The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition
In this review structural and functional changes are described in single species, even-aged, stands undergoing competition for light. Theories of the competition process as interactions between whole plants have been advanced but have not been successful in explaining these changes and how they var...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014-06-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Plant Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpls.2014.00275/full |
id |
doaj-e95770a4a96d4838a41ffd627a1ddc77 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e95770a4a96d4838a41ffd627a1ddc772020-11-24T23:54:04ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Plant Science1664-462X2014-06-01510.3389/fpls.2014.0027579095The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competitionDavid eFord0School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of WashingtonIn this review structural and functional changes are described in single species, even-aged, stands undergoing competition for light. Theories of the competition process as interactions between whole plants have been advanced but have not been successful in explaining these changes and how they vary between species or growing conditions. This task now falls to researchers in plant architecture.Research in plant architecture has defined three important functions of individual plants that determine the process of canopy development and competition: (i) resource acquisition plasticity; (ii) morphogenetic plasticity; (iii) architectural variation in efficiency of interception and utilization of light. In this review this research is synthesized into a theory for competition based on five groups of postulates about the functioning of plants in stands. Group 1: competition for light takes place at the level of component foliage and branches. Group 2: the outcome of competition is determined by the dynamic interaction between processes that exert dominance and processes that react to suppression. Group 3: species differences may affect both exertion of dominance and reaction to suppression. Group 4: individual plants may simultaneously exhibit, in different component parts, resource acquisition and morphogenetic plasticity. Group 5: mortality is a time delayed response to suppression.Development of architectural models when combined with field investigations is identifying research needed to develop a theory of architectural influences on the competition process. These include analyses of the integration of foliage and branch components into whole plant growth and precise definitions of environmental control of morphogenetic plasticity and its interaction with acquisition of carbon for plant growth.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpls.2014.00275/fullcompetitionplant architecturesize frequency distributionfunctional-structural plant modelsStand spatial structurecanopy light interception |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
David eFord |
spellingShingle |
David eFord The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition Frontiers in Plant Science competition plant architecture size frequency distribution functional-structural plant models Stand spatial structure canopy light interception |
author_facet |
David eFord |
author_sort |
David eFord |
title |
The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition |
title_short |
The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition |
title_full |
The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition |
title_fullStr |
The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition |
title_full_unstemmed |
The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition |
title_sort |
dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Plant Science |
issn |
1664-462X |
publishDate |
2014-06-01 |
description |
In this review structural and functional changes are described in single species, even-aged, stands undergoing competition for light. Theories of the competition process as interactions between whole plants have been advanced but have not been successful in explaining these changes and how they vary between species or growing conditions. This task now falls to researchers in plant architecture.Research in plant architecture has defined three important functions of individual plants that determine the process of canopy development and competition: (i) resource acquisition plasticity; (ii) morphogenetic plasticity; (iii) architectural variation in efficiency of interception and utilization of light. In this review this research is synthesized into a theory for competition based on five groups of postulates about the functioning of plants in stands. Group 1: competition for light takes place at the level of component foliage and branches. Group 2: the outcome of competition is determined by the dynamic interaction between processes that exert dominance and processes that react to suppression. Group 3: species differences may affect both exertion of dominance and reaction to suppression. Group 4: individual plants may simultaneously exhibit, in different component parts, resource acquisition and morphogenetic plasticity. Group 5: mortality is a time delayed response to suppression.Development of architectural models when combined with field investigations is identifying research needed to develop a theory of architectural influences on the competition process. These include analyses of the integration of foliage and branch components into whole plant growth and precise definitions of environmental control of morphogenetic plasticity and its interaction with acquisition of carbon for plant growth. |
topic |
competition plant architecture size frequency distribution functional-structural plant models Stand spatial structure canopy light interception |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpls.2014.00275/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT davideford thedynamicrelationshipbetweenplantarchitectureandcompetition AT davideford dynamicrelationshipbetweenplantarchitectureandcompetition |
_version_ |
1725467501733609472 |