The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition

In this review structural and functional changes are described in single species, even-aged, stands undergoing competition for light. Theories of the competition process as interactions between whole plants have been advanced but have not been successful in explaining these changes and how they var...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: David eFord
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Plant Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpls.2014.00275/full
id doaj-e95770a4a96d4838a41ffd627a1ddc77
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e95770a4a96d4838a41ffd627a1ddc772020-11-24T23:54:04ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Plant Science1664-462X2014-06-01510.3389/fpls.2014.0027579095The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competitionDavid eFord0School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of WashingtonIn this review structural and functional changes are described in single species, even-aged, stands undergoing competition for light. Theories of the competition process as interactions between whole plants have been advanced but have not been successful in explaining these changes and how they vary between species or growing conditions. This task now falls to researchers in plant architecture.Research in plant architecture has defined three important functions of individual plants that determine the process of canopy development and competition: (i) resource acquisition plasticity; (ii) morphogenetic plasticity; (iii) architectural variation in efficiency of interception and utilization of light. In this review this research is synthesized into a theory for competition based on five groups of postulates about the functioning of plants in stands. Group 1: competition for light takes place at the level of component foliage and branches. Group 2: the outcome of competition is determined by the dynamic interaction between processes that exert dominance and processes that react to suppression. Group 3: species differences may affect both exertion of dominance and reaction to suppression. Group 4: individual plants may simultaneously exhibit, in different component parts, resource acquisition and morphogenetic plasticity. Group 5: mortality is a time delayed response to suppression.Development of architectural models when combined with field investigations is identifying research needed to develop a theory of architectural influences on the competition process. These include analyses of the integration of foliage and branch components into whole plant growth and precise definitions of environmental control of morphogenetic plasticity and its interaction with acquisition of carbon for plant growth.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpls.2014.00275/fullcompetitionplant architecturesize frequency distributionfunctional-structural plant modelsStand spatial structurecanopy light interception
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David eFord
spellingShingle David eFord
The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition
Frontiers in Plant Science
competition
plant architecture
size frequency distribution
functional-structural plant models
Stand spatial structure
canopy light interception
author_facet David eFord
author_sort David eFord
title The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition
title_short The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition
title_full The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition
title_fullStr The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition
title_full_unstemmed The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition
title_sort dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Plant Science
issn 1664-462X
publishDate 2014-06-01
description In this review structural and functional changes are described in single species, even-aged, stands undergoing competition for light. Theories of the competition process as interactions between whole plants have been advanced but have not been successful in explaining these changes and how they vary between species or growing conditions. This task now falls to researchers in plant architecture.Research in plant architecture has defined three important functions of individual plants that determine the process of canopy development and competition: (i) resource acquisition plasticity; (ii) morphogenetic plasticity; (iii) architectural variation in efficiency of interception and utilization of light. In this review this research is synthesized into a theory for competition based on five groups of postulates about the functioning of plants in stands. Group 1: competition for light takes place at the level of component foliage and branches. Group 2: the outcome of competition is determined by the dynamic interaction between processes that exert dominance and processes that react to suppression. Group 3: species differences may affect both exertion of dominance and reaction to suppression. Group 4: individual plants may simultaneously exhibit, in different component parts, resource acquisition and morphogenetic plasticity. Group 5: mortality is a time delayed response to suppression.Development of architectural models when combined with field investigations is identifying research needed to develop a theory of architectural influences on the competition process. These include analyses of the integration of foliage and branch components into whole plant growth and precise definitions of environmental control of morphogenetic plasticity and its interaction with acquisition of carbon for plant growth.
topic competition
plant architecture
size frequency distribution
functional-structural plant models
Stand spatial structure
canopy light interception
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpls.2014.00275/full
work_keys_str_mv AT davideford thedynamicrelationshipbetweenplantarchitectureandcompetition
AT davideford dynamicrelationshipbetweenplantarchitectureandcompetition
_version_ 1725467501733609472