The ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations measured by TEE to monitor fluid responsiveness in high-risk surgical patients during craniotomy: a prospective cohort study

Abstract Background This study was aimed to evaluate the ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations (LVEDVV) measured by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) compared with stroke volume variation (SVV) obtained by the FloTrac/Vigileo monitor to predict fluid responsiveness, in pat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haidan Lan, Xiaoshuang Zhou, Jing Xue, Bin Liu, Guo Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-12-01
Series:BMC Anesthesiology
Subjects:
TEE
SVV
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12871-017-0456-6
id doaj-e8d588f3858a4aeca4e1f7481db8d45f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e8d588f3858a4aeca4e1f7481db8d45f2020-11-25T03:12:12ZengBMCBMC Anesthesiology1471-22532017-12-011711610.1186/s12871-017-0456-6The ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations measured by TEE to monitor fluid responsiveness in high-risk surgical patients during craniotomy: a prospective cohort studyHaidan Lan0Xiaoshuang Zhou1Jing Xue2Bin Liu3Guo Chen4Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityAbstract Background This study was aimed to evaluate the ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations (LVEDVV) measured by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) compared with stroke volume variation (SVV) obtained by the FloTrac/Vigileo monitor to predict fluid responsiveness, in patients undergoing craniotomy with goal direct therapy. Methods We used SVV obtained by the FloTrac/Vigileo monitor to manage intraoperative hypotension in adult patients undergoing craniotomy (ASA III – IV) after obtaining IRB approval and informed consent. The LVEDVV were measured by TEE through the changes of left ventricular short diameter of axle simultaneously. When cardiac index (CI) ≤ 2.5 and SVV ≥ 15%, comparisons were made between the two devices before and after volume expansion. Results We enrolled twenty-six patients referred for craniotomy in this study and 145 pairs of data were obtained. Mean Vigileo-SVV and TEE-LVEDVV were 17.8 ± 2.78% and 22.1 ± 7.25% before volume expansion respectively, and were 10.95 ± 2.8% and 13.58 ± 3.78% after volume expansion respectively (P < 0.001). The relationship between Vigileo-SVV and TEE-LVEDVV was significant (r2 = 0.55; p < 0.001). Agreement between Vigileo-SVV and TEE-LVEDVV was 3.3% ± 3.9% (mean bias ± SD, Bland-Altman). Conclusions For fluid responsiveness of patients during craniotomy in ASA III-IV, LVEDVV measured by left ventricular short diameter of axle using M type echocaidiographic measurement seems an acceptable monitoring indicator. This accessible method has promising clinical applications in situations where volume and cardiac function monitoring is of great importance during surgery. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-TRC-13003583 , August 20, 2013.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12871-017-0456-6TEESVVLeft ventricular end-diastolic volumeFluid responsiveness measurement
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Haidan Lan
Xiaoshuang Zhou
Jing Xue
Bin Liu
Guo Chen
spellingShingle Haidan Lan
Xiaoshuang Zhou
Jing Xue
Bin Liu
Guo Chen
The ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations measured by TEE to monitor fluid responsiveness in high-risk surgical patients during craniotomy: a prospective cohort study
BMC Anesthesiology
TEE
SVV
Left ventricular end-diastolic volume
Fluid responsiveness measurement
author_facet Haidan Lan
Xiaoshuang Zhou
Jing Xue
Bin Liu
Guo Chen
author_sort Haidan Lan
title The ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations measured by TEE to monitor fluid responsiveness in high-risk surgical patients during craniotomy: a prospective cohort study
title_short The ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations measured by TEE to monitor fluid responsiveness in high-risk surgical patients during craniotomy: a prospective cohort study
title_full The ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations measured by TEE to monitor fluid responsiveness in high-risk surgical patients during craniotomy: a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr The ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations measured by TEE to monitor fluid responsiveness in high-risk surgical patients during craniotomy: a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed The ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations measured by TEE to monitor fluid responsiveness in high-risk surgical patients during craniotomy: a prospective cohort study
title_sort ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations measured by tee to monitor fluid responsiveness in high-risk surgical patients during craniotomy: a prospective cohort study
publisher BMC
series BMC Anesthesiology
issn 1471-2253
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Abstract Background This study was aimed to evaluate the ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations (LVEDVV) measured by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) compared with stroke volume variation (SVV) obtained by the FloTrac/Vigileo monitor to predict fluid responsiveness, in patients undergoing craniotomy with goal direct therapy. Methods We used SVV obtained by the FloTrac/Vigileo monitor to manage intraoperative hypotension in adult patients undergoing craniotomy (ASA III – IV) after obtaining IRB approval and informed consent. The LVEDVV were measured by TEE through the changes of left ventricular short diameter of axle simultaneously. When cardiac index (CI) ≤ 2.5 and SVV ≥ 15%, comparisons were made between the two devices before and after volume expansion. Results We enrolled twenty-six patients referred for craniotomy in this study and 145 pairs of data were obtained. Mean Vigileo-SVV and TEE-LVEDVV were 17.8 ± 2.78% and 22.1 ± 7.25% before volume expansion respectively, and were 10.95 ± 2.8% and 13.58 ± 3.78% after volume expansion respectively (P < 0.001). The relationship between Vigileo-SVV and TEE-LVEDVV was significant (r2 = 0.55; p < 0.001). Agreement between Vigileo-SVV and TEE-LVEDVV was 3.3% ± 3.9% (mean bias ± SD, Bland-Altman). Conclusions For fluid responsiveness of patients during craniotomy in ASA III-IV, LVEDVV measured by left ventricular short diameter of axle using M type echocaidiographic measurement seems an acceptable monitoring indicator. This accessible method has promising clinical applications in situations where volume and cardiac function monitoring is of great importance during surgery. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-TRC-13003583 , August 20, 2013.
topic TEE
SVV
Left ventricular end-diastolic volume
Fluid responsiveness measurement
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12871-017-0456-6
work_keys_str_mv AT haidanlan theabilityofleftventricularenddiastolicvolumevariationsmeasuredbyteetomonitorfluidresponsivenessinhighrisksurgicalpatientsduringcraniotomyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT xiaoshuangzhou theabilityofleftventricularenddiastolicvolumevariationsmeasuredbyteetomonitorfluidresponsivenessinhighrisksurgicalpatientsduringcraniotomyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT jingxue theabilityofleftventricularenddiastolicvolumevariationsmeasuredbyteetomonitorfluidresponsivenessinhighrisksurgicalpatientsduringcraniotomyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT binliu theabilityofleftventricularenddiastolicvolumevariationsmeasuredbyteetomonitorfluidresponsivenessinhighrisksurgicalpatientsduringcraniotomyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT guochen theabilityofleftventricularenddiastolicvolumevariationsmeasuredbyteetomonitorfluidresponsivenessinhighrisksurgicalpatientsduringcraniotomyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT haidanlan abilityofleftventricularenddiastolicvolumevariationsmeasuredbyteetomonitorfluidresponsivenessinhighrisksurgicalpatientsduringcraniotomyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT xiaoshuangzhou abilityofleftventricularenddiastolicvolumevariationsmeasuredbyteetomonitorfluidresponsivenessinhighrisksurgicalpatientsduringcraniotomyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT jingxue abilityofleftventricularenddiastolicvolumevariationsmeasuredbyteetomonitorfluidresponsivenessinhighrisksurgicalpatientsduringcraniotomyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT binliu abilityofleftventricularenddiastolicvolumevariationsmeasuredbyteetomonitorfluidresponsivenessinhighrisksurgicalpatientsduringcraniotomyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT guochen abilityofleftventricularenddiastolicvolumevariationsmeasuredbyteetomonitorfluidresponsivenessinhighrisksurgicalpatientsduringcraniotomyaprospectivecohortstudy
_version_ 1724650952931147776