A Unified Calibration Paradigm for a Better Cuffless Blood Pressure Estimation with Modes of Elastic Tube and Vascular Elasticity

Although two modes of elastic tube (ET) and vascular elasticity (VE) have been well explored for cuffless continuous blood pressure (BP) monitoring estimation, the initial calibration with these two models could be derived from different mathematical mechanisms for BP estimation. The study is aimed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiang Shao, Ping Shi, Sijung Hu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Sensors
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8868083
id doaj-e9257a70861245309a372789d200e32d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e9257a70861245309a372789d200e32d2021-04-26T00:03:16ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Sensors1687-72682021-01-01202110.1155/2021/8868083A Unified Calibration Paradigm for a Better Cuffless Blood Pressure Estimation with Modes of Elastic Tube and Vascular ElasticityJiang Shao0Ping Shi1Sijung Hu2Institute of Rehabilitation Engineering and TechnologyInstitute of Rehabilitation Engineering and TechnologyWolfson School of MechanicalAlthough two modes of elastic tube (ET) and vascular elasticity (VE) have been well explored for cuffless continuous blood pressure (BP) monitoring estimation, the initial calibration with these two models could be derived from different mathematical mechanisms for BP estimation. The study is aimed at evaluating the performance of VE and ET models by means of an advanced point-to-point (aPTP) pairing calibration. The cuff BPs were only taken up while the signals of PPG and ECG were synchronously acquired from individual subjects. Two popular VE models together with one representative ET model were designated to study aPTP as a unified assessment criterion. The VE model has demonstrated the stronger correlation r of 0.89 and 0.86 of SBP and DBP, respectively, and the lower estimated BP error of −0.01±5.90 (4.55) mmHg and 0.04±4.40 (3.38) mmHg of SBP and DBP, respectively, than the ET model. With the ET model, there is a significant difference between the methods of conventional least-square (LS) calibration and aPTP calibration (p<0.05). These results showed that the VE model surpasses the ET model under the same uniform calibration. The outcome has been unveiled that the selection of initial calibration methods was vital to work out diastolic BP with the ET model. The study revealed an evident fact about initial sensitivity between the modes of different BP estimation and initial calibration.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8868083
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jiang Shao
Ping Shi
Sijung Hu
spellingShingle Jiang Shao
Ping Shi
Sijung Hu
A Unified Calibration Paradigm for a Better Cuffless Blood Pressure Estimation with Modes of Elastic Tube and Vascular Elasticity
Journal of Sensors
author_facet Jiang Shao
Ping Shi
Sijung Hu
author_sort Jiang Shao
title A Unified Calibration Paradigm for a Better Cuffless Blood Pressure Estimation with Modes of Elastic Tube and Vascular Elasticity
title_short A Unified Calibration Paradigm for a Better Cuffless Blood Pressure Estimation with Modes of Elastic Tube and Vascular Elasticity
title_full A Unified Calibration Paradigm for a Better Cuffless Blood Pressure Estimation with Modes of Elastic Tube and Vascular Elasticity
title_fullStr A Unified Calibration Paradigm for a Better Cuffless Blood Pressure Estimation with Modes of Elastic Tube and Vascular Elasticity
title_full_unstemmed A Unified Calibration Paradigm for a Better Cuffless Blood Pressure Estimation with Modes of Elastic Tube and Vascular Elasticity
title_sort unified calibration paradigm for a better cuffless blood pressure estimation with modes of elastic tube and vascular elasticity
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Sensors
issn 1687-7268
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Although two modes of elastic tube (ET) and vascular elasticity (VE) have been well explored for cuffless continuous blood pressure (BP) monitoring estimation, the initial calibration with these two models could be derived from different mathematical mechanisms for BP estimation. The study is aimed at evaluating the performance of VE and ET models by means of an advanced point-to-point (aPTP) pairing calibration. The cuff BPs were only taken up while the signals of PPG and ECG were synchronously acquired from individual subjects. Two popular VE models together with one representative ET model were designated to study aPTP as a unified assessment criterion. The VE model has demonstrated the stronger correlation r of 0.89 and 0.86 of SBP and DBP, respectively, and the lower estimated BP error of −0.01±5.90 (4.55) mmHg and 0.04±4.40 (3.38) mmHg of SBP and DBP, respectively, than the ET model. With the ET model, there is a significant difference between the methods of conventional least-square (LS) calibration and aPTP calibration (p<0.05). These results showed that the VE model surpasses the ET model under the same uniform calibration. The outcome has been unveiled that the selection of initial calibration methods was vital to work out diastolic BP with the ET model. The study revealed an evident fact about initial sensitivity between the modes of different BP estimation and initial calibration.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8868083
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangshao aunifiedcalibrationparadigmforabettercufflessbloodpressureestimationwithmodesofelastictubeandvascularelasticity
AT pingshi aunifiedcalibrationparadigmforabettercufflessbloodpressureestimationwithmodesofelastictubeandvascularelasticity
AT sijunghu aunifiedcalibrationparadigmforabettercufflessbloodpressureestimationwithmodesofelastictubeandvascularelasticity
AT jiangshao unifiedcalibrationparadigmforabettercufflessbloodpressureestimationwithmodesofelastictubeandvascularelasticity
AT pingshi unifiedcalibrationparadigmforabettercufflessbloodpressureestimationwithmodesofelastictubeandvascularelasticity
AT sijunghu unifiedcalibrationparadigmforabettercufflessbloodpressureestimationwithmodesofelastictubeandvascularelasticity
_version_ 1714657721641336832