TUDY REGARDING SHARE OF PERI-IMPLANT BONE AUGMENTATION TECHNIQUES AND MATERIALS

The study aimed to assess the distribution of periimplant augmentation techniques and graft materials in relation to demographic factors and local parameters. Materials and method. In a study group of 100 edentulous patients candidate to dental implants it was investigated the share of bone augm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bianca Törok, Roland Törok, Forna Norina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Romanian Society of Oral Rehabilitation 2020-04-01
Series:Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Subjects:
gbr
Online Access:http://www.rjor.ro/study-regarding-share-of-peri-implant-bone-augmentation-techniques-and-materials/
id doaj-e8f6ab7356ad427a9b999c05ffc26bcd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e8f6ab7356ad427a9b999c05ffc26bcd2020-11-25T01:45:57ZengRomanian Society of Oral RehabilitationRomanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation2066-70002601-46612020-04-011218896TUDY REGARDING SHARE OF PERI-IMPLANT BONE AUGMENTATION TECHNIQUES AND MATERIALSBianca Törok0Roland Törok1Forna Norina2 PhD Student, U.M.F. “Grigore T.Popa” Iasi, Faculty of Dental Medicine Expert in Oral Implantology, Implant Institute Török, Nűrnberg, Germany Univ.Prof., U.M.F. “Grigore T.Popa” Iasi, Faculty of Dental Medicine, correspondent member of AOSR; full member of ASMThe study aimed to assess the distribution of periimplant augmentation techniques and graft materials in relation to demographic factors and local parameters. Materials and method. In a study group of 100 edentulous patients candidate to dental implants it was investigated the share of bone augmentation techniques and graft materials in relation to age groups, edentation localization (maxillary vs mandibular; dental groups); alveolar bone resorption degree. Results. GBR technique was mostly used with highest shares as follows: 92,3% for maxillary implant sites in age group 50-59, 78,3% for maxillary implant sites in areas of molars and premolars, all implant sites Misch class B. Conclusions. Traditional GBR was the most used addition technique, followed by SGBR and block transplant for all age groups, localization and alveolar bone resorption degrees. Xenografts were the most used augmentation materials for all categories of alveolar bone resorption.http://www.rjor.ro/study-regarding-share-of-peri-implant-bone-augmentation-techniques-and-materials/allograftsautogenous boneblock transplantgbrsgbrxenografts
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bianca Törok
Roland Törok
Forna Norina
spellingShingle Bianca Törok
Roland Törok
Forna Norina
TUDY REGARDING SHARE OF PERI-IMPLANT BONE AUGMENTATION TECHNIQUES AND MATERIALS
Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
allografts
autogenous bone
block transplant
gbr
sgbr
xenografts
author_facet Bianca Törok
Roland Törok
Forna Norina
author_sort Bianca Törok
title TUDY REGARDING SHARE OF PERI-IMPLANT BONE AUGMENTATION TECHNIQUES AND MATERIALS
title_short TUDY REGARDING SHARE OF PERI-IMPLANT BONE AUGMENTATION TECHNIQUES AND MATERIALS
title_full TUDY REGARDING SHARE OF PERI-IMPLANT BONE AUGMENTATION TECHNIQUES AND MATERIALS
title_fullStr TUDY REGARDING SHARE OF PERI-IMPLANT BONE AUGMENTATION TECHNIQUES AND MATERIALS
title_full_unstemmed TUDY REGARDING SHARE OF PERI-IMPLANT BONE AUGMENTATION TECHNIQUES AND MATERIALS
title_sort tudy regarding share of peri-implant bone augmentation techniques and materials
publisher Romanian Society of Oral Rehabilitation
series Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
issn 2066-7000
2601-4661
publishDate 2020-04-01
description The study aimed to assess the distribution of periimplant augmentation techniques and graft materials in relation to demographic factors and local parameters. Materials and method. In a study group of 100 edentulous patients candidate to dental implants it was investigated the share of bone augmentation techniques and graft materials in relation to age groups, edentation localization (maxillary vs mandibular; dental groups); alveolar bone resorption degree. Results. GBR technique was mostly used with highest shares as follows: 92,3% for maxillary implant sites in age group 50-59, 78,3% for maxillary implant sites in areas of molars and premolars, all implant sites Misch class B. Conclusions. Traditional GBR was the most used addition technique, followed by SGBR and block transplant for all age groups, localization and alveolar bone resorption degrees. Xenografts were the most used augmentation materials for all categories of alveolar bone resorption.
topic allografts
autogenous bone
block transplant
gbr
sgbr
xenografts
url http://www.rjor.ro/study-regarding-share-of-peri-implant-bone-augmentation-techniques-and-materials/
work_keys_str_mv AT biancatorok tudyregardingshareofperiimplantboneaugmentationtechniquesandmaterials
AT rolandtorok tudyregardingshareofperiimplantboneaugmentationtechniquesandmaterials
AT fornanorina tudyregardingshareofperiimplantboneaugmentationtechniquesandmaterials
_version_ 1725021643117428736