Attentional demands associated with augmented visual feedback during quiet standing

To investigate how additional visual feedback (VFB) affects postural stability we compared 20-sec center-of-pressure (COP) recordings in two conditions: without and with the VFB. Seven healthy adult subjects performed 10 trials lasting 20 seconds in each condition. Simultaneously, during all trials...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Krzysztof Kręcisz, Michał Kuczyński
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2018-06-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/5101.pdf
id doaj-e9669bd7eb6a4cfd936cae9577e156a1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e9669bd7eb6a4cfd936cae9577e156a12020-11-25T00:13:41ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592018-06-016e510110.7717/peerj.5101Attentional demands associated with augmented visual feedback during quiet standingKrzysztof Kręcisz0Michał Kuczyński1Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Opole University of Technology, Opole, PolandFaculty of Physiotherapy, University School of Physical Education in Wroclaw, Wroclaw, PolandTo investigate how additional visual feedback (VFB) affects postural stability we compared 20-sec center-of-pressure (COP) recordings in two conditions: without and with the VFB. Seven healthy adult subjects performed 10 trials lasting 20 seconds in each condition. Simultaneously, during all trials the simple auditory reaction time (RT) was measured. Based on the COP data, the following sway parameters were computed: standard deviation (SD), mean speed (MV), sample entropy (SE), and mean power frequency (MPF). The RT was higher in the VFB condition (p < 0.001) indicating that this condition was attention demanding. The VFB resulted in decreased SD and increased SE in both the medial-lateral (ML) and anterior-posterior (AP) planes (p < .001). These results account for the efficacy of the VFB in stabilizing posture and in producing more irregular COP signals which may be interpreted as higher automaticity and/or larger level of noise in postural control. The MPF was higher during VFB in both planes as was the MV in the AP plane only (p < 0.001). The latter data demonstrate higher activity of postural control system that was caused by the availability of the set-point on the screen and the resulting control error which facilitated and sped up postural control.https://peerj.com/articles/5101.pdfBody balanceSway entropyBiofeedbackAttentional focus
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Krzysztof Kręcisz
Michał Kuczyński
spellingShingle Krzysztof Kręcisz
Michał Kuczyński
Attentional demands associated with augmented visual feedback during quiet standing
PeerJ
Body balance
Sway entropy
Biofeedback
Attentional focus
author_facet Krzysztof Kręcisz
Michał Kuczyński
author_sort Krzysztof Kręcisz
title Attentional demands associated with augmented visual feedback during quiet standing
title_short Attentional demands associated with augmented visual feedback during quiet standing
title_full Attentional demands associated with augmented visual feedback during quiet standing
title_fullStr Attentional demands associated with augmented visual feedback during quiet standing
title_full_unstemmed Attentional demands associated with augmented visual feedback during quiet standing
title_sort attentional demands associated with augmented visual feedback during quiet standing
publisher PeerJ Inc.
series PeerJ
issn 2167-8359
publishDate 2018-06-01
description To investigate how additional visual feedback (VFB) affects postural stability we compared 20-sec center-of-pressure (COP) recordings in two conditions: without and with the VFB. Seven healthy adult subjects performed 10 trials lasting 20 seconds in each condition. Simultaneously, during all trials the simple auditory reaction time (RT) was measured. Based on the COP data, the following sway parameters were computed: standard deviation (SD), mean speed (MV), sample entropy (SE), and mean power frequency (MPF). The RT was higher in the VFB condition (p < 0.001) indicating that this condition was attention demanding. The VFB resulted in decreased SD and increased SE in both the medial-lateral (ML) and anterior-posterior (AP) planes (p < .001). These results account for the efficacy of the VFB in stabilizing posture and in producing more irregular COP signals which may be interpreted as higher automaticity and/or larger level of noise in postural control. The MPF was higher during VFB in both planes as was the MV in the AP plane only (p < 0.001). The latter data demonstrate higher activity of postural control system that was caused by the availability of the set-point on the screen and the resulting control error which facilitated and sped up postural control.
topic Body balance
Sway entropy
Biofeedback
Attentional focus
url https://peerj.com/articles/5101.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT krzysztofkrecisz attentionaldemandsassociatedwithaugmentedvisualfeedbackduringquietstanding
AT michałkuczynski attentionaldemandsassociatedwithaugmentedvisualfeedbackduringquietstanding
_version_ 1725393634843426816