Liquidity Risk Exposure in Islamic and Conventional Banks

<h1>This research aims to identify the factors influencing the ability of Islamic Banks (IB) and Conventional Banks (CB) to manage liquidity risk; determine the effects of the global financial crisis on Islamic and conventional banks, and propose some mechanisms to improve resilience against l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Osama Omar Jaara, Bassam Omar Jaara, Jamal Shamieh, Usama Adnan Fendi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EconJournals 2017-12-01
Series:International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues
Online Access:https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/5504
id doaj-e9b2eb5a6ede4b3e88699e2325606f30
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e9b2eb5a6ede4b3e88699e2325606f302020-11-25T02:53:07ZengEconJournalsInternational Journal of Economics and Financial Issues2146-41382017-12-017616262993Liquidity Risk Exposure in Islamic and Conventional BanksOsama Omar JaaraBassam Omar JaaraJamal ShamiehUsama Adnan Fendi<h1>This research aims to identify the factors influencing the ability of Islamic Banks (IB) and Conventional Banks (CB) to manage liquidity risk; determine the effects of the global financial crisis on Islamic and conventional banks, and propose some mechanisms to improve resilience against liquidity risk. Univariate and panel regression analyses were used. This was made by highlighting the factors affecting Liquidity Risk Exposure (LRE) in relation to a cross-country sample that utilises both accounting and economic data. 204 banks were investigated in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, as well as South-Eastern Asian (SEA) countries during 2005-2012. Results revealed that IB recorded the highest average Liquidity Risk (LR) exposure compared to CB. There are significant differences between IB and CB banks in terms of LR factors. It is found that 92% of LR exposures are instigated by financial crises, banks’ gearing, gross domestic product (GDP), off-balance sheet items, total securities held by the banks, non-earning assets divided by total assets for banks and liquid assets in CB.</h1><p><strong style="font-size: 2em;">Keywords:</strong><span style="font-size: 2em;"> Liquidity Risk, Islamic banks, Risk management.</span></p><p><strong>JEL Classification:</strong> G32</p>https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/5504
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Osama Omar Jaara
Bassam Omar Jaara
Jamal Shamieh
Usama Adnan Fendi
spellingShingle Osama Omar Jaara
Bassam Omar Jaara
Jamal Shamieh
Usama Adnan Fendi
Liquidity Risk Exposure in Islamic and Conventional Banks
International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues
author_facet Osama Omar Jaara
Bassam Omar Jaara
Jamal Shamieh
Usama Adnan Fendi
author_sort Osama Omar Jaara
title Liquidity Risk Exposure in Islamic and Conventional Banks
title_short Liquidity Risk Exposure in Islamic and Conventional Banks
title_full Liquidity Risk Exposure in Islamic and Conventional Banks
title_fullStr Liquidity Risk Exposure in Islamic and Conventional Banks
title_full_unstemmed Liquidity Risk Exposure in Islamic and Conventional Banks
title_sort liquidity risk exposure in islamic and conventional banks
publisher EconJournals
series International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues
issn 2146-4138
publishDate 2017-12-01
description <h1>This research aims to identify the factors influencing the ability of Islamic Banks (IB) and Conventional Banks (CB) to manage liquidity risk; determine the effects of the global financial crisis on Islamic and conventional banks, and propose some mechanisms to improve resilience against liquidity risk. Univariate and panel regression analyses were used. This was made by highlighting the factors affecting Liquidity Risk Exposure (LRE) in relation to a cross-country sample that utilises both accounting and economic data. 204 banks were investigated in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, as well as South-Eastern Asian (SEA) countries during 2005-2012. Results revealed that IB recorded the highest average Liquidity Risk (LR) exposure compared to CB. There are significant differences between IB and CB banks in terms of LR factors. It is found that 92% of LR exposures are instigated by financial crises, banks’ gearing, gross domestic product (GDP), off-balance sheet items, total securities held by the banks, non-earning assets divided by total assets for banks and liquid assets in CB.</h1><p><strong style="font-size: 2em;">Keywords:</strong><span style="font-size: 2em;"> Liquidity Risk, Islamic banks, Risk management.</span></p><p><strong>JEL Classification:</strong> G32</p>
url https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/5504
work_keys_str_mv AT osamaomarjaara liquidityriskexposureinislamicandconventionalbanks
AT bassamomarjaara liquidityriskexposureinislamicandconventionalbanks
AT jamalshamieh liquidityriskexposureinislamicandconventionalbanks
AT usamaadnanfendi liquidityriskexposureinislamicandconventionalbanks
_version_ 1724726610799624192