Doubts on Kissinger´s method of kinetic evaluation based on several conceptual models showing the difference between the maximum of reaction rate and the extreme of a DTA peak

The famous Kissinger's kinetic evaluation method (Anal. Chem. 1957) is examined with respect to the feasible impact of the individual quantities and assumptions involved, namely the model of reaction mechanism, f(a) (with the iso- and nonisothermal degrees of conversion, α and λ) the r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Šesták J., Holba P., Živković Ž.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Technical Faculty, Bor 2014-01-01
Series:Journal of Mining and Metallurgy. Section B: Metallurgy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/1450-5339/2014/1450-53391400006S.pdf
id doaj-e8ffa55c27594e658cecbf1e899163b0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e8ffa55c27594e658cecbf1e899163b02020-11-25T00:04:58ZengTechnical Faculty, BorJournal of Mining and Metallurgy. Section B: Metallurgy1450-53392014-01-01501778110.2298/JMMB130902006S1450-53391400006SDoubts on Kissinger´s method of kinetic evaluation based on several conceptual models showing the difference between the maximum of reaction rate and the extreme of a DTA peakŠesták J.0Holba P.1Živković Ž.2University of West Bohemia in Pilsen (NTC-ZČU), New Technologies - Research Centre of the Westbohemian Region, Plzeň, Czech republicUniversity of West Bohemia in Pilsen (NTC-ZČU), New Technologies - Research Centre of the Westbohemian Region, Plzeň, Czech republicTechnical Faculty, BorThe famous Kissinger's kinetic evaluation method (Anal. Chem. 1957) is examined with respect to the feasible impact of the individual quantities and assumptions involved, namely the model of reaction mechanism, f(a) (with the iso- and nonisothermal degrees of conversion, α and λ) the rate constant, k(T) (and associated activation energy, E), heating/cooling rate, b (supplementing additional thermodynamic term for the melt undercooling, ΔT) and above all, the association of the characteristic temperature, Tm, with the DTA peak apex. It is shown that the Kissinger/s equation, in contrary to the results of Vold (Anal. Chem. 1949), is omitting the term of heat inertia arising from the true balance of heat fluxes. The absence of this term skews the evaluated values of activation energies.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/1450-5339/2014/1450-53391400006S.pdfnema
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Šesták J.
Holba P.
Živković Ž.
spellingShingle Šesták J.
Holba P.
Živković Ž.
Doubts on Kissinger´s method of kinetic evaluation based on several conceptual models showing the difference between the maximum of reaction rate and the extreme of a DTA peak
Journal of Mining and Metallurgy. Section B: Metallurgy
nema
author_facet Šesták J.
Holba P.
Živković Ž.
author_sort Šesták J.
title Doubts on Kissinger´s method of kinetic evaluation based on several conceptual models showing the difference between the maximum of reaction rate and the extreme of a DTA peak
title_short Doubts on Kissinger´s method of kinetic evaluation based on several conceptual models showing the difference between the maximum of reaction rate and the extreme of a DTA peak
title_full Doubts on Kissinger´s method of kinetic evaluation based on several conceptual models showing the difference between the maximum of reaction rate and the extreme of a DTA peak
title_fullStr Doubts on Kissinger´s method of kinetic evaluation based on several conceptual models showing the difference between the maximum of reaction rate and the extreme of a DTA peak
title_full_unstemmed Doubts on Kissinger´s method of kinetic evaluation based on several conceptual models showing the difference between the maximum of reaction rate and the extreme of a DTA peak
title_sort doubts on kissinger´s method of kinetic evaluation based on several conceptual models showing the difference between the maximum of reaction rate and the extreme of a dta peak
publisher Technical Faculty, Bor
series Journal of Mining and Metallurgy. Section B: Metallurgy
issn 1450-5339
publishDate 2014-01-01
description The famous Kissinger's kinetic evaluation method (Anal. Chem. 1957) is examined with respect to the feasible impact of the individual quantities and assumptions involved, namely the model of reaction mechanism, f(a) (with the iso- and nonisothermal degrees of conversion, α and λ) the rate constant, k(T) (and associated activation energy, E), heating/cooling rate, b (supplementing additional thermodynamic term for the melt undercooling, ΔT) and above all, the association of the characteristic temperature, Tm, with the DTA peak apex. It is shown that the Kissinger/s equation, in contrary to the results of Vold (Anal. Chem. 1949), is omitting the term of heat inertia arising from the true balance of heat fluxes. The absence of this term skews the evaluated values of activation energies.
topic nema
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/1450-5339/2014/1450-53391400006S.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sestakj doubtsonkissingersmethodofkineticevaluationbasedonseveralconceptualmodelsshowingthedifferencebetweenthemaximumofreactionrateandtheextremeofadtapeak
AT holbap doubtsonkissingersmethodofkineticevaluationbasedonseveralconceptualmodelsshowingthedifferencebetweenthemaximumofreactionrateandtheextremeofadtapeak
AT zivkovicz doubtsonkissingersmethodofkineticevaluationbasedonseveralconceptualmodelsshowingthedifferencebetweenthemaximumofreactionrateandtheextremeofadtapeak
_version_ 1725427066432651264