A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Technology for the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures

Purpose. Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has been widely used in orthopedics surgery. However, its efficacy in acetabular fractures remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the effect of using 3D printing technology in the surgery for acetabular...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jin Cao, Huanye Zhu, Chao Gao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2021-01-01
Series:BioMed Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5018791
id doaj-e8ec5202d00244478f84d22c0eb6675a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e8ec5202d00244478f84d22c0eb6675a2021-08-30T00:00:46ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61412021-01-01202110.1155/2021/5018791A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Technology for the Treatment of Acetabular FracturesJin Cao0Huanye Zhu1Chao Gao2Department of OrthopedicsDepartment of OrthopedicsDepartment of OrthopedicsPurpose. Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has been widely used in orthopedics surgery. However, its efficacy in acetabular fractures remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the effect of using 3D printing technology in the surgery for acetabular fractures. Methods. The systematic review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. Four major electronic databases were searched (inception to February 2021). Studies were screened using a priori criteria. Data from each study were extracted by two independent reviewers and organized using a standardized table. Data were pooled and presented in forest plots. Results. Thirteen studies were included in the final analysis. Four were prospective randomized trials, and nine used a retrospective comparative design. The patients aged between 32.1 (SD 14.6) years and 51.9 (SD 18.9) years. Based on the pooled analyses, overall, 3D printing-assisted surgery decreased operation time by 38.8 minutes (95% CI: -54.9, -22.8), intraoperative blood loss by 259.7 ml (95% CI: -394.6, -124.9), instrumentation time by 34.1 minutes (95% CI: -49.0, -19.1). Traditional surgery was less likely to achieve good/excellent function of hip (RR, 0.53; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.82) and more likely to have complications than 3D printing-assisted surgery (RR, 1.19; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.33). Conclusions. 3D printing technology demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of acetabular fractures. It may improve surgery-related and clinical outcomes. More prospective studies using a rigorous design (e.g., randomized trial with blinding) are warranted to confirm the long-term effects of 3D printing technology in orthopedics surgeries.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5018791
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jin Cao
Huanye Zhu
Chao Gao
spellingShingle Jin Cao
Huanye Zhu
Chao Gao
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Technology for the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures
BioMed Research International
author_facet Jin Cao
Huanye Zhu
Chao Gao
author_sort Jin Cao
title A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Technology for the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures
title_short A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Technology for the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures
title_full A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Technology for the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures
title_fullStr A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Technology for the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Technology for the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of 3d printing technology for the treatment of acetabular fractures
publisher Hindawi Limited
series BioMed Research International
issn 2314-6141
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Purpose. Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has been widely used in orthopedics surgery. However, its efficacy in acetabular fractures remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the effect of using 3D printing technology in the surgery for acetabular fractures. Methods. The systematic review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. Four major electronic databases were searched (inception to February 2021). Studies were screened using a priori criteria. Data from each study were extracted by two independent reviewers and organized using a standardized table. Data were pooled and presented in forest plots. Results. Thirteen studies were included in the final analysis. Four were prospective randomized trials, and nine used a retrospective comparative design. The patients aged between 32.1 (SD 14.6) years and 51.9 (SD 18.9) years. Based on the pooled analyses, overall, 3D printing-assisted surgery decreased operation time by 38.8 minutes (95% CI: -54.9, -22.8), intraoperative blood loss by 259.7 ml (95% CI: -394.6, -124.9), instrumentation time by 34.1 minutes (95% CI: -49.0, -19.1). Traditional surgery was less likely to achieve good/excellent function of hip (RR, 0.53; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.82) and more likely to have complications than 3D printing-assisted surgery (RR, 1.19; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.33). Conclusions. 3D printing technology demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of acetabular fractures. It may improve surgery-related and clinical outcomes. More prospective studies using a rigorous design (e.g., randomized trial with blinding) are warranted to confirm the long-term effects of 3D printing technology in orthopedics surgeries.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5018791
work_keys_str_mv AT jincao asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof3dprintingtechnologyforthetreatmentofacetabularfractures
AT huanyezhu asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof3dprintingtechnologyforthetreatmentofacetabularfractures
AT chaogao asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof3dprintingtechnologyforthetreatmentofacetabularfractures
AT jincao systematicreviewandmetaanalysisof3dprintingtechnologyforthetreatmentofacetabularfractures
AT huanyezhu systematicreviewandmetaanalysisof3dprintingtechnologyforthetreatmentofacetabularfractures
AT chaogao systematicreviewandmetaanalysisof3dprintingtechnologyforthetreatmentofacetabularfractures
_version_ 1721186156947701760