Revisiting the Sphere standards: comparing the revised Sphere standards to living standards in three urban informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya

Abstract Background Humanitarian actors have long used the Sphere Handbook and its minimum standards to guide operational practice. The new revision attempts to update these standards partly to address urban crises that have challenged the humanitarian system. Yet, these indicators have never been b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ronak B. Patel, Jay Chadhuri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-03-01
Series:Journal of International Humanitarian Action
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41018-019-0054-y
id doaj-e8466c94dfaa4270b6152811511de0dd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e8466c94dfaa4270b6152811511de0dd2020-11-25T02:56:33ZengSpringerOpenJournal of International Humanitarian Action2364-34122364-34042019-03-014111010.1186/s41018-019-0054-yRevisiting the Sphere standards: comparing the revised Sphere standards to living standards in three urban informal settlements in Nairobi, KenyaRonak B. Patel0Jay ChadhuriDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s HospitalAbstract Background Humanitarian actors have long used the Sphere Handbook and its minimum standards to guide operational practice. The new revision attempts to update these standards partly to address urban crises that have challenged the humanitarian system. Yet, these indicators have never been based on a substantial body of evidence or data from the varied living standards found in cities or specifically informal settlements. This study aims to contextualize the Sphere standards for urban populations by comparing a sample of the revised key indicators to living standards in three urban informal settlements of Nairobi, Kenya, during a non-crisis period to examine their relevance and applicability, and discuss the implications. Methods Retrospective analysis of data sourced from randomized household surveys of three informal settlements in Nairobi across a range of living standards including a convenience sample of Sphere metrics is quantitatively compared to the newly revised Sphere standards. Results The results show that while some standards are met, many of the urban poor in these settlements live far below the prescribed minimum standards across many key sectors including water, sanitation, shelter, and food security. The data also reveal variations between and within individual informal settlements. Conclusion The Sphere standards are not informed enough by informality and remain largely aspirational for some populations and consensus rather than evidence-based. The revised handbook has made significant strides in highlighting the need for contextualization, market approaches, and incorporating stakeholder input. The new Sphere standards must be placed into context for use in the new urban agenda realigning humanitarian actions towards more locally contextualized and driven practice.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41018-019-0054-yUrban slumInformal settlementSphere standardsUrban crisesMinimum standardsLocalizing aid
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ronak B. Patel
Jay Chadhuri
spellingShingle Ronak B. Patel
Jay Chadhuri
Revisiting the Sphere standards: comparing the revised Sphere standards to living standards in three urban informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya
Journal of International Humanitarian Action
Urban slum
Informal settlement
Sphere standards
Urban crises
Minimum standards
Localizing aid
author_facet Ronak B. Patel
Jay Chadhuri
author_sort Ronak B. Patel
title Revisiting the Sphere standards: comparing the revised Sphere standards to living standards in three urban informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya
title_short Revisiting the Sphere standards: comparing the revised Sphere standards to living standards in three urban informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya
title_full Revisiting the Sphere standards: comparing the revised Sphere standards to living standards in three urban informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya
title_fullStr Revisiting the Sphere standards: comparing the revised Sphere standards to living standards in three urban informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting the Sphere standards: comparing the revised Sphere standards to living standards in three urban informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya
title_sort revisiting the sphere standards: comparing the revised sphere standards to living standards in three urban informal settlements in nairobi, kenya
publisher SpringerOpen
series Journal of International Humanitarian Action
issn 2364-3412
2364-3404
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Abstract Background Humanitarian actors have long used the Sphere Handbook and its minimum standards to guide operational practice. The new revision attempts to update these standards partly to address urban crises that have challenged the humanitarian system. Yet, these indicators have never been based on a substantial body of evidence or data from the varied living standards found in cities or specifically informal settlements. This study aims to contextualize the Sphere standards for urban populations by comparing a sample of the revised key indicators to living standards in three urban informal settlements of Nairobi, Kenya, during a non-crisis period to examine their relevance and applicability, and discuss the implications. Methods Retrospective analysis of data sourced from randomized household surveys of three informal settlements in Nairobi across a range of living standards including a convenience sample of Sphere metrics is quantitatively compared to the newly revised Sphere standards. Results The results show that while some standards are met, many of the urban poor in these settlements live far below the prescribed minimum standards across many key sectors including water, sanitation, shelter, and food security. The data also reveal variations between and within individual informal settlements. Conclusion The Sphere standards are not informed enough by informality and remain largely aspirational for some populations and consensus rather than evidence-based. The revised handbook has made significant strides in highlighting the need for contextualization, market approaches, and incorporating stakeholder input. The new Sphere standards must be placed into context for use in the new urban agenda realigning humanitarian actions towards more locally contextualized and driven practice.
topic Urban slum
Informal settlement
Sphere standards
Urban crises
Minimum standards
Localizing aid
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41018-019-0054-y
work_keys_str_mv AT ronakbpatel revisitingthespherestandardscomparingtherevisedspherestandardstolivingstandardsinthreeurbaninformalsettlementsinnairobikenya
AT jaychadhuri revisitingthespherestandardscomparingtherevisedspherestandardstolivingstandardsinthreeurbaninformalsettlementsinnairobikenya
_version_ 1724713445501173760