EMR fines test Trump administration's opposition to bureaucracy

No abstract available. Article truncated at 150 words. Earlier this week the Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) released an audit report on $6.1 billion paid to 250,000 clinicians in the incentive program for meaningful use of electronic medical records (EMRs) (1). A random...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Robbins RA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Arizona Thoracic Society 2017-06-01
Series:Southwest Journal of Pulmonary and Critical Care
Subjects:
EMR
EHR
HHS
Online Access:http://www.swjpcc.com/editorial/2017/6/17/emr-fines-test-trump-administrations-opposition-to-bureaucra.html
id doaj-e86f9ded8961449e847163626736a615
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e86f9ded8961449e847163626736a6152020-11-24T21:22:49ZengArizona Thoracic SocietySouthwest Journal of Pulmonary and Critical Care2160-67732017-06-0114631231410.13175/swjpcc079-17EMR fines test Trump administration's opposition to bureaucracyRobbins RA0Phoenix Pulmonary and Critical Care Research and Education Foundation, Gilbert, AZ USANo abstract available. Article truncated at 150 words. Earlier this week the Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) released an audit report on $6.1 billion paid to 250,000 clinicians in the incentive program for meaningful use of electronic medical records (EMRs) (1). A random sample of 100 clinicians who had received at least one incentive payment revealed that 14 of them who had had not met all meaningful use requirements as they had attested (Table 1) (1,2). Table 1. Meaningful use deficiencies identified in 14 of 100 clinicians. • Six clinicians couldn't provide a mandatory analysis of security risks; • Four clinicians couldn't prove that they had generated at least one list of patients-another requirement -who had the same condition; • Three clinicians could not provide patient encounter data to document that they had met various meaningful use measures; • One clinician had 90-days' worth of patient encounter data when a year's worth was needed; • One clinician did not …http://www.swjpcc.com/editorial/2017/6/17/emr-fines-test-trump-administrations-opposition-to-bureaucra.htmlEMREHRelectronic health care recordelectronic medical recordauditHHSHealth and Human ServicesTom PriceTrumpbureaucracy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Robbins RA
spellingShingle Robbins RA
EMR fines test Trump administration's opposition to bureaucracy
Southwest Journal of Pulmonary and Critical Care
EMR
EHR
electronic health care record
electronic medical record
audit
HHS
Health and Human Services
Tom Price
Trump
bureaucracy
author_facet Robbins RA
author_sort Robbins RA
title EMR fines test Trump administration's opposition to bureaucracy
title_short EMR fines test Trump administration's opposition to bureaucracy
title_full EMR fines test Trump administration's opposition to bureaucracy
title_fullStr EMR fines test Trump administration's opposition to bureaucracy
title_full_unstemmed EMR fines test Trump administration's opposition to bureaucracy
title_sort emr fines test trump administration's opposition to bureaucracy
publisher Arizona Thoracic Society
series Southwest Journal of Pulmonary and Critical Care
issn 2160-6773
publishDate 2017-06-01
description No abstract available. Article truncated at 150 words. Earlier this week the Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) released an audit report on $6.1 billion paid to 250,000 clinicians in the incentive program for meaningful use of electronic medical records (EMRs) (1). A random sample of 100 clinicians who had received at least one incentive payment revealed that 14 of them who had had not met all meaningful use requirements as they had attested (Table 1) (1,2). Table 1. Meaningful use deficiencies identified in 14 of 100 clinicians. • Six clinicians couldn't provide a mandatory analysis of security risks; • Four clinicians couldn't prove that they had generated at least one list of patients-another requirement -who had the same condition; • Three clinicians could not provide patient encounter data to document that they had met various meaningful use measures; • One clinician had 90-days' worth of patient encounter data when a year's worth was needed; • One clinician did not …
topic EMR
EHR
electronic health care record
electronic medical record
audit
HHS
Health and Human Services
Tom Price
Trump
bureaucracy
url http://www.swjpcc.com/editorial/2017/6/17/emr-fines-test-trump-administrations-opposition-to-bureaucra.html
work_keys_str_mv AT robbinsra emrfinestesttrumpadministrationsoppositiontobureaucracy
_version_ 1725994640021127168