Influence of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on patients receiving lung resection: a retrospective study of 1749 cases

Abstract Background The study aimed to evaluate the outcomes following the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. Method A retrospective cohort study involving 1749 patients with lung cancer undergoing pulmonary resection was conducted....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chunmei Wang, Yutian Lai, Pengfei Li, Jianhuan Su, Guowei Che
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-03-01
Series:BMC Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00960-z
id doaj-e8526c2b6dce46a194b289e0dae30dbf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e8526c2b6dce46a194b289e0dae30dbf2021-03-11T11:53:19ZengBMCBMC Surgery1471-24822021-03-012111810.1186/s12893-020-00960-zInfluence of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on patients receiving lung resection: a retrospective study of 1749 casesChunmei Wang0Yutian Lai1Pengfei Li2Jianhuan Su3Guowei Che4Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityLung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityRehabilitation Department, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityAbstract Background The study aimed to evaluate the outcomes following the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. Method A retrospective cohort study involving 1749 patients with lung cancer undergoing pulmonary resection was conducted. The patients were divided into two time period groups for analysis (routine pathway and ERAS pathway). Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the risks of developing postoperative pulmonary complications. Results Among the 1749 patients, 691 were stratified into the ERAS group, and 1058 in to the routine group. The ERAS group presented with shorter postoperative in-hospital length of stay (LOS) (4.0 vs 6.0, P < 0.001), total LOS (10.0 vs. 13.0 days, P < 0.001), and lower total in-hospital costs (P < 0.001), including material (P < 0.001) and drug expenses (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the ERAS group also presented with a lower occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) than the routine group (15.2% vs. 19.5%, P = 0.022). Likewise, a significantly lower occurrence of pneumonia (8.4% vs. 14.2%, P < 0.001) and atelectasis (5.9% vs. 9.8%, P = 0.004) was found in the ERAS group. Regarding the binary logistic regression, the ERAS intervention was the sole independent factor for the occurrence of PPCs (OR: 0.601, 95% CI 0.434–0.824, P = 0.002). In addition, age (OR: 1.032, 95% CI 1.018–1.046), COPD (OR: 1.792, 95% CI 1.196–2.686), and FEV1 (OR: 0.205, 95% CI 0.125–0.339) were also independent predictors of PPCs. Conclusion Implementation of an ERAS pathway shows improved postoperative outcomes, including shortened LOS, lower in-hospital costs, and reduced occurrence of PPCs, providing benefits to the postoperative recovery of patients with lung cancer undergoing surgical treatment.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00960-zEnhanced recovery after surgeryLung cancerPostoperative pulmonary complicationsThoracic surgery
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chunmei Wang
Yutian Lai
Pengfei Li
Jianhuan Su
Guowei Che
spellingShingle Chunmei Wang
Yutian Lai
Pengfei Li
Jianhuan Su
Guowei Che
Influence of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on patients receiving lung resection: a retrospective study of 1749 cases
BMC Surgery
Enhanced recovery after surgery
Lung cancer
Postoperative pulmonary complications
Thoracic surgery
author_facet Chunmei Wang
Yutian Lai
Pengfei Li
Jianhuan Su
Guowei Che
author_sort Chunmei Wang
title Influence of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on patients receiving lung resection: a retrospective study of 1749 cases
title_short Influence of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on patients receiving lung resection: a retrospective study of 1749 cases
title_full Influence of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on patients receiving lung resection: a retrospective study of 1749 cases
title_fullStr Influence of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on patients receiving lung resection: a retrospective study of 1749 cases
title_full_unstemmed Influence of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on patients receiving lung resection: a retrospective study of 1749 cases
title_sort influence of enhanced recovery after surgery (eras) on patients receiving lung resection: a retrospective study of 1749 cases
publisher BMC
series BMC Surgery
issn 1471-2482
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Abstract Background The study aimed to evaluate the outcomes following the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. Method A retrospective cohort study involving 1749 patients with lung cancer undergoing pulmonary resection was conducted. The patients were divided into two time period groups for analysis (routine pathway and ERAS pathway). Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the risks of developing postoperative pulmonary complications. Results Among the 1749 patients, 691 were stratified into the ERAS group, and 1058 in to the routine group. The ERAS group presented with shorter postoperative in-hospital length of stay (LOS) (4.0 vs 6.0, P < 0.001), total LOS (10.0 vs. 13.0 days, P < 0.001), and lower total in-hospital costs (P < 0.001), including material (P < 0.001) and drug expenses (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the ERAS group also presented with a lower occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) than the routine group (15.2% vs. 19.5%, P = 0.022). Likewise, a significantly lower occurrence of pneumonia (8.4% vs. 14.2%, P < 0.001) and atelectasis (5.9% vs. 9.8%, P = 0.004) was found in the ERAS group. Regarding the binary logistic regression, the ERAS intervention was the sole independent factor for the occurrence of PPCs (OR: 0.601, 95% CI 0.434–0.824, P = 0.002). In addition, age (OR: 1.032, 95% CI 1.018–1.046), COPD (OR: 1.792, 95% CI 1.196–2.686), and FEV1 (OR: 0.205, 95% CI 0.125–0.339) were also independent predictors of PPCs. Conclusion Implementation of an ERAS pathway shows improved postoperative outcomes, including shortened LOS, lower in-hospital costs, and reduced occurrence of PPCs, providing benefits to the postoperative recovery of patients with lung cancer undergoing surgical treatment.
topic Enhanced recovery after surgery
Lung cancer
Postoperative pulmonary complications
Thoracic surgery
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00960-z
work_keys_str_mv AT chunmeiwang influenceofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasonpatientsreceivinglungresectionaretrospectivestudyof1749cases
AT yutianlai influenceofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasonpatientsreceivinglungresectionaretrospectivestudyof1749cases
AT pengfeili influenceofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasonpatientsreceivinglungresectionaretrospectivestudyof1749cases
AT jianhuansu influenceofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasonpatientsreceivinglungresectionaretrospectivestudyof1749cases
AT guoweiche influenceofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasonpatientsreceivinglungresectionaretrospectivestudyof1749cases
_version_ 1724225124099424256