Zusammenfassung und Kommentar zu: Smith et al.: Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions (Science 2009) [A Summary and Commentary on Smith et al.'s "Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions" (Science 2009)]

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Scheffer, Christian
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2011-02-01
Series:GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung
Online Access:http://www.egms.de/static/en/journals/zma/2011-28/zma000720.shtml
id doaj-e84edbcba3c84284a23c6972a11309b8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e84edbcba3c84284a23c6972a11309b82020-11-25T01:03:13ZdeuGerman Medical Science GMS Publishing HouseGMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung1860-74461860-35722011-02-01281Doc0810.3205/zma000720Zusammenfassung und Kommentar zu: Smith et al.: Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions (Science 2009) [A Summary and Commentary on Smith et al.'s "Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions" (Science 2009)]Scheffer, Christianhttp://www.egms.de/static/en/journals/zma/2011-28/zma000720.shtml
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Scheffer, Christian
spellingShingle Scheffer, Christian
Zusammenfassung und Kommentar zu: Smith et al.: Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions (Science 2009) [A Summary and Commentary on Smith et al.'s "Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions" (Science 2009)]
GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung
author_facet Scheffer, Christian
author_sort Scheffer, Christian
title Zusammenfassung und Kommentar zu: Smith et al.: Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions (Science 2009) [A Summary and Commentary on Smith et al.'s "Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions" (Science 2009)]
title_short Zusammenfassung und Kommentar zu: Smith et al.: Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions (Science 2009) [A Summary and Commentary on Smith et al.'s "Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions" (Science 2009)]
title_full Zusammenfassung und Kommentar zu: Smith et al.: Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions (Science 2009) [A Summary and Commentary on Smith et al.'s "Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions" (Science 2009)]
title_fullStr Zusammenfassung und Kommentar zu: Smith et al.: Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions (Science 2009) [A Summary and Commentary on Smith et al.'s "Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions" (Science 2009)]
title_full_unstemmed Zusammenfassung und Kommentar zu: Smith et al.: Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions (Science 2009) [A Summary and Commentary on Smith et al.'s "Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions" (Science 2009)]
title_sort zusammenfassung und kommentar zu: smith et al.: why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions (science 2009) [a summary and commentary on smith et al.'s "why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions" (science 2009)]
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
series GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung
issn 1860-7446
1860-3572
publishDate 2011-02-01
url http://www.egms.de/static/en/journals/zma/2011-28/zma000720.shtml
work_keys_str_mv AT schefferchristian zusammenfassungundkommentarzusmithetalwhypeerdiscussionimprovesstudentperformanceoninclassconceptquestionsscience2009asummaryandcommentaryonsmithetalsquotwhypeerdiscussionimprovesstudentperformanceoninclassconceptquestionsquotscience2009
_version_ 1725201654797565952