Institutional Review Boards and Public Relations/Mass Communication Research: Furthering the Conversation
Scholars in the fields of public relations and other aspects of communication regularly exchange frustrations about research project approvals, arguing that the Institutional Review Board (IRB) process is rife with problems. Understandably, some academics object to expansive notions of university...
Main Authors: | Patricia Mark, Jeanne S. McPherson |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Insitute for Public Relations
2009-06-01
|
Series: | Public Relations Journal |
Online Access: | https://prjournal.instituteforpr.org/wp-content/uploads/nstitutional-Review-Boards.pdf |
Similar Items
-
The Failed Conversion of CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield to For-Profit Status: Part 2, Lessons Learned
by: Bruce McPherson
Published: (2004-11-01) -
“Looking Back”: A Conversation with Katrina McPherson
by: Douglas Rosenberg, et al.
Published: (2014-12-01) -
Taking stock of higher education governing boards, governance, and governing : a case for organizational amorphousness
by: McPherson, Chad Michael
Published: (2017) -
Exploiting Exceptions to Enhance Interpretive Qualitative Health Research: Insights from a Study of Cancer Communication
by: Gladys McPherson, et al.
Published: (2006-06-01) -
Further insights on institutional conflicts of interest in research settings
by: Yew Long Lo
Published: (2020-03-01)