Post-trial follow-up methodology in large randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
Abstract Background Randomised controlled clinical trials typically have a relatively brief in-trial follow-up period which can underestimate safety signals and fail to detect long-term hazards, which may take years to appear. Extended follow-up after the scheduled closure of the trial allows detect...
Main Authors: | Rebecca Llewellyn-Bennett, Danielle Edwards, Nia Roberts, Atticus H. Hainsworth, Richard Bulbulia, Louise Bowman |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-05-01
|
Series: | Trials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-018-2653-0 |
Similar Items
-
Randomised study within a trial (SWAT) to evaluate personalised versus standard text message prompts for increasing trial participant response to postal questionnaires (PROMPTS)
by: Lucy Cureton, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01) -
Non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
by: Adel Elfeky, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01) -
What are the most important unanswered research questions in trial retention? A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership: the PRioRiTy II (Prioritising Retention in Randomised Trials) study
by: Dan Brunsdon, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01) -
Registration of noncommercial randomised clinical trials: the feasibility of using trial registries to monitor the number of trials
by: Raftery James, et al.
Published: (2012-08-01) -
Undertaking a randomised controlled trial in the police setting: methodological and practical challenges
by: Arabella Scantlebury, et al.
Published: (2017-12-01)