Readability of Prostate Cancer Information Online: A Cross-Sectional Study

Reading and understanding health information, both components of health literacy, can influence patient decisions related to disease management. Older adults, the population of males at greatest risk for prostate cancer, may have compromised capacity to understand and use health information. The pur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Corey H. Basch EdD, MPH, Danna Ethan EdD, MSW, Sarah A. MacLean BA, Joseph Fera PhD, Phillip Garcia, Charles E. Basch PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2018-09-01
Series:American Journal of Men's Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988318780864
id doaj-e96e68b1b8a44cf691356318bc111abb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e96e68b1b8a44cf691356318bc111abb2020-11-25T03:09:34ZengSAGE PublishingAmerican Journal of Men's Health1557-98831557-98912018-09-011210.1177/1557988318780864Readability of Prostate Cancer Information Online: A Cross-Sectional StudyCorey H. Basch EdD, MPH0Danna Ethan EdD, MSW1Sarah A. MacLean BA2Joseph Fera PhD3Phillip Garcia4Charles E. Basch PhD5Department of Public Health, William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ, USADepartment of Health Sciences, Lehman College, The City University of New York, New York, NY, USAIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USADepartment of Mathematics, Lehman College, The City University of New York, New York, NY, USADepartment of Public Health, William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ, USARichard March Hoe Professor of Health and Education, Department of Health and Behavior Studies, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USAReading and understanding health information, both components of health literacy, can influence patient decisions related to disease management. Older adults, the population of males at greatest risk for prostate cancer, may have compromised capacity to understand and use health information. The purpose of this study was to determine the readability of prostate cancer materials on the Internet using five recommended readability tests. Using a cleared Internet browser, a search was conducted for “prostate cancer.” The URLs of the first 100 websites in English were recorded to create the sample. The readability scores for each website were determined using an online, recommended service. This service generates five commonly recommended readability tests. All five tests revealed that the majority of websites had difficult readability. There were no significant differences identified between websites with .org, .gov, or .edu extension versus those with .com, .net, or other extension. It is apparent that the Internet is used often as a resource for health-related information. This study demonstrates that the large majority of information available on the Internet about prostate cancer will not be readable for many individuals.https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988318780864
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Corey H. Basch EdD, MPH
Danna Ethan EdD, MSW
Sarah A. MacLean BA
Joseph Fera PhD
Phillip Garcia
Charles E. Basch PhD
spellingShingle Corey H. Basch EdD, MPH
Danna Ethan EdD, MSW
Sarah A. MacLean BA
Joseph Fera PhD
Phillip Garcia
Charles E. Basch PhD
Readability of Prostate Cancer Information Online: A Cross-Sectional Study
American Journal of Men's Health
author_facet Corey H. Basch EdD, MPH
Danna Ethan EdD, MSW
Sarah A. MacLean BA
Joseph Fera PhD
Phillip Garcia
Charles E. Basch PhD
author_sort Corey H. Basch EdD, MPH
title Readability of Prostate Cancer Information Online: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Readability of Prostate Cancer Information Online: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Readability of Prostate Cancer Information Online: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Readability of Prostate Cancer Information Online: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Readability of Prostate Cancer Information Online: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort readability of prostate cancer information online: a cross-sectional study
publisher SAGE Publishing
series American Journal of Men's Health
issn 1557-9883
1557-9891
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Reading and understanding health information, both components of health literacy, can influence patient decisions related to disease management. Older adults, the population of males at greatest risk for prostate cancer, may have compromised capacity to understand and use health information. The purpose of this study was to determine the readability of prostate cancer materials on the Internet using five recommended readability tests. Using a cleared Internet browser, a search was conducted for “prostate cancer.” The URLs of the first 100 websites in English were recorded to create the sample. The readability scores for each website were determined using an online, recommended service. This service generates five commonly recommended readability tests. All five tests revealed that the majority of websites had difficult readability. There were no significant differences identified between websites with .org, .gov, or .edu extension versus those with .com, .net, or other extension. It is apparent that the Internet is used often as a resource for health-related information. This study demonstrates that the large majority of information available on the Internet about prostate cancer will not be readable for many individuals.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988318780864
work_keys_str_mv AT coreyhbascheddmph readabilityofprostatecancerinformationonlineacrosssectionalstudy
AT dannaethaneddmsw readabilityofprostatecancerinformationonlineacrosssectionalstudy
AT sarahamacleanba readabilityofprostatecancerinformationonlineacrosssectionalstudy
AT josephferaphd readabilityofprostatecancerinformationonlineacrosssectionalstudy
AT phillipgarcia readabilityofprostatecancerinformationonlineacrosssectionalstudy
AT charlesebaschphd readabilityofprostatecancerinformationonlineacrosssectionalstudy
_version_ 1724661828380786688