More time, more work: How time limits bias estimates of task scope and project duration
We propose that externally induced time limits on a task overly affect predictions of other people’s completion times for that task, due to an over-generalized association between the time available and inferred task scope. We find higher estimates of the time needed to complete a given task by ano...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Society for Judgment and Decision Making
2020-11-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.sjdm.org/19/190918a/jdm190918a.pdf |
id |
doaj-e8bd054766314ba08772f24e8f585417 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e8bd054766314ba08772f24e8f5854172021-05-02T23:31:34ZengSociety for Judgment and Decision MakingJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752020-11-011569941008More time, more work: How time limits bias estimates of task scope and project durationIndranil GoswamiOleg UrminskyWe propose that externally induced time limits on a task overly affect predictions of other people’s completion times for that task, due to an over-generalized association between the time available and inferred task scope. We find higher estimates of the time needed to complete a given task by another person when the time limit is longer. While such predictions could be normative when time limits are informative, the effect persists even when the decision-maker knows that the limit is arbitrary and is unknown to the other person, and therefore, cannot affect behavior. Perception of task scope mediates the relationship between time limits and completion time estimates, and weakening the association between time limits and task scope attenuates the effect. The over-learned cognitive bias persists even among experienced decision-makers making estimates in a familiar setting. Our findings have implications for people who make decisions that use judgments of others’ task completion time as an input.http://journal.sjdm.org/19/190918a/jdm190918a.pdftime limits; deadlines; time judgments; estimation bias; over-learned responsesnakeywords |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Indranil Goswami Oleg Urminsky |
spellingShingle |
Indranil Goswami Oleg Urminsky More time, more work: How time limits bias estimates of task scope and project duration Judgment and Decision Making time limits; deadlines; time judgments; estimation bias; over-learned responsesnakeywords |
author_facet |
Indranil Goswami Oleg Urminsky |
author_sort |
Indranil Goswami |
title |
More time, more
work: How time limits bias estimates of task scope and project duration |
title_short |
More time, more
work: How time limits bias estimates of task scope and project duration |
title_full |
More time, more
work: How time limits bias estimates of task scope and project duration |
title_fullStr |
More time, more
work: How time limits bias estimates of task scope and project duration |
title_full_unstemmed |
More time, more
work: How time limits bias estimates of task scope and project duration |
title_sort |
more time, more
work: how time limits bias estimates of task scope and project duration |
publisher |
Society for Judgment and Decision Making |
series |
Judgment and Decision Making |
issn |
1930-2975 |
publishDate |
2020-11-01 |
description |
We propose that
externally induced time limits on a task overly affect predictions of other
people’s completion times for that task, due to an over-generalized association
between the time available and inferred task scope. We find higher estimates
of the time needed to complete a given task by another person when the time
limit is longer. While such predictions could be normative when time limits are
informative, the effect persists even when the decision-maker knows that the
limit is arbitrary and is unknown to the other person, and therefore, cannot
affect behavior. Perception of task scope mediates the relationship between
time limits and completion time estimates, and weakening the association
between time limits and task scope attenuates the effect. The over-learned
cognitive bias persists even among experienced decision-makers making estimates
in a familiar setting. Our findings have implications for people who make
decisions that use judgments of others’ task completion time as an input. |
topic |
time limits; deadlines; time judgments; estimation bias; over-learned responsesnakeywords |
url |
http://journal.sjdm.org/19/190918a/jdm190918a.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT indranilgoswami moretimemoreworkhowtimelimitsbiasestimatesoftaskscopeandprojectduration AT olegurminsky moretimemoreworkhowtimelimitsbiasestimatesoftaskscopeandprojectduration |
_version_ |
1721486680532189184 |