Why managing sciatica is difficult: patients’ experiences of an NHS sciatica pathway. A qualitative, interpretative study

Objectives Amid a political agenda for integrated, high-value care, the UK is implementing its Low Back and Radicular Pain Pathway. To align care with need, it is imperative to understand the patients’ perspective. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to explore how people experience being mana...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Clare Ryan, Catherine J Pope, Lisa Roberts
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-06-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/6/e037157.full
id doaj-e99e734445b14fea94432b5759e22a06
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e99e734445b14fea94432b5759e22a062021-03-13T09:30:20ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-06-0110610.1136/bmjopen-2020-037157Why managing sciatica is difficult: patients’ experiences of an NHS sciatica pathway. A qualitative, interpretative studyClare Ryan0Catherine J Pope1Lisa Roberts2Physiotherapy Service, Solent NHS Trust, Portsmouth, Hampshire, UKNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UKSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UKObjectives Amid a political agenda for integrated, high-value care, the UK is implementing its Low Back and Radicular Pain Pathway. To align care with need, it is imperative to understand the patients’ perspective. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to explore how people experience being managed for sciatica within an National Health Service (NHS) pathway.Design Qualitative interpretative study.Setting Musculoskeletal Service in an NHS, Primary Care Trust, UK.Participants The sample comprised 14 people aged ≥18 years with a clinical presentation of sciatica, who were currently under the care of a specialist physiotherapist (the specialist spinal triage practitioner), had undergone investigations (MRI) and received the results within the past 6 weeks. People were excluded if they had previously undergone spinal surgery or if the suspected cause of symptoms was cauda equina syndrome or sinister pathology. Participants were sampled purposively for variation in age and gender. Data were collected using individual semi-structured interviews (duration: 38–117 min; median: 82.6 min), which were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed thematically.Results A series of problems with the local pathway (insufficient transparency and information; clinician-led decisions; standardised management; restricted access to specialist care; and a lack of collaboration between services) made it difficult for patients to access the management they perceived necessary. Patients were therefore required to be independent and proactive or have agency. This was, however, difficult to achieve (due to the impact of sciatica and because patients lacked the necessary skills, funds and support) and together with the pathway issues, this negated patients’ capability to manage sciatica.Conclusions This novel paper explores how patients experience the process of being managed within a sciatica pathway. While highlighting the need to align with recommended best practice, it shows the need to be more person-centred and to support and empower patient agency.Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov reference (UOS-2307-CR); Pre-results.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/6/e037157.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Clare Ryan
Catherine J Pope
Lisa Roberts
spellingShingle Clare Ryan
Catherine J Pope
Lisa Roberts
Why managing sciatica is difficult: patients’ experiences of an NHS sciatica pathway. A qualitative, interpretative study
BMJ Open
author_facet Clare Ryan
Catherine J Pope
Lisa Roberts
author_sort Clare Ryan
title Why managing sciatica is difficult: patients’ experiences of an NHS sciatica pathway. A qualitative, interpretative study
title_short Why managing sciatica is difficult: patients’ experiences of an NHS sciatica pathway. A qualitative, interpretative study
title_full Why managing sciatica is difficult: patients’ experiences of an NHS sciatica pathway. A qualitative, interpretative study
title_fullStr Why managing sciatica is difficult: patients’ experiences of an NHS sciatica pathway. A qualitative, interpretative study
title_full_unstemmed Why managing sciatica is difficult: patients’ experiences of an NHS sciatica pathway. A qualitative, interpretative study
title_sort why managing sciatica is difficult: patients’ experiences of an nhs sciatica pathway. a qualitative, interpretative study
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open
issn 2044-6055
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Objectives Amid a political agenda for integrated, high-value care, the UK is implementing its Low Back and Radicular Pain Pathway. To align care with need, it is imperative to understand the patients’ perspective. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to explore how people experience being managed for sciatica within an National Health Service (NHS) pathway.Design Qualitative interpretative study.Setting Musculoskeletal Service in an NHS, Primary Care Trust, UK.Participants The sample comprised 14 people aged ≥18 years with a clinical presentation of sciatica, who were currently under the care of a specialist physiotherapist (the specialist spinal triage practitioner), had undergone investigations (MRI) and received the results within the past 6 weeks. People were excluded if they had previously undergone spinal surgery or if the suspected cause of symptoms was cauda equina syndrome or sinister pathology. Participants were sampled purposively for variation in age and gender. Data were collected using individual semi-structured interviews (duration: 38–117 min; median: 82.6 min), which were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed thematically.Results A series of problems with the local pathway (insufficient transparency and information; clinician-led decisions; standardised management; restricted access to specialist care; and a lack of collaboration between services) made it difficult for patients to access the management they perceived necessary. Patients were therefore required to be independent and proactive or have agency. This was, however, difficult to achieve (due to the impact of sciatica and because patients lacked the necessary skills, funds and support) and together with the pathway issues, this negated patients’ capability to manage sciatica.Conclusions This novel paper explores how patients experience the process of being managed within a sciatica pathway. While highlighting the need to align with recommended best practice, it shows the need to be more person-centred and to support and empower patient agency.Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov reference (UOS-2307-CR); Pre-results.
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/6/e037157.full
work_keys_str_mv AT clareryan whymanagingsciaticaisdifficultpatientsexperiencesofannhssciaticapathwayaqualitativeinterpretativestudy
AT catherinejpope whymanagingsciaticaisdifficultpatientsexperiencesofannhssciaticapathwayaqualitativeinterpretativestudy
AT lisaroberts whymanagingsciaticaisdifficultpatientsexperiencesofannhssciaticapathwayaqualitativeinterpretativestudy
_version_ 1724221982789074944