The Future of Essentially Derived Variety (EDV) Status: Predominantly More Explanations or Essential Change

This review examines the categorization of Essentially Derived Varieties (EDV) introduced in the 1991 revision of the Convention of the <i>Union internationale pour la protection des obtentions végétales</i> (UPOV). Other non-UPOV member countries (India, Malaysia, and Thailand) have als...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: John Stephen C. Smith
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Agronomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/6/1261
id doaj-e9114bd99c454ae292d60feb9518248b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e9114bd99c454ae292d60feb9518248b2021-07-01T00:47:28ZengMDPI AGAgronomy2073-43952021-06-01111261126110.3390/agronomy11061261The Future of Essentially Derived Variety (EDV) Status: Predominantly More Explanations or Essential ChangeJohn Stephen C. Smith0Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, 2104 Agronomy Hall, 716 Farm House Lane, Ames, IA 50011-1051, USAThis review examines the categorization of Essentially Derived Varieties (EDV) introduced in the 1991 revision of the Convention of the <i>Union internationale pour la protection des obtentions végétales</i> (UPOV). Other non-UPOV member countries (India, Malaysia, and Thailand) have also introduced the concept of essential derivation. China, a UPOV member operating under the 1978 Convention, is introducing EDVs via seed laws. Challenges in the implementation of the concept and progress made to provide greater clarity and more efficient implementation are reviewed, including in Australia and India. The current approach to EDV remains valid provided (i) clarity on thresholds can be achieved including through resource intensive research on an individual crop species basis and (ii) that threshold clarity does not lead to perverse incentives to avoid detection of essential derivation. However, technological advances that facilitate the simultaneous introduction or change in expression of more than “a few” genes may well fundamentally challenge the concept of essential derivation and require a revision of the Convention. Revision could include deletion of the concept of essential derivation coupled with changes to the breeder exception on a crop-by-crop basis. Stakeholders might also benefit from greater flexibility within a revised Convention. Consideration should be given to allowing members to choose if and when to introduce changes according to a revised Convention on a crop specific basis.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/6/1261intellectual propertyintellectual property protectionplant variety protectionplant breeders’ rightsessentially derived varietyutility patent
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John Stephen C. Smith
spellingShingle John Stephen C. Smith
The Future of Essentially Derived Variety (EDV) Status: Predominantly More Explanations or Essential Change
Agronomy
intellectual property
intellectual property protection
plant variety protection
plant breeders’ rights
essentially derived variety
utility patent
author_facet John Stephen C. Smith
author_sort John Stephen C. Smith
title The Future of Essentially Derived Variety (EDV) Status: Predominantly More Explanations or Essential Change
title_short The Future of Essentially Derived Variety (EDV) Status: Predominantly More Explanations or Essential Change
title_full The Future of Essentially Derived Variety (EDV) Status: Predominantly More Explanations or Essential Change
title_fullStr The Future of Essentially Derived Variety (EDV) Status: Predominantly More Explanations or Essential Change
title_full_unstemmed The Future of Essentially Derived Variety (EDV) Status: Predominantly More Explanations or Essential Change
title_sort future of essentially derived variety (edv) status: predominantly more explanations or essential change
publisher MDPI AG
series Agronomy
issn 2073-4395
publishDate 2021-06-01
description This review examines the categorization of Essentially Derived Varieties (EDV) introduced in the 1991 revision of the Convention of the <i>Union internationale pour la protection des obtentions végétales</i> (UPOV). Other non-UPOV member countries (India, Malaysia, and Thailand) have also introduced the concept of essential derivation. China, a UPOV member operating under the 1978 Convention, is introducing EDVs via seed laws. Challenges in the implementation of the concept and progress made to provide greater clarity and more efficient implementation are reviewed, including in Australia and India. The current approach to EDV remains valid provided (i) clarity on thresholds can be achieved including through resource intensive research on an individual crop species basis and (ii) that threshold clarity does not lead to perverse incentives to avoid detection of essential derivation. However, technological advances that facilitate the simultaneous introduction or change in expression of more than “a few” genes may well fundamentally challenge the concept of essential derivation and require a revision of the Convention. Revision could include deletion of the concept of essential derivation coupled with changes to the breeder exception on a crop-by-crop basis. Stakeholders might also benefit from greater flexibility within a revised Convention. Consideration should be given to allowing members to choose if and when to introduce changes according to a revised Convention on a crop specific basis.
topic intellectual property
intellectual property protection
plant variety protection
plant breeders’ rights
essentially derived variety
utility patent
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/6/1261
work_keys_str_mv AT johnstephencsmith thefutureofessentiallyderivedvarietyedvstatuspredominantlymoreexplanationsoressentialchange
AT johnstephencsmith futureofessentiallyderivedvarietyedvstatuspredominantlymoreexplanationsoressentialchange
_version_ 1721347791755673600