TUDY REGARDING SHARE OF PERI-IMPLANT BONE AUGMENTATION TECHNIQUES AND MATERIALS
The study aimed to assess the distribution of periimplant augmentation techniques and graft materials in relation to demographic factors and local parameters. Materials and method. In a study group of 100 edentulous patients candidate to dental implants it was investigated the share of bone augm...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Romanian Society of Oral Rehabilitation
2020-04-01
|
Series: | Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.rjor.ro/study-regarding-share-of-peri-implant-bone-augmentation-techniques-and-materials/ |
id |
doaj-e8f6ab7356ad427a9b999c05ffc26bcd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e8f6ab7356ad427a9b999c05ffc26bcd2020-11-25T01:45:57ZengRomanian Society of Oral RehabilitationRomanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation2066-70002601-46612020-04-011218896TUDY REGARDING SHARE OF PERI-IMPLANT BONE AUGMENTATION TECHNIQUES AND MATERIALSBianca Törok0Roland Törok1Forna Norina2 PhD Student, U.M.F. “Grigore T.Popa” Iasi, Faculty of Dental Medicine Expert in Oral Implantology, Implant Institute Török, Nűrnberg, Germany Univ.Prof., U.M.F. “Grigore T.Popa” Iasi, Faculty of Dental Medicine, correspondent member of AOSR; full member of ASMThe study aimed to assess the distribution of periimplant augmentation techniques and graft materials in relation to demographic factors and local parameters. Materials and method. In a study group of 100 edentulous patients candidate to dental implants it was investigated the share of bone augmentation techniques and graft materials in relation to age groups, edentation localization (maxillary vs mandibular; dental groups); alveolar bone resorption degree. Results. GBR technique was mostly used with highest shares as follows: 92,3% for maxillary implant sites in age group 50-59, 78,3% for maxillary implant sites in areas of molars and premolars, all implant sites Misch class B. Conclusions. Traditional GBR was the most used addition technique, followed by SGBR and block transplant for all age groups, localization and alveolar bone resorption degrees. Xenografts were the most used augmentation materials for all categories of alveolar bone resorption.http://www.rjor.ro/study-regarding-share-of-peri-implant-bone-augmentation-techniques-and-materials/allograftsautogenous boneblock transplantgbrsgbrxenografts |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Bianca Törok Roland Törok Forna Norina |
spellingShingle |
Bianca Törok Roland Törok Forna Norina TUDY REGARDING SHARE OF PERI-IMPLANT BONE AUGMENTATION TECHNIQUES AND MATERIALS Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation allografts autogenous bone block transplant gbr sgbr xenografts |
author_facet |
Bianca Törok Roland Törok Forna Norina |
author_sort |
Bianca Törok |
title |
TUDY REGARDING SHARE OF PERI-IMPLANT BONE AUGMENTATION TECHNIQUES AND MATERIALS |
title_short |
TUDY REGARDING SHARE OF PERI-IMPLANT BONE AUGMENTATION TECHNIQUES AND MATERIALS |
title_full |
TUDY REGARDING SHARE OF PERI-IMPLANT BONE AUGMENTATION TECHNIQUES AND MATERIALS |
title_fullStr |
TUDY REGARDING SHARE OF PERI-IMPLANT BONE AUGMENTATION TECHNIQUES AND MATERIALS |
title_full_unstemmed |
TUDY REGARDING SHARE OF PERI-IMPLANT BONE AUGMENTATION TECHNIQUES AND MATERIALS |
title_sort |
tudy regarding share of peri-implant bone augmentation techniques and materials |
publisher |
Romanian Society of Oral Rehabilitation |
series |
Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation |
issn |
2066-7000 2601-4661 |
publishDate |
2020-04-01 |
description |
The study aimed to assess the distribution of periimplant augmentation techniques and graft materials in relation to demographic factors and local parameters.
Materials and method. In a study group of 100 edentulous patients candidate to dental implants it was investigated the share of bone augmentation techniques and graft materials in relation to age groups, edentation localization (maxillary vs mandibular; dental groups); alveolar bone resorption degree.
Results. GBR technique was mostly used with highest shares as follows: 92,3% for maxillary implant sites in age group 50-59, 78,3% for maxillary implant sites in areas of molars and premolars, all implant sites Misch class B.
Conclusions. Traditional GBR was the most used addition technique, followed by SGBR and block transplant for all age groups, localization and alveolar bone resorption degrees. Xenografts were the most used augmentation materials for all categories of alveolar bone resorption. |
topic |
allografts autogenous bone block transplant gbr sgbr xenografts |
url |
http://www.rjor.ro/study-regarding-share-of-peri-implant-bone-augmentation-techniques-and-materials/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT biancatorok tudyregardingshareofperiimplantboneaugmentationtechniquesandmaterials AT rolandtorok tudyregardingshareofperiimplantboneaugmentationtechniquesandmaterials AT fornanorina tudyregardingshareofperiimplantboneaugmentationtechniquesandmaterials |
_version_ |
1725021643117428736 |