquatic macroinvertebrates |
title_full |
Comparing the performance of different stream classification systems using aquatic macroinvertebrates |
title_fullStr |
Comparing the performance of different stream classification systems using aquatic macroinvertebrates |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing the performance of different stream classification systems using aquatic macroinvertebrates |
title_sort |
comparing the performance of different stream classification systems using aquatic macroinvertebrates |
publisher |
Associação Brasileira de Limnologia |
series |
Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia |
issn |
2179-975X |
publishDate |
2013-12-01 |
description |
AIM: We evaluated five stream classification systems observing: 1) differences in richness, abundance and macroinvertebrates communities among stream classes within classification systems; and 2) whether classification systems present better performance using macroinvertebrates. Additionally, we evaluated the effects of taxonomic resolution and data type (abundance and presence) on results. METHODS: Five stream classification systems were used, two based on hydroregions, one based on ecoregions by FEOW, a fourth one based on stream orders and the last one based on clusters of environment variables sampled in 37 streams at Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil. We used a randomization test to evaluate differences of richness and abundance, a db-MANOVA to evaluate the differences of species assemblages and Classification Strength (CS) to evaluate the classifications performance. RESULTS: There were differences of richness and abundance among stream classes within each stream classification. The same result was found for community data, except for stream order classifications in family level. We observed that stream classes obtained for each stream classification differed in terms of environment variables (db-MANOVA). The classification based on environment variables showed higher CS values than other classification systems. The taxonomic resolution was important to the observed results. Data on genera level presented CS values 12% higher than family level for cluster classification, and the data type was dependent on the classification system and taxonomic resolution employed. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that classifications based on cluster of environment variables was better than other stream classification systems, and similar results using genera level can be obtained for management programs using family resolution in a geographical context similar to this study. |
topic |
classificação ambiental força de classificação MRPP hidrorregiões ambientes tropicais |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-975X2013000400006&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marlondecastrovasconcelos comparingtheperformanceofdifferentstreamclassificationsystemsusingaquaticmacroinvertebrates AT adrianosanchesmelo comparingtheperformanceofdifferentstreamclassificationsystemsusingaquaticmacroinvertebrates AT albanoschwarzbold comparingtheperformanceofdifferentstreamclassificationsystemsusingaquaticmacroinvertebrates |
_version_ |
1725202513699799040 |