Impact of Using GPS L2 Receiver Antenna Corrections for the Galileo E5a Frequency on Position Estimates
Knowledge of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) antenna phase center variations plays a key role in precise positioning. Proper modeling is achieved by accessing antenna phase center corrections, which are determined in the calibration process. For most receiver antenna types, the Internation...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Sensors |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/19/5536 |
id |
doaj-e97c2568119b4e93a3864614935fc2bd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e97c2568119b4e93a3864614935fc2bd2020-11-25T03:52:50ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202020-09-01205536553610.3390/s20195536Impact of Using GPS L2 Receiver Antenna Corrections for the Galileo E5a Frequency on Position EstimatesAndrzej Araszkiewicz0Damian Kiliszek1Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Military University of Technology, gen. S. Kaliskiego 2, 00-908 Warsaw, PolandFaculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Military University of Technology, gen. S. Kaliskiego 2, 00-908 Warsaw, PolandKnowledge of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) antenna phase center variations plays a key role in precise positioning. Proper modeling is achieved by accessing antenna phase center corrections, which are determined in the calibration process. For most receiver antenna types, the International GNSS Service provides such corrections for two GPS and GLONASS carrier signals. In the case of Galileo, access to phase center corrections is difficult; only antennas calibrated in the anechoic chambers have available corrections for Galileo frequencies. Hence, in many of the studies, GPS-dedicated corrections are used for these Galileo frequencies. Differential analysis was conducted in this study to evaluate the impact of such change. In total, 25 stations belonging to the EUREF Permanent Network and equipped with individual calibrated antennas were the subject of this research. The results for both the absolute and relative positioning methods are clear: using GPS L2 corrections for Galileo E5a frequency causes a bias in the estimated height of almost 8 mm. For the horizontal component, a significant difference can be noticed for only one type of antenna.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/19/5536phase center variationsGalileo frequencyreceiver antenna calibrationscoordinates |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Andrzej Araszkiewicz Damian Kiliszek |
spellingShingle |
Andrzej Araszkiewicz Damian Kiliszek Impact of Using GPS L2 Receiver Antenna Corrections for the Galileo E5a Frequency on Position Estimates Sensors phase center variations Galileo frequency receiver antenna calibrations coordinates |
author_facet |
Andrzej Araszkiewicz Damian Kiliszek |
author_sort |
Andrzej Araszkiewicz |
title |
Impact of Using GPS L2 Receiver Antenna Corrections for the Galileo E5a Frequency on Position Estimates |
title_short |
Impact of Using GPS L2 Receiver Antenna Corrections for the Galileo E5a Frequency on Position Estimates |
title_full |
Impact of Using GPS L2 Receiver Antenna Corrections for the Galileo E5a Frequency on Position Estimates |
title_fullStr |
Impact of Using GPS L2 Receiver Antenna Corrections for the Galileo E5a Frequency on Position Estimates |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impact of Using GPS L2 Receiver Antenna Corrections for the Galileo E5a Frequency on Position Estimates |
title_sort |
impact of using gps l2 receiver antenna corrections for the galileo e5a frequency on position estimates |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sensors |
issn |
1424-8220 |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
Knowledge of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) antenna phase center variations plays a key role in precise positioning. Proper modeling is achieved by accessing antenna phase center corrections, which are determined in the calibration process. For most receiver antenna types, the International GNSS Service provides such corrections for two GPS and GLONASS carrier signals. In the case of Galileo, access to phase center corrections is difficult; only antennas calibrated in the anechoic chambers have available corrections for Galileo frequencies. Hence, in many of the studies, GPS-dedicated corrections are used for these Galileo frequencies. Differential analysis was conducted in this study to evaluate the impact of such change. In total, 25 stations belonging to the EUREF Permanent Network and equipped with individual calibrated antennas were the subject of this research. The results for both the absolute and relative positioning methods are clear: using GPS L2 corrections for Galileo E5a frequency causes a bias in the estimated height of almost 8 mm. For the horizontal component, a significant difference can be noticed for only one type of antenna. |
topic |
phase center variations Galileo frequency receiver antenna calibrations coordinates |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/19/5536 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andrzejaraszkiewicz impactofusinggpsl2receiverantennacorrectionsforthegalileoe5afrequencyonpositionestimates AT damiankiliszek impactofusinggpsl2receiverantennacorrectionsforthegalileoe5afrequencyonpositionestimates |
_version_ |
1724480697879494656 |