Reconstruction of the Position of the Honorary Council of Election Administrators in the Judicial System in Indonesia

The placement of DKPP as a unitary function of the joint election organizer with the KPU and Bawaslu in article 1 number 7 of Law 7/2017 on General Election has made the position of DKPP unclear, whether DKPP is qualified as a state administrative organ (TUN), or as an independent body outside the o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rudhi Achsoni, Istislam Istislam, Herman Suryo Kumoro, Aan Eko Widiarto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: International journal of multicultural and multireligious understanding 2020-11-01
Series:International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ijmmu.com/index.php/ijmmu/article/view/2120
id doaj-e94f539f744949de8bdd25b5ee43a91e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e94f539f744949de8bdd25b5ee43a91e2021-02-09T00:31:39ZengInternational journal of multicultural and multireligious understandingInternational Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding2364-53692364-53692020-11-017875075710.18415/ijmmu.v7i8.21201415Reconstruction of the Position of the Honorary Council of Election Administrators in the Judicial System in IndonesiaRudhi Achsoni0Istislam Istislam1Herman Suryo Kumoro2Aan Eko Widiarto3Universitas Brawijaya, MalangUniversitas Brawijaya, MalangUniversitas Brawijaya, MalangUniversitas Brawijaya, MalangThe placement of DKPP as a unitary function of the joint election organizer with the KPU and Bawaslu in article 1 number 7 of Law 7/2017 on General Election has made the position of DKPP unclear, whether DKPP is qualified as a state administrative organ (TUN), or as an independent body outside the organizer elections whose function is related to judicial power. The unclear position implies that the DKPP decision does not have legal certainty because legal remedies can be made at the State Administration Court. As a form of us constituendum, the author offers to reconstruct the position of DKPP in the judicial system by removing the DKPP from the election management environment, so that what is meant by election organizers only consists of the KPU and Bawaslu. As well as DKPP in the General Election Law is defined as a body whose function is related to judicial power and has the duty to enforce the code of ethics of election administrators. The author is of the view that with the new formulation arrangements regarding the DKPP, the space for the DKPP is not burdened by the boundaries of the election organizer, and the decisions issued cannot be taken legal remedies to the Administrative Court.https://ijmmu.com/index.php/ijmmu/article/view/2120reconstructionposition of dkppjudicial system in indonesia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rudhi Achsoni
Istislam Istislam
Herman Suryo Kumoro
Aan Eko Widiarto
spellingShingle Rudhi Achsoni
Istislam Istislam
Herman Suryo Kumoro
Aan Eko Widiarto
Reconstruction of the Position of the Honorary Council of Election Administrators in the Judicial System in Indonesia
International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
reconstruction
position of dkpp
judicial system in indonesia
author_facet Rudhi Achsoni
Istislam Istislam
Herman Suryo Kumoro
Aan Eko Widiarto
author_sort Rudhi Achsoni
title Reconstruction of the Position of the Honorary Council of Election Administrators in the Judicial System in Indonesia
title_short Reconstruction of the Position of the Honorary Council of Election Administrators in the Judicial System in Indonesia
title_full Reconstruction of the Position of the Honorary Council of Election Administrators in the Judicial System in Indonesia
title_fullStr Reconstruction of the Position of the Honorary Council of Election Administrators in the Judicial System in Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed Reconstruction of the Position of the Honorary Council of Election Administrators in the Judicial System in Indonesia
title_sort reconstruction of the position of the honorary council of election administrators in the judicial system in indonesia
publisher International journal of multicultural and multireligious understanding
series International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
issn 2364-5369
2364-5369
publishDate 2020-11-01
description The placement of DKPP as a unitary function of the joint election organizer with the KPU and Bawaslu in article 1 number 7 of Law 7/2017 on General Election has made the position of DKPP unclear, whether DKPP is qualified as a state administrative organ (TUN), or as an independent body outside the organizer elections whose function is related to judicial power. The unclear position implies that the DKPP decision does not have legal certainty because legal remedies can be made at the State Administration Court. As a form of us constituendum, the author offers to reconstruct the position of DKPP in the judicial system by removing the DKPP from the election management environment, so that what is meant by election organizers only consists of the KPU and Bawaslu. As well as DKPP in the General Election Law is defined as a body whose function is related to judicial power and has the duty to enforce the code of ethics of election administrators. The author is of the view that with the new formulation arrangements regarding the DKPP, the space for the DKPP is not burdened by the boundaries of the election organizer, and the decisions issued cannot be taken legal remedies to the Administrative Court.
topic reconstruction
position of dkpp
judicial system in indonesia
url https://ijmmu.com/index.php/ijmmu/article/view/2120
work_keys_str_mv AT rudhiachsoni reconstructionofthepositionofthehonorarycouncilofelectionadministratorsinthejudicialsysteminindonesia
AT istislamistislam reconstructionofthepositionofthehonorarycouncilofelectionadministratorsinthejudicialsysteminindonesia
AT hermansuryokumoro reconstructionofthepositionofthehonorarycouncilofelectionadministratorsinthejudicialsysteminindonesia
AT aanekowidiarto reconstructionofthepositionofthehonorarycouncilofelectionadministratorsinthejudicialsysteminindonesia
_version_ 1724278567943012352