Dissecting Taxonomic Variants within <i>Ulmus</i> spp. Complex in Natural Forests with the Aid of Microsatellite and Morphometric Markers

Spontaneous hybrids between the native elms (genus <i>Ulmus</i> L.) have been observed in the forests of Europe. Gene conservation raises questions regarding the genetic background for the complex morphology and taxonomy of elms. Our objective was to dissect morphological and genetic var...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sigitas Tamošaitis, Girmantė Jurkšienė, Raimundas Petrokas, Jurata Buchovska, Ilona Kavaliauskienė, Darius Danusevičius, Virgilijus Baliuckas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-05-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/6/653
Description
Summary:Spontaneous hybrids between the native elms (genus <i>Ulmus</i> L.) have been observed in the forests of Europe. Gene conservation raises questions regarding the genetic background for the complex morphology and taxonomy of elms. Our objective was to dissect morphological and genetic variation in the natural swamps of <i>Ulmus</i> species groups in Lithuanian forests with the aid of leaf morphology and microsatellite (SSR) markers. We sampled leaves from 189 elms at 26 locations to grasp the phenotypic diversity in variable natural habitats in Lithuanian forests. We assigned the elms into six taxonomic and genetics groups based on 31 leaf morphology parameters and tested the genetic differentiation between these six groups at six nuclear SSR loci by using Bayesian and genetic distance-based clustering. The genetic and leaf morphometric analyses of putative elm hybrid swamps indicated a low genetic exchange between <i>U. laevis</i> Pall. and the other <i>Ulmus</i> groups. The genetic and morphometric data supported the differentiation of <i>U. glabra</i> Huds. and <i>U. glabra</i> (female) × <i>U. minor</i> Mill. (male) spontaneous hybrids. In addition, the results of the genetic analysis also confirmed the high level of genome sharing among <i>U. minor</i> and <i>U. minor</i> subsp. <i>minor</i> Richens., where leaf morphology failed to differentiate genetically discrete groups. For gene conservation, we would suggest considering separate gene conservation units selected based on leaf and stem morphology for <i>U. laevis</i>, <i>U. glabra</i>, <i>U. glabra</i> × <i>minor</i>, and the <i>U. minor</i> species complex.
ISSN:1999-4907