Impact of Using GPS L2 Receiver Antenna Corrections for the Galileo E5a Frequency on Position Estimates

Knowledge of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) antenna phase center variations plays a key role in precise positioning. Proper modeling is achieved by accessing antenna phase center corrections, which are determined in the calibration process. For most receiver antenna types, the Internation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrzej Araszkiewicz, Damian Kiliszek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-09-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/19/5536
id doaj-e97c2568119b4e93a3864614935fc2bd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e97c2568119b4e93a3864614935fc2bd2020-11-25T03:52:50ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202020-09-01205536553610.3390/s20195536Impact of Using GPS L2 Receiver Antenna Corrections for the Galileo E5a Frequency on Position EstimatesAndrzej Araszkiewicz0Damian Kiliszek1Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Military University of Technology, gen. S. Kaliskiego 2, 00-908 Warsaw, PolandFaculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Military University of Technology, gen. S. Kaliskiego 2, 00-908 Warsaw, PolandKnowledge of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) antenna phase center variations plays a key role in precise positioning. Proper modeling is achieved by accessing antenna phase center corrections, which are determined in the calibration process. For most receiver antenna types, the International GNSS Service provides such corrections for two GPS and GLONASS carrier signals. In the case of Galileo, access to phase center corrections is difficult; only antennas calibrated in the anechoic chambers have available corrections for Galileo frequencies. Hence, in many of the studies, GPS-dedicated corrections are used for these Galileo frequencies. Differential analysis was conducted in this study to evaluate the impact of such change. In total, 25 stations belonging to the EUREF Permanent Network and equipped with individual calibrated antennas were the subject of this research. The results for both the absolute and relative positioning methods are clear: using GPS L2 corrections for Galileo E5a frequency causes a bias in the estimated height of almost 8 mm. For the horizontal component, a significant difference can be noticed for only one type of antenna.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/19/5536phase center variationsGalileo frequencyreceiver antenna calibrationscoordinates
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrzej Araszkiewicz
Damian Kiliszek
spellingShingle Andrzej Araszkiewicz
Damian Kiliszek
Impact of Using GPS L2 Receiver Antenna Corrections for the Galileo E5a Frequency on Position Estimates
Sensors
phase center variations
Galileo frequency
receiver antenna calibrations
coordinates
author_facet Andrzej Araszkiewicz
Damian Kiliszek
author_sort Andrzej Araszkiewicz
title Impact of Using GPS L2 Receiver Antenna Corrections for the Galileo E5a Frequency on Position Estimates
title_short Impact of Using GPS L2 Receiver Antenna Corrections for the Galileo E5a Frequency on Position Estimates
title_full Impact of Using GPS L2 Receiver Antenna Corrections for the Galileo E5a Frequency on Position Estimates
title_fullStr Impact of Using GPS L2 Receiver Antenna Corrections for the Galileo E5a Frequency on Position Estimates
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Using GPS L2 Receiver Antenna Corrections for the Galileo E5a Frequency on Position Estimates
title_sort impact of using gps l2 receiver antenna corrections for the galileo e5a frequency on position estimates
publisher MDPI AG
series Sensors
issn 1424-8220
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Knowledge of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) antenna phase center variations plays a key role in precise positioning. Proper modeling is achieved by accessing antenna phase center corrections, which are determined in the calibration process. For most receiver antenna types, the International GNSS Service provides such corrections for two GPS and GLONASS carrier signals. In the case of Galileo, access to phase center corrections is difficult; only antennas calibrated in the anechoic chambers have available corrections for Galileo frequencies. Hence, in many of the studies, GPS-dedicated corrections are used for these Galileo frequencies. Differential analysis was conducted in this study to evaluate the impact of such change. In total, 25 stations belonging to the EUREF Permanent Network and equipped with individual calibrated antennas were the subject of this research. The results for both the absolute and relative positioning methods are clear: using GPS L2 corrections for Galileo E5a frequency causes a bias in the estimated height of almost 8 mm. For the horizontal component, a significant difference can be noticed for only one type of antenna.
topic phase center variations
Galileo frequency
receiver antenna calibrations
coordinates
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/19/5536
work_keys_str_mv AT andrzejaraszkiewicz impactofusinggpsl2receiverantennacorrectionsforthegalileoe5afrequencyonpositionestimates
AT damiankiliszek impactofusinggpsl2receiverantennacorrectionsforthegalileoe5afrequencyonpositionestimates
_version_ 1724480697879494656