Readability of Prostate Cancer Information Online: A Cross-Sectional Study
Reading and understanding health information, both components of health literacy, can influence patient decisions related to disease management. Older adults, the population of males at greatest risk for prostate cancer, may have compromised capacity to understand and use health information. The pur...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2018-09-01
|
Series: | American Journal of Men's Health |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988318780864 |
id |
doaj-e96e68b1b8a44cf691356318bc111abb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e96e68b1b8a44cf691356318bc111abb2020-11-25T03:09:34ZengSAGE PublishingAmerican Journal of Men's Health1557-98831557-98912018-09-011210.1177/1557988318780864Readability of Prostate Cancer Information Online: A Cross-Sectional StudyCorey H. Basch EdD, MPH0Danna Ethan EdD, MSW1Sarah A. MacLean BA2Joseph Fera PhD3Phillip Garcia4Charles E. Basch PhD5Department of Public Health, William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ, USADepartment of Health Sciences, Lehman College, The City University of New York, New York, NY, USAIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USADepartment of Mathematics, Lehman College, The City University of New York, New York, NY, USADepartment of Public Health, William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ, USARichard March Hoe Professor of Health and Education, Department of Health and Behavior Studies, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USAReading and understanding health information, both components of health literacy, can influence patient decisions related to disease management. Older adults, the population of males at greatest risk for prostate cancer, may have compromised capacity to understand and use health information. The purpose of this study was to determine the readability of prostate cancer materials on the Internet using five recommended readability tests. Using a cleared Internet browser, a search was conducted for “prostate cancer.” The URLs of the first 100 websites in English were recorded to create the sample. The readability scores for each website were determined using an online, recommended service. This service generates five commonly recommended readability tests. All five tests revealed that the majority of websites had difficult readability. There were no significant differences identified between websites with .org, .gov, or .edu extension versus those with .com, .net, or other extension. It is apparent that the Internet is used often as a resource for health-related information. This study demonstrates that the large majority of information available on the Internet about prostate cancer will not be readable for many individuals.https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988318780864 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Corey H. Basch EdD, MPH Danna Ethan EdD, MSW Sarah A. MacLean BA Joseph Fera PhD Phillip Garcia Charles E. Basch PhD |
spellingShingle |
Corey H. Basch EdD, MPH Danna Ethan EdD, MSW Sarah A. MacLean BA Joseph Fera PhD Phillip Garcia Charles E. Basch PhD Readability of Prostate Cancer Information Online: A Cross-Sectional Study American Journal of Men's Health |
author_facet |
Corey H. Basch EdD, MPH Danna Ethan EdD, MSW Sarah A. MacLean BA Joseph Fera PhD Phillip Garcia Charles E. Basch PhD |
author_sort |
Corey H. Basch EdD, MPH |
title |
Readability of Prostate Cancer Information Online: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_short |
Readability of Prostate Cancer Information Online: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full |
Readability of Prostate Cancer Information Online: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_fullStr |
Readability of Prostate Cancer Information Online: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Readability of Prostate Cancer Information Online: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_sort |
readability of prostate cancer information online: a cross-sectional study |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
American Journal of Men's Health |
issn |
1557-9883 1557-9891 |
publishDate |
2018-09-01 |
description |
Reading and understanding health information, both components of health literacy, can influence patient decisions related to disease management. Older adults, the population of males at greatest risk for prostate cancer, may have compromised capacity to understand and use health information. The purpose of this study was to determine the readability of prostate cancer materials on the Internet using five recommended readability tests. Using a cleared Internet browser, a search was conducted for “prostate cancer.” The URLs of the first 100 websites in English were recorded to create the sample. The readability scores for each website were determined using an online, recommended service. This service generates five commonly recommended readability tests. All five tests revealed that the majority of websites had difficult readability. There were no significant differences identified between websites with .org, .gov, or .edu extension versus those with .com, .net, or other extension. It is apparent that the Internet is used often as a resource for health-related information. This study demonstrates that the large majority of information available on the Internet about prostate cancer will not be readable for many individuals. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988318780864 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT coreyhbascheddmph readabilityofprostatecancerinformationonlineacrosssectionalstudy AT dannaethaneddmsw readabilityofprostatecancerinformationonlineacrosssectionalstudy AT sarahamacleanba readabilityofprostatecancerinformationonlineacrosssectionalstudy AT josephferaphd readabilityofprostatecancerinformationonlineacrosssectionalstudy AT phillipgarcia readabilityofprostatecancerinformationonlineacrosssectionalstudy AT charlesebaschphd readabilityofprostatecancerinformationonlineacrosssectionalstudy |
_version_ |
1724661828380786688 |