Post-operative effectiveness of continuous wound infiltration, continuous epidural infusion and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia on post-operative pain management in patients undergoing spinal surgery

Background and Aims: Very few studies have compared continuous wound infiltration (CWI), continuous epidural infusion (CEI) and intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) with morphine in spine surgery. This study compared these modalities in patients undergoing microdissectomy. Methods: This...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anshuman Singh, Parul Jindal, Gurjeet Khurana, Ranjeet Kumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2017-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2017;volume=61;issue=7;spage=562;epage=569;aulast=Singh
id doaj-e9a4d017d74a478b81fbad6b12010e48
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e9a4d017d74a478b81fbad6b12010e482020-11-25T00:52:30ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Anaesthesia0019-50490976-28172017-01-0161756256910.4103/ija.IJA_684_16Post-operative effectiveness of continuous wound infiltration, continuous epidural infusion and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia on post-operative pain management in patients undergoing spinal surgeryAnshuman SinghParul JindalGurjeet KhuranaRanjeet KumarBackground and Aims: Very few studies have compared continuous wound infiltration (CWI), continuous epidural infusion (CEI) and intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) with morphine in spine surgery. This study compared these modalities in patients undergoing microdissectomy. Methods: This prospective, randomized control trial was conducted on 75 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status I or II undergoing microdiscectomy. Patients in all the three groups received morphine 1 mg IV, with a lockout period of 10 min after each bolus, and the maximum allowed dose was 15 mg/5 h postoperatively. Patients in Group A received CWI with 0.25% levobupivacaine 20 mL as bolus after extubation followed by infusion at 5 mL/h. Group B received CEI with 0.25% levobupivacaine at 5 mL/h. Patients in Group C received intravenous (IV) morphine by PCA pump only. The primary end points were static and dynamic visual analogue scores (VAS) and postoperative pain scores. Secondary observations were postoperative morphine consumption at 8 h, 24 h and 48 h, and patient satisfaction. Results: Group A showed greater analgesic effects at 12 h (P < 0.02), 24 h (P < 0.03), 36 h (P < 0.008) and 48 h (P < 0.007) when compared to the other two techniques, as pain scores were less in group A as compared to group B and C. The requirement of postoperative intravenous morphine (mg) was 18 ± 12.82, 22.92 ± 9.88, 41.56 ± 8.83 for groups A, B and C after 48 h (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Continuous wound infiltration is an effective postoperative pain control technique with minimal side effects, after spinal surgery.http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2017;volume=61;issue=7;spage=562;epage=569;aulast=SinghContinuous wound infiltrationepidural analgesiapatient-controlled analgesiasurgeryspine
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anshuman Singh
Parul Jindal
Gurjeet Khurana
Ranjeet Kumar
spellingShingle Anshuman Singh
Parul Jindal
Gurjeet Khurana
Ranjeet Kumar
Post-operative effectiveness of continuous wound infiltration, continuous epidural infusion and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia on post-operative pain management in patients undergoing spinal surgery
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
Continuous wound infiltration
epidural analgesia
patient-controlled analgesia
surgery
spine
author_facet Anshuman Singh
Parul Jindal
Gurjeet Khurana
Ranjeet Kumar
author_sort Anshuman Singh
title Post-operative effectiveness of continuous wound infiltration, continuous epidural infusion and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia on post-operative pain management in patients undergoing spinal surgery
title_short Post-operative effectiveness of continuous wound infiltration, continuous epidural infusion and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia on post-operative pain management in patients undergoing spinal surgery
title_full Post-operative effectiveness of continuous wound infiltration, continuous epidural infusion and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia on post-operative pain management in patients undergoing spinal surgery
title_fullStr Post-operative effectiveness of continuous wound infiltration, continuous epidural infusion and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia on post-operative pain management in patients undergoing spinal surgery
title_full_unstemmed Post-operative effectiveness of continuous wound infiltration, continuous epidural infusion and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia on post-operative pain management in patients undergoing spinal surgery
title_sort post-operative effectiveness of continuous wound infiltration, continuous epidural infusion and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia on post-operative pain management in patients undergoing spinal surgery
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
issn 0019-5049
0976-2817
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Background and Aims: Very few studies have compared continuous wound infiltration (CWI), continuous epidural infusion (CEI) and intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) with morphine in spine surgery. This study compared these modalities in patients undergoing microdissectomy. Methods: This prospective, randomized control trial was conducted on 75 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status I or II undergoing microdiscectomy. Patients in all the three groups received morphine 1 mg IV, with a lockout period of 10 min after each bolus, and the maximum allowed dose was 15 mg/5 h postoperatively. Patients in Group A received CWI with 0.25% levobupivacaine 20 mL as bolus after extubation followed by infusion at 5 mL/h. Group B received CEI with 0.25% levobupivacaine at 5 mL/h. Patients in Group C received intravenous (IV) morphine by PCA pump only. The primary end points were static and dynamic visual analogue scores (VAS) and postoperative pain scores. Secondary observations were postoperative morphine consumption at 8 h, 24 h and 48 h, and patient satisfaction. Results: Group A showed greater analgesic effects at 12 h (P < 0.02), 24 h (P < 0.03), 36 h (P < 0.008) and 48 h (P < 0.007) when compared to the other two techniques, as pain scores were less in group A as compared to group B and C. The requirement of postoperative intravenous morphine (mg) was 18 ± 12.82, 22.92 ± 9.88, 41.56 ± 8.83 for groups A, B and C after 48 h (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Continuous wound infiltration is an effective postoperative pain control technique with minimal side effects, after spinal surgery.
topic Continuous wound infiltration
epidural analgesia
patient-controlled analgesia
surgery
spine
url http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2017;volume=61;issue=7;spage=562;epage=569;aulast=Singh
work_keys_str_mv AT anshumansingh postoperativeeffectivenessofcontinuouswoundinfiltrationcontinuousepiduralinfusionandintravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesiaonpostoperativepainmanagementinpatientsundergoingspinalsurgery
AT paruljindal postoperativeeffectivenessofcontinuouswoundinfiltrationcontinuousepiduralinfusionandintravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesiaonpostoperativepainmanagementinpatientsundergoingspinalsurgery
AT gurjeetkhurana postoperativeeffectivenessofcontinuouswoundinfiltrationcontinuousepiduralinfusionandintravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesiaonpostoperativepainmanagementinpatientsundergoingspinalsurgery
AT ranjeetkumar postoperativeeffectivenessofcontinuouswoundinfiltrationcontinuousepiduralinfusionandintravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesiaonpostoperativepainmanagementinpatientsundergoingspinalsurgery
_version_ 1725242152252866560