THE BOMBAY IMPROVEMENT TRUST, BOMBAY MILLOWNERS AND THE DEBATE OVER HOUSING BOMBAY’S MILLWORKERS, 1896-1918
In 1896, a devastating plague epidemic hit the city of Bombay, triggering panic among colonial officials, the commercial elite, and Bombay millowners. In response, 1898, the colonial state created the Bombay Improvement Trust (BIT), an institution mandated to improve the city for commerce and provid...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Economic & Business History Society
2012-06-01
|
Series: | Essays in Economic and Business History |
Online Access: | https://www.ebhsoc.org/journal/index.php/ebhs/article/view/221 |
id |
doaj-e915a07c26044e359ceac6c854436407 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e915a07c26044e359ceac6c8544364072020-11-25T03:18:17ZengEconomic & Business History SocietyEssays in Economic and Business History0896-226X2012-06-01301105123221THE BOMBAY IMPROVEMENT TRUST, BOMBAY MILLOWNERS AND THE DEBATE OVER HOUSING BOMBAY’S MILLWORKERS, 1896-1918Caroline ArnoldIn 1896, a devastating plague epidemic hit the city of Bombay, triggering panic among colonial officials, the commercial elite, and Bombay millowners. In response, 1898, the colonial state created the Bombay Improvement Trust (BIT), an institution mandated to improve the city for commerce and provide sanitary accommodations for the poorer and working classes. Despite having been created to improve housing conditions for the city's poorest classes, the Improvement Trust inadvertently increased the housing crisis. The Improvement Trust’s ideological blinders led the Trust to prioritize state thrift, so that the Trust acted as slum clearance board. Bombay’s millowners were disinclined to solve the housing problem themselves, because mills competed with each other for labor. Consequently, millowners failed to coordinate on basic labor practices, making the possibility of collaboration on the “housing question” even more remote. The competing political-economic cultures of the two groups, as well as their contradictory interests, facilitated mutual blaming by the Improvement Trust and millowners, which undermined a collaborative solution to the housing problem.https://www.ebhsoc.org/journal/index.php/ebhs/article/view/221 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Caroline Arnold |
spellingShingle |
Caroline Arnold THE BOMBAY IMPROVEMENT TRUST, BOMBAY MILLOWNERS AND THE DEBATE OVER HOUSING BOMBAY’S MILLWORKERS, 1896-1918 Essays in Economic and Business History |
author_facet |
Caroline Arnold |
author_sort |
Caroline Arnold |
title |
THE BOMBAY IMPROVEMENT TRUST, BOMBAY MILLOWNERS AND THE DEBATE OVER HOUSING BOMBAY’S MILLWORKERS, 1896-1918 |
title_short |
THE BOMBAY IMPROVEMENT TRUST, BOMBAY MILLOWNERS AND THE DEBATE OVER HOUSING BOMBAY’S MILLWORKERS, 1896-1918 |
title_full |
THE BOMBAY IMPROVEMENT TRUST, BOMBAY MILLOWNERS AND THE DEBATE OVER HOUSING BOMBAY’S MILLWORKERS, 1896-1918 |
title_fullStr |
THE BOMBAY IMPROVEMENT TRUST, BOMBAY MILLOWNERS AND THE DEBATE OVER HOUSING BOMBAY’S MILLWORKERS, 1896-1918 |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE BOMBAY IMPROVEMENT TRUST, BOMBAY MILLOWNERS AND THE DEBATE OVER HOUSING BOMBAY’S MILLWORKERS, 1896-1918 |
title_sort |
bombay improvement trust, bombay millowners and the debate over housing bombay’s millworkers, 1896-1918 |
publisher |
Economic & Business History Society |
series |
Essays in Economic and Business History |
issn |
0896-226X |
publishDate |
2012-06-01 |
description |
In 1896, a devastating plague epidemic hit the city of Bombay, triggering panic among colonial officials, the commercial elite, and Bombay millowners. In response, 1898, the colonial state created the Bombay Improvement Trust (BIT), an institution mandated to improve the city for commerce and provide sanitary accommodations for the poorer and working classes. Despite having been created to improve housing conditions for the city's poorest classes, the Improvement Trust inadvertently increased the housing crisis. The Improvement Trust’s ideological blinders led the Trust to prioritize state thrift, so that the Trust acted as slum clearance board. Bombay’s millowners were disinclined to solve the housing problem themselves, because mills competed with each other for labor. Consequently, millowners failed to coordinate on basic labor practices, making the possibility of collaboration on the “housing question” even more remote. The competing political-economic cultures of the two groups, as well as their contradictory interests, facilitated mutual blaming by the Improvement Trust and millowners, which undermined a collaborative solution to the housing problem. |
url |
https://www.ebhsoc.org/journal/index.php/ebhs/article/view/221 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT carolinearnold thebombayimprovementtrustbombaymillownersandthedebateoverhousingbombaysmillworkers18961918 AT carolinearnold bombayimprovementtrustbombaymillownersandthedebateoverhousingbombaysmillworkers18961918 |
_version_ |
1724627727438315520 |