Talking about the weather: Two construals of precipitation events in English

Weather expressions such as It is raining have proven challenging for linguistic researchers; not only do weather expressions often have special linguistic properties, but languages show considerable variation in the morphosyntactic expression of such events. The main claim pursued here is that, in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beth Levin, Bonnie Krejci
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Library of Humanities 2019-06-01
Series:Glossa
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/794
id doaj-e884a44a8cf84310ba9a92c5c128a5d9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e884a44a8cf84310ba9a92c5c128a5d92021-09-02T08:23:29ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesGlossa2397-18352019-06-014110.5334/gjgl.794364Talking about the weather: Two construals of precipitation events in EnglishBeth Levin0Bonnie Krejci1Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall, Stanford, CAStanford University, 450 Serra Mall, Stanford, CAWeather expressions such as It is raining have proven challenging for linguistic researchers; not only do weather expressions often have special linguistic properties, but languages show considerable variation in the morphosyntactic expression of such events. The main claim pursued here is that, in English, precipitation happenings can be linguistically construed as events (in the sense of Levin & Rappaport Hovav 2005) in two ways: as substance emission events—the sky is construed as emitting the precipitation—or as directed motion events—the precipitation is construed as moving down towards the earth due to gravity. Each construal involves a distinct event structure and, thus, is associated with its own pattern of syntactic behavior. When a precipitation happening is construed as a substance emission event, a type of activity, the verb expressing it shows the hallmarks of an unergative. When a precipitation happening or a substance emission happening is construed as a directed motion event, a type of scalar change event, the verb expressing it shows the hallmarks of an unaccusative. This paper focuses on English, but briefly discusses how the proposed analysis of English can illuminate the diverse behavior of weather verbs across languages. The availability of two construals sheds light on the expression of precipitation events in Romance languages, particularly on the continuing controversy about whether weather verbs are unaccusative or unergative.https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/794argument realizationevent structureunergativityunaccusativityweather verbsprecipitation verbsemission verbs
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Beth Levin
Bonnie Krejci
spellingShingle Beth Levin
Bonnie Krejci
Talking about the weather: Two construals of precipitation events in English
Glossa
argument realization
event structure
unergativity
unaccusativity
weather verbs
precipitation verbs
emission verbs
author_facet Beth Levin
Bonnie Krejci
author_sort Beth Levin
title Talking about the weather: Two construals of precipitation events in English
title_short Talking about the weather: Two construals of precipitation events in English
title_full Talking about the weather: Two construals of precipitation events in English
title_fullStr Talking about the weather: Two construals of precipitation events in English
title_full_unstemmed Talking about the weather: Two construals of precipitation events in English
title_sort talking about the weather: two construals of precipitation events in english
publisher Open Library of Humanities
series Glossa
issn 2397-1835
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Weather expressions such as It is raining have proven challenging for linguistic researchers; not only do weather expressions often have special linguistic properties, but languages show considerable variation in the morphosyntactic expression of such events. The main claim pursued here is that, in English, precipitation happenings can be linguistically construed as events (in the sense of Levin & Rappaport Hovav 2005) in two ways: as substance emission events—the sky is construed as emitting the precipitation—or as directed motion events—the precipitation is construed as moving down towards the earth due to gravity. Each construal involves a distinct event structure and, thus, is associated with its own pattern of syntactic behavior. When a precipitation happening is construed as a substance emission event, a type of activity, the verb expressing it shows the hallmarks of an unergative. When a precipitation happening or a substance emission happening is construed as a directed motion event, a type of scalar change event, the verb expressing it shows the hallmarks of an unaccusative. This paper focuses on English, but briefly discusses how the proposed analysis of English can illuminate the diverse behavior of weather verbs across languages. The availability of two construals sheds light on the expression of precipitation events in Romance languages, particularly on the continuing controversy about whether weather verbs are unaccusative or unergative.
topic argument realization
event structure
unergativity
unaccusativity
weather verbs
precipitation verbs
emission verbs
url https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/794
work_keys_str_mv AT bethlevin talkingabouttheweathertwoconstrualsofprecipitationeventsinenglish
AT bonniekrejci talkingabouttheweathertwoconstrualsofprecipitationeventsinenglish
_version_ 1721177805775962112