Two-sided asymmetric subduction; implications for tectonomagmatic and metallogenic evolution of the Lut Block, eastern Iran

West directed subduction zones show common characteristics, such as low structural elevation, deep trench, steep slab and a conjugate back-arc basin that are opposite to those of the east directed subduction zones. The tectonomagmatic and metallogenic setting of the Lut Block is still a matter of de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reza Arjmandzadeh, Mohammad Hassan Karimpour, Seyed Ahmad Mazaheri, Jose Francisco Santos, Jorge Manuel Medina, Seyed Masoud Homam
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Ferdowsi University of Mashhad 2011-07-01
Series:Journal of Economic Geology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://econg.um.ac.ir/index.php/econg/article/view/11445
id doaj-e86e39d7143747d0b4e563874d9347b6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e86e39d7143747d0b4e563874d9347b62020-11-25T02:05:23ZfasFerdowsi University of MashhadJournal of Economic Geology2008-73062011-07-0131173010.22067/econg.v3i1.11445Two-sided asymmetric subduction; implications for tectonomagmatic and metallogenic evolution of the Lut Block, eastern Iran Reza Arjmandzadeh0Mohammad Hassan Karimpour1Seyed Ahmad Mazaheri2Jose Francisco Santos3Jorge Manuel Medina4Seyed Masoud Homam5Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, IranDepartment of Geology, Faculty of Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, IranDepartment of Geology, Faculty of Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, IranDepartment of Geosciences, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, PortugalDepartment of Geosciences, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, PortugalDepartment of Geology, Faculty of Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, IranWest directed subduction zones show common characteristics, such as low structural elevation, deep trench, steep slab and a conjugate back-arc basin that are opposite to those of the east directed subduction zones. The tectonomagmatic and metallogenic setting of the Lut Block is still a matter of debate and several hypotheses have been put forward. Despite some authors denying the influence of the operation of Benioff planes, the majority propose that it occurred beneath the Afghan Block, while others consider that oceanic lithosphere was dragged under the Lut Block. Cu-Au porphyry deposits seem to occur in an island arc geotectonic setting during the middle Eocene while Mo-bearing deposits are coincident with the crustal thickening during Oligocene. We introduce new trace element and isotope geochemical data for granitoids and structural evidences testifying the two-sided asymmetric subduction beneath both Afghan and Lut Blocks, with different rates of consumption of oceanic lithosphere. https://econg.um.ac.ir/index.php/econg/article/view/11445asymmetric subductiontectono-magmaticLut BlockAfghan Blockisotope geochemical data
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Reza Arjmandzadeh
Mohammad Hassan Karimpour
Seyed Ahmad Mazaheri
Jose Francisco Santos
Jorge Manuel Medina
Seyed Masoud Homam
spellingShingle Reza Arjmandzadeh
Mohammad Hassan Karimpour
Seyed Ahmad Mazaheri
Jose Francisco Santos
Jorge Manuel Medina
Seyed Masoud Homam
Two-sided asymmetric subduction; implications for tectonomagmatic and metallogenic evolution of the Lut Block, eastern Iran
Journal of Economic Geology
asymmetric subduction
tectono-magmatic
Lut Block
Afghan Block
isotope geochemical data
author_facet Reza Arjmandzadeh
Mohammad Hassan Karimpour
Seyed Ahmad Mazaheri
Jose Francisco Santos
Jorge Manuel Medina
Seyed Masoud Homam
author_sort Reza Arjmandzadeh
title Two-sided asymmetric subduction; implications for tectonomagmatic and metallogenic evolution of the Lut Block, eastern Iran
title_short Two-sided asymmetric subduction; implications for tectonomagmatic and metallogenic evolution of the Lut Block, eastern Iran
title_full Two-sided asymmetric subduction; implications for tectonomagmatic and metallogenic evolution of the Lut Block, eastern Iran
title_fullStr Two-sided asymmetric subduction; implications for tectonomagmatic and metallogenic evolution of the Lut Block, eastern Iran
title_full_unstemmed Two-sided asymmetric subduction; implications for tectonomagmatic and metallogenic evolution of the Lut Block, eastern Iran
title_sort two-sided asymmetric subduction; implications for tectonomagmatic and metallogenic evolution of the lut block, eastern iran
publisher Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
series Journal of Economic Geology
issn 2008-7306
publishDate 2011-07-01
description West directed subduction zones show common characteristics, such as low structural elevation, deep trench, steep slab and a conjugate back-arc basin that are opposite to those of the east directed subduction zones. The tectonomagmatic and metallogenic setting of the Lut Block is still a matter of debate and several hypotheses have been put forward. Despite some authors denying the influence of the operation of Benioff planes, the majority propose that it occurred beneath the Afghan Block, while others consider that oceanic lithosphere was dragged under the Lut Block. Cu-Au porphyry deposits seem to occur in an island arc geotectonic setting during the middle Eocene while Mo-bearing deposits are coincident with the crustal thickening during Oligocene. We introduce new trace element and isotope geochemical data for granitoids and structural evidences testifying the two-sided asymmetric subduction beneath both Afghan and Lut Blocks, with different rates of consumption of oceanic lithosphere.
topic asymmetric subduction
tectono-magmatic
Lut Block
Afghan Block
isotope geochemical data
url https://econg.um.ac.ir/index.php/econg/article/view/11445
work_keys_str_mv AT rezaarjmandzadeh twosidedasymmetricsubductionimplicationsfortectonomagmaticandmetallogenicevolutionofthelutblockeasterniran
AT mohammadhassankarimpour twosidedasymmetricsubductionimplicationsfortectonomagmaticandmetallogenicevolutionofthelutblockeasterniran
AT seyedahmadmazaheri twosidedasymmetricsubductionimplicationsfortectonomagmaticandmetallogenicevolutionofthelutblockeasterniran
AT josefranciscosantos twosidedasymmetricsubductionimplicationsfortectonomagmaticandmetallogenicevolutionofthelutblockeasterniran
AT jorgemanuelmedina twosidedasymmetricsubductionimplicationsfortectonomagmaticandmetallogenicevolutionofthelutblockeasterniran
AT seyedmasoudhomam twosidedasymmetricsubductionimplicationsfortectonomagmaticandmetallogenicevolutionofthelutblockeasterniran
_version_ 1724938274160508928