Revisiting the Sphere standards: comparing the revised Sphere standards to living standards in three urban informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya
Abstract Background Humanitarian actors have long used the Sphere Handbook and its minimum standards to guide operational practice. The new revision attempts to update these standards partly to address urban crises that have challenged the humanitarian system. Yet, these indicators have never been b...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2019-03-01
|
Series: | Journal of International Humanitarian Action |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41018-019-0054-y |
id |
doaj-e8466c94dfaa4270b6152811511de0dd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e8466c94dfaa4270b6152811511de0dd2020-11-25T02:56:33ZengSpringerOpenJournal of International Humanitarian Action2364-34122364-34042019-03-014111010.1186/s41018-019-0054-yRevisiting the Sphere standards: comparing the revised Sphere standards to living standards in three urban informal settlements in Nairobi, KenyaRonak B. Patel0Jay ChadhuriDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s HospitalAbstract Background Humanitarian actors have long used the Sphere Handbook and its minimum standards to guide operational practice. The new revision attempts to update these standards partly to address urban crises that have challenged the humanitarian system. Yet, these indicators have never been based on a substantial body of evidence or data from the varied living standards found in cities or specifically informal settlements. This study aims to contextualize the Sphere standards for urban populations by comparing a sample of the revised key indicators to living standards in three urban informal settlements of Nairobi, Kenya, during a non-crisis period to examine their relevance and applicability, and discuss the implications. Methods Retrospective analysis of data sourced from randomized household surveys of three informal settlements in Nairobi across a range of living standards including a convenience sample of Sphere metrics is quantitatively compared to the newly revised Sphere standards. Results The results show that while some standards are met, many of the urban poor in these settlements live far below the prescribed minimum standards across many key sectors including water, sanitation, shelter, and food security. The data also reveal variations between and within individual informal settlements. Conclusion The Sphere standards are not informed enough by informality and remain largely aspirational for some populations and consensus rather than evidence-based. The revised handbook has made significant strides in highlighting the need for contextualization, market approaches, and incorporating stakeholder input. The new Sphere standards must be placed into context for use in the new urban agenda realigning humanitarian actions towards more locally contextualized and driven practice.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41018-019-0054-yUrban slumInformal settlementSphere standardsUrban crisesMinimum standardsLocalizing aid |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ronak B. Patel Jay Chadhuri |
spellingShingle |
Ronak B. Patel Jay Chadhuri Revisiting the Sphere standards: comparing the revised Sphere standards to living standards in three urban informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya Journal of International Humanitarian Action Urban slum Informal settlement Sphere standards Urban crises Minimum standards Localizing aid |
author_facet |
Ronak B. Patel Jay Chadhuri |
author_sort |
Ronak B. Patel |
title |
Revisiting the Sphere standards: comparing the revised Sphere standards to living standards in three urban informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya |
title_short |
Revisiting the Sphere standards: comparing the revised Sphere standards to living standards in three urban informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya |
title_full |
Revisiting the Sphere standards: comparing the revised Sphere standards to living standards in three urban informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya |
title_fullStr |
Revisiting the Sphere standards: comparing the revised Sphere standards to living standards in three urban informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya |
title_full_unstemmed |
Revisiting the Sphere standards: comparing the revised Sphere standards to living standards in three urban informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya |
title_sort |
revisiting the sphere standards: comparing the revised sphere standards to living standards in three urban informal settlements in nairobi, kenya |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
Journal of International Humanitarian Action |
issn |
2364-3412 2364-3404 |
publishDate |
2019-03-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Humanitarian actors have long used the Sphere Handbook and its minimum standards to guide operational practice. The new revision attempts to update these standards partly to address urban crises that have challenged the humanitarian system. Yet, these indicators have never been based on a substantial body of evidence or data from the varied living standards found in cities or specifically informal settlements. This study aims to contextualize the Sphere standards for urban populations by comparing a sample of the revised key indicators to living standards in three urban informal settlements of Nairobi, Kenya, during a non-crisis period to examine their relevance and applicability, and discuss the implications. Methods Retrospective analysis of data sourced from randomized household surveys of three informal settlements in Nairobi across a range of living standards including a convenience sample of Sphere metrics is quantitatively compared to the newly revised Sphere standards. Results The results show that while some standards are met, many of the urban poor in these settlements live far below the prescribed minimum standards across many key sectors including water, sanitation, shelter, and food security. The data also reveal variations between and within individual informal settlements. Conclusion The Sphere standards are not informed enough by informality and remain largely aspirational for some populations and consensus rather than evidence-based. The revised handbook has made significant strides in highlighting the need for contextualization, market approaches, and incorporating stakeholder input. The new Sphere standards must be placed into context for use in the new urban agenda realigning humanitarian actions towards more locally contextualized and driven practice. |
topic |
Urban slum Informal settlement Sphere standards Urban crises Minimum standards Localizing aid |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41018-019-0054-y |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ronakbpatel revisitingthespherestandardscomparingtherevisedspherestandardstolivingstandardsinthreeurbaninformalsettlementsinnairobikenya AT jaychadhuri revisitingthespherestandardscomparingtherevisedspherestandardstolivingstandardsinthreeurbaninformalsettlementsinnairobikenya |
_version_ |
1724713445501173760 |