The relationship between behavioral language laterality, face laterality and language performance in left-handers.

Left-handers provide unique information about the relationship between cognitive functions because of their larger variability in hemispheric dominance. This study presents the laterality distribution of, correlations between and test-retest reliability of behavioral lateralized language tasks (spee...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lise Van der Haegen, Marc Brysbaert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208696
id doaj-e803adb94e424bd1a3cc5657393302e2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e803adb94e424bd1a3cc5657393302e22021-03-03T21:00:58ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-011312e020869610.1371/journal.pone.0208696The relationship between behavioral language laterality, face laterality and language performance in left-handers.Lise Van der HaegenMarc BrysbaertLeft-handers provide unique information about the relationship between cognitive functions because of their larger variability in hemispheric dominance. This study presents the laterality distribution of, correlations between and test-retest reliability of behavioral lateralized language tasks (speech production, reading and speech perception), face recognition tasks, handedness measures and language performance tests based on data from 98 left-handers. The results show that a behavioral test battery leads to percentages of (a)typical dominance that are similar to those found in neuropsychological studies even though the incidence of clear atypical lateralization (about 20%) may be overestimated at the group level. Significant correlations were found between the language tasks for both reaction time and accuracy lateralization indices. The degree of language laterality could however not be linked to face laterality, handedness or language performance. Finally, individuals were classified less consistently than expected as being typical, bilateral or atypical across all tasks. This may be due to the often good (speech production and perception tasks) but sometimes weak (reading and face tasks) test-retest reliabilities. The lack of highly reliable and valid test protocols for functions unrelated to speech remains one of the largest impediments for individual analysis and cross-task investigations in laterality research.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208696
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lise Van der Haegen
Marc Brysbaert
spellingShingle Lise Van der Haegen
Marc Brysbaert
The relationship between behavioral language laterality, face laterality and language performance in left-handers.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Lise Van der Haegen
Marc Brysbaert
author_sort Lise Van der Haegen
title The relationship between behavioral language laterality, face laterality and language performance in left-handers.
title_short The relationship between behavioral language laterality, face laterality and language performance in left-handers.
title_full The relationship between behavioral language laterality, face laterality and language performance in left-handers.
title_fullStr The relationship between behavioral language laterality, face laterality and language performance in left-handers.
title_full_unstemmed The relationship between behavioral language laterality, face laterality and language performance in left-handers.
title_sort relationship between behavioral language laterality, face laterality and language performance in left-handers.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Left-handers provide unique information about the relationship between cognitive functions because of their larger variability in hemispheric dominance. This study presents the laterality distribution of, correlations between and test-retest reliability of behavioral lateralized language tasks (speech production, reading and speech perception), face recognition tasks, handedness measures and language performance tests based on data from 98 left-handers. The results show that a behavioral test battery leads to percentages of (a)typical dominance that are similar to those found in neuropsychological studies even though the incidence of clear atypical lateralization (about 20%) may be overestimated at the group level. Significant correlations were found between the language tasks for both reaction time and accuracy lateralization indices. The degree of language laterality could however not be linked to face laterality, handedness or language performance. Finally, individuals were classified less consistently than expected as being typical, bilateral or atypical across all tasks. This may be due to the often good (speech production and perception tasks) but sometimes weak (reading and face tasks) test-retest reliabilities. The lack of highly reliable and valid test protocols for functions unrelated to speech remains one of the largest impediments for individual analysis and cross-task investigations in laterality research.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208696
work_keys_str_mv AT lisevanderhaegen therelationshipbetweenbehaviorallanguagelateralityfacelateralityandlanguageperformanceinlefthanders
AT marcbrysbaert therelationshipbetweenbehaviorallanguagelateralityfacelateralityandlanguageperformanceinlefthanders
AT lisevanderhaegen relationshipbetweenbehaviorallanguagelateralityfacelateralityandlanguageperformanceinlefthanders
AT marcbrysbaert relationshipbetweenbehaviorallanguagelateralityfacelateralityandlanguageperformanceinlefthanders
_version_ 1714819334792019968