A comparative study of single nucleotide variant detection performance using three massively parallel sequencing methods.

Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) has revolutionised clinical genetics and research within human genetics by enabling the detection of variants in multiple genes in several samples at the same time. Today, multiple approaches for MPS of DNA are available, including targeted gene sequencing (TGS) p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Linea Christine Trudsø, Jeppe Dyrberg Andersen, Stine Bøttcher Jacobsen, Sofie Lindgren Christiansen, Clàudia Congost-Teixidor, Marie-Louise Kampmann, Niels Morling
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239850
id doaj-e8af0872cc3c41fdbfc940d33ca4c8b0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e8af0872cc3c41fdbfc940d33ca4c8b02021-03-03T22:10:26ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01159e023985010.1371/journal.pone.0239850A comparative study of single nucleotide variant detection performance using three massively parallel sequencing methods.Linea Christine TrudsøJeppe Dyrberg AndersenStine Bøttcher JacobsenSofie Lindgren ChristiansenClàudia Congost-TeixidorMarie-Louise KampmannNiels MorlingMassively parallel sequencing (MPS) has revolutionised clinical genetics and research within human genetics by enabling the detection of variants in multiple genes in several samples at the same time. Today, multiple approaches for MPS of DNA are available, including targeted gene sequencing (TGS) panels, whole exome sequencing (WES), and whole genome sequencing (WGS). As MPS is becoming an integrated part of the work in genetic laboratories, it is important to investigate the variant detection performance of the various MPS methods. We compared the results of single nucleotide variant (SNV) detection of three MPS methods: WGS, WES, and HaloPlex target enrichment sequencing (HES) using matched DNA of 10 individuals. The detection performance was investigated in 100 genes associated with cardiomyopathies and channelopathies. The results showed that WGS overall performed better than those of WES and HES. WGS had a more uniform and widespread coverage of the investigated regions compared to WES and HES, which both had a right-skewed coverage distribution and difficulties in covering regions and genes with high GC-content. WGS and WES showed roughly the same high sensitivities for detection of SNVs, whereas HES showed a lower sensitivity due to a higher number of false negative results.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239850
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Linea Christine Trudsø
Jeppe Dyrberg Andersen
Stine Bøttcher Jacobsen
Sofie Lindgren Christiansen
Clàudia Congost-Teixidor
Marie-Louise Kampmann
Niels Morling
spellingShingle Linea Christine Trudsø
Jeppe Dyrberg Andersen
Stine Bøttcher Jacobsen
Sofie Lindgren Christiansen
Clàudia Congost-Teixidor
Marie-Louise Kampmann
Niels Morling
A comparative study of single nucleotide variant detection performance using three massively parallel sequencing methods.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Linea Christine Trudsø
Jeppe Dyrberg Andersen
Stine Bøttcher Jacobsen
Sofie Lindgren Christiansen
Clàudia Congost-Teixidor
Marie-Louise Kampmann
Niels Morling
author_sort Linea Christine Trudsø
title A comparative study of single nucleotide variant detection performance using three massively parallel sequencing methods.
title_short A comparative study of single nucleotide variant detection performance using three massively parallel sequencing methods.
title_full A comparative study of single nucleotide variant detection performance using three massively parallel sequencing methods.
title_fullStr A comparative study of single nucleotide variant detection performance using three massively parallel sequencing methods.
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of single nucleotide variant detection performance using three massively parallel sequencing methods.
title_sort comparative study of single nucleotide variant detection performance using three massively parallel sequencing methods.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) has revolutionised clinical genetics and research within human genetics by enabling the detection of variants in multiple genes in several samples at the same time. Today, multiple approaches for MPS of DNA are available, including targeted gene sequencing (TGS) panels, whole exome sequencing (WES), and whole genome sequencing (WGS). As MPS is becoming an integrated part of the work in genetic laboratories, it is important to investigate the variant detection performance of the various MPS methods. We compared the results of single nucleotide variant (SNV) detection of three MPS methods: WGS, WES, and HaloPlex target enrichment sequencing (HES) using matched DNA of 10 individuals. The detection performance was investigated in 100 genes associated with cardiomyopathies and channelopathies. The results showed that WGS overall performed better than those of WES and HES. WGS had a more uniform and widespread coverage of the investigated regions compared to WES and HES, which both had a right-skewed coverage distribution and difficulties in covering regions and genes with high GC-content. WGS and WES showed roughly the same high sensitivities for detection of SNVs, whereas HES showed a lower sensitivity due to a higher number of false negative results.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239850
work_keys_str_mv AT lineachristinetrudsø acomparativestudyofsinglenucleotidevariantdetectionperformanceusingthreemassivelyparallelsequencingmethods
AT jeppedyrbergandersen acomparativestudyofsinglenucleotidevariantdetectionperformanceusingthreemassivelyparallelsequencingmethods
AT stinebøttcherjacobsen acomparativestudyofsinglenucleotidevariantdetectionperformanceusingthreemassivelyparallelsequencingmethods
AT sofielindgrenchristiansen acomparativestudyofsinglenucleotidevariantdetectionperformanceusingthreemassivelyparallelsequencingmethods
AT claudiacongostteixidor acomparativestudyofsinglenucleotidevariantdetectionperformanceusingthreemassivelyparallelsequencingmethods
AT marielouisekampmann acomparativestudyofsinglenucleotidevariantdetectionperformanceusingthreemassivelyparallelsequencingmethods
AT nielsmorling acomparativestudyofsinglenucleotidevariantdetectionperformanceusingthreemassivelyparallelsequencingmethods
AT lineachristinetrudsø comparativestudyofsinglenucleotidevariantdetectionperformanceusingthreemassivelyparallelsequencingmethods
AT jeppedyrbergandersen comparativestudyofsinglenucleotidevariantdetectionperformanceusingthreemassivelyparallelsequencingmethods
AT stinebøttcherjacobsen comparativestudyofsinglenucleotidevariantdetectionperformanceusingthreemassivelyparallelsequencingmethods
AT sofielindgrenchristiansen comparativestudyofsinglenucleotidevariantdetectionperformanceusingthreemassivelyparallelsequencingmethods
AT claudiacongostteixidor comparativestudyofsinglenucleotidevariantdetectionperformanceusingthreemassivelyparallelsequencingmethods
AT marielouisekampmann comparativestudyofsinglenucleotidevariantdetectionperformanceusingthreemassivelyparallelsequencingmethods
AT nielsmorling comparativestudyofsinglenucleotidevariantdetectionperformanceusingthreemassivelyparallelsequencingmethods
_version_ 1714813284717166592