How to Tell the War? Trench Warfare and the Realist Paradigm in First World War Narratives

This paper will analyze how memoirs and novels of the First World War reflect the challenges which modern warfare poses to realist narrative. Mechanized warfare resists the narrative encoding of experience. In particular, the nature of warfare on the Western Front 1914–1918, characterized by the fra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Martin Löschnigg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of English Studies 2018-09-01
Series:Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies
Online Access:http://www.anglica.ia.uw.edu.pl/images/pdf/27-3-SI-articles/Anglica-27-3-7-Loeschnigg.pdf
id doaj-e992f1c561c04f5fbf8de56ecedb4085
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e992f1c561c04f5fbf8de56ecedb40852020-11-24T23:46:51ZengInstitute of English StudiesAnglica. An International Journal of English Studies0860-57340860-57342018-09-01273143161How to Tell the War? Trench Warfare and the Realist Paradigm in First World War NarrativesMartin Löschnigg0University of GrazThis paper will analyze how memoirs and novels of the First World War reflect the challenges which modern warfare poses to realist narrative. Mechanized warfare resists the narrative encoding of experience. In particular, the nature of warfare on the Western Front 1914–1918, characterized by the fragmentation of vision in the trenches and the exposure of soldiers to a continuous sequence of acoustic shocks, had a disruptive effect on perceptions of time and space, and consequently on the rendering of the chronotope in narrative accounts of the fighting. Under the conditions of the Western Front, the order-creating and meaning-creating function of narrative seemed to have become suspended. As I want to show, these challenges account for a fundamental ambivalence in memoirs and novels which have largely been regarded as paradigmatically ‘realistic’ and ‘authentic’ anti-war narratives. Their documentary impetus, i.e. the claim to tell the ‘truth’ about the war, is often countered by textual fragmentation and a “cinematic telescoping of time” (Williams 29), i.e. by a structure which implies that such a ‘truth’ could not really be articulated. In consequence, these texts also explore the relationship between fact and fiction in the attempt at rendering an authentic account of the modern war experience. My examples are Edmund Blunden’s Undertones of War (1928), Robert Graves’s Goodbye to All That (1929) and the novel Generals Die in Bed (1930) by the Canadian Charles Yale Harrison, as well as German examples like Ernst Jünger’s In Stahlgewittern (1920; The Storm of Steel, 1929), Ludwig Renn’s Krieg (1928; War, 1929) and Edlef Köppen’s Heeresbericht (1930; Higher Command, 1931).http://www.anglica.ia.uw.edu.pl/images/pdf/27-3-SI-articles/Anglica-27-3-7-Loeschnigg.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Martin Löschnigg
spellingShingle Martin Löschnigg
How to Tell the War? Trench Warfare and the Realist Paradigm in First World War Narratives
Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies
author_facet Martin Löschnigg
author_sort Martin Löschnigg
title How to Tell the War? Trench Warfare and the Realist Paradigm in First World War Narratives
title_short How to Tell the War? Trench Warfare and the Realist Paradigm in First World War Narratives
title_full How to Tell the War? Trench Warfare and the Realist Paradigm in First World War Narratives
title_fullStr How to Tell the War? Trench Warfare and the Realist Paradigm in First World War Narratives
title_full_unstemmed How to Tell the War? Trench Warfare and the Realist Paradigm in First World War Narratives
title_sort how to tell the war? trench warfare and the realist paradigm in first world war narratives
publisher Institute of English Studies
series Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies
issn 0860-5734
0860-5734
publishDate 2018-09-01
description This paper will analyze how memoirs and novels of the First World War reflect the challenges which modern warfare poses to realist narrative. Mechanized warfare resists the narrative encoding of experience. In particular, the nature of warfare on the Western Front 1914–1918, characterized by the fragmentation of vision in the trenches and the exposure of soldiers to a continuous sequence of acoustic shocks, had a disruptive effect on perceptions of time and space, and consequently on the rendering of the chronotope in narrative accounts of the fighting. Under the conditions of the Western Front, the order-creating and meaning-creating function of narrative seemed to have become suspended. As I want to show, these challenges account for a fundamental ambivalence in memoirs and novels which have largely been regarded as paradigmatically ‘realistic’ and ‘authentic’ anti-war narratives. Their documentary impetus, i.e. the claim to tell the ‘truth’ about the war, is often countered by textual fragmentation and a “cinematic telescoping of time” (Williams 29), i.e. by a structure which implies that such a ‘truth’ could not really be articulated. In consequence, these texts also explore the relationship between fact and fiction in the attempt at rendering an authentic account of the modern war experience. My examples are Edmund Blunden’s Undertones of War (1928), Robert Graves’s Goodbye to All That (1929) and the novel Generals Die in Bed (1930) by the Canadian Charles Yale Harrison, as well as German examples like Ernst Jünger’s In Stahlgewittern (1920; The Storm of Steel, 1929), Ludwig Renn’s Krieg (1928; War, 1929) and Edlef Köppen’s Heeresbericht (1930; Higher Command, 1931).
url http://www.anglica.ia.uw.edu.pl/images/pdf/27-3-SI-articles/Anglica-27-3-7-Loeschnigg.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT martinloschnigg howtotellthewartrenchwarfareandtherealistparadigminfirstworldwarnarratives
_version_ 1725492049192419328