Does Existence Precede Essence? Existentialism And Avicenna

Existentialism is one of the important matters of philosophy as a current in the centre of discussion as to whether existence precedes essence or essence precedes existence. In order to remove the obstacles in front of human freedom, Sartre argues that existence precedes essence. If existence preced...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Eyüp ŞAHİN
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Ankara University 2017-01-01
Series:Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dtcfdergisi.ankara.edu.tr/index.php/dtcf/article/view/166
id doaj-e8746ebc956c4f2394785efdb602a0b7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e8746ebc956c4f2394785efdb602a0b72020-11-24T22:16:24ZdeuAnkara UniversityAnkara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi2459-01502017-01-01541235Does Existence Precede Essence? Existentialism And AvicennaEyüp ŞAHİN0Ankara Üniversitesi. eyupsahin@ankara.edu.trExistentialism is one of the important matters of philosophy as a current in the centre of discussion as to whether existence precedes essence or essence precedes existence. In order to remove the obstacles in front of human freedom, Sartre argues that existence precedes essence. If existence precedes essence, man himself, will create his essence, and thus will be responsible for his actions. In this way of thinking, there is no necessity for the existence of God. According to Avicenna, the source of essence (māhiyya) is God himself as a necessary being. Therefore, man is not the source of his own existence, thus it is impossible to argue a concept of unlimited freedom. According to him, the physical and psychological necessity of universe is a result of metaphysical necessity, since God is the necessary being. In this article, the questions whether ‘the I’ of man can be regarded, according to Avicenna, as a starting point and whether one can doubt about the nature of existence, its perception, its knowledge, about it are sought to answer. Besides, the possibility of making a connection between ‘existentialism’ that has been identified in philosophy with Sartre, which focuses on such concepts as ‘existence,’ ‘essence’ and ‘will’ and Avicenna, on basis of the fact that how Avicenna explained and grounded these terms much earlier than existentialism. Is it possible to make a comparison between ‘the conscience’ of existentialism and ‘flying man’ of Avicenna? It is also aimed in this article to make an assessment if there are distinctive and parallel points in the relationship established by Avicenna between existence and essence and the views put by Descartes and philosophers after him.http://dtcfdergisi.ankara.edu.tr/index.php/dtcf/article/view/166Zorunlu VarlıkVarlıkMâhiyetİradeSorumlulukOluşBilinçUçan Adam
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eyüp ŞAHİN
spellingShingle Eyüp ŞAHİN
Does Existence Precede Essence? Existentialism And Avicenna
Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi
Zorunlu Varlık
Varlık
Mâhiyet
İrade
Sorumluluk
Oluş
Bilinç
Uçan Adam
author_facet Eyüp ŞAHİN
author_sort Eyüp ŞAHİN
title Does Existence Precede Essence? Existentialism And Avicenna
title_short Does Existence Precede Essence? Existentialism And Avicenna
title_full Does Existence Precede Essence? Existentialism And Avicenna
title_fullStr Does Existence Precede Essence? Existentialism And Avicenna
title_full_unstemmed Does Existence Precede Essence? Existentialism And Avicenna
title_sort does existence precede essence? existentialism and avicenna
publisher Ankara University
series Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi
issn 2459-0150
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Existentialism is one of the important matters of philosophy as a current in the centre of discussion as to whether existence precedes essence or essence precedes existence. In order to remove the obstacles in front of human freedom, Sartre argues that existence precedes essence. If existence precedes essence, man himself, will create his essence, and thus will be responsible for his actions. In this way of thinking, there is no necessity for the existence of God. According to Avicenna, the source of essence (māhiyya) is God himself as a necessary being. Therefore, man is not the source of his own existence, thus it is impossible to argue a concept of unlimited freedom. According to him, the physical and psychological necessity of universe is a result of metaphysical necessity, since God is the necessary being. In this article, the questions whether ‘the I’ of man can be regarded, according to Avicenna, as a starting point and whether one can doubt about the nature of existence, its perception, its knowledge, about it are sought to answer. Besides, the possibility of making a connection between ‘existentialism’ that has been identified in philosophy with Sartre, which focuses on such concepts as ‘existence,’ ‘essence’ and ‘will’ and Avicenna, on basis of the fact that how Avicenna explained and grounded these terms much earlier than existentialism. Is it possible to make a comparison between ‘the conscience’ of existentialism and ‘flying man’ of Avicenna? It is also aimed in this article to make an assessment if there are distinctive and parallel points in the relationship established by Avicenna between existence and essence and the views put by Descartes and philosophers after him.
topic Zorunlu Varlık
Varlık
Mâhiyet
İrade
Sorumluluk
Oluş
Bilinç
Uçan Adam
url http://dtcfdergisi.ankara.edu.tr/index.php/dtcf/article/view/166
work_keys_str_mv AT eyupsahin doesexistenceprecedeessenceexistentialismandavicenna
_version_ 1725790032723181568