Ash and ice clouds during the Mt Kelud February 2014 eruption as interpreted from IASI and AVHRR/3 observations

During the Mt Kelud February 2014 eruption the ash cloud was detectable on 13–14 February in the infrared with the reverse absorption technique by, for example, the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR/3). The Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) observed the ash cloud also...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: A. Kylling
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2016-05-01
Series:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Online Access:http://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/9/2103/2016/amt-9-2103-2016.pdf
id doaj-e7f34ffbd9d9454ca76f0563d69812b1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e7f34ffbd9d9454ca76f0563d69812b12020-11-24T23:46:57ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Measurement Techniques1867-13811867-85482016-05-01952103211710.5194/amt-9-2103-2016Ash and ice clouds during the Mt Kelud February 2014 eruption as interpreted from IASI and AVHRR/3 observationsA. Kylling0NILU – Norwegian Institute for Air Research, P.O. Box 100, 2027 Kjeller, NorwayDuring the Mt Kelud February 2014 eruption the ash cloud was detectable on 13–14 February in the infrared with the reverse absorption technique by, for example, the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR/3). The Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) observed the ash cloud also on 15 February when AVHRR did not detect any ash signal. The differences between ash detection with AVHRR/3 and IASI are discussed along with the reasons for the differences, supported by radiative transfer modelling. The effect of concurrent ice clouds on the ash detection and the ash signal in the IASI measurements is demonstrated. Specifically, a radiative transfer model is used to simulate IASI spectra with ash-only, with ice cloud only and with both ash and ice clouds. It is shown that modelled IASI spectra with ash and ice clouds reproduce the measured IASI spectra better than ash-only- or ice-only-modelled spectra. The ash and ice modelled spectra that best reproduce the IASI spectra contain about a factor of 12 less ash than the ash-only spectra that come closest to reproducing the measured spectra.http://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/9/2103/2016/amt-9-2103-2016.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. Kylling
spellingShingle A. Kylling
Ash and ice clouds during the Mt Kelud February 2014 eruption as interpreted from IASI and AVHRR/3 observations
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
author_facet A. Kylling
author_sort A. Kylling
title Ash and ice clouds during the Mt Kelud February 2014 eruption as interpreted from IASI and AVHRR/3 observations
title_short Ash and ice clouds during the Mt Kelud February 2014 eruption as interpreted from IASI and AVHRR/3 observations
title_full Ash and ice clouds during the Mt Kelud February 2014 eruption as interpreted from IASI and AVHRR/3 observations
title_fullStr Ash and ice clouds during the Mt Kelud February 2014 eruption as interpreted from IASI and AVHRR/3 observations
title_full_unstemmed Ash and ice clouds during the Mt Kelud February 2014 eruption as interpreted from IASI and AVHRR/3 observations
title_sort ash and ice clouds during the mt kelud february 2014 eruption as interpreted from iasi and avhrr/3 observations
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
issn 1867-1381
1867-8548
publishDate 2016-05-01
description During the Mt Kelud February 2014 eruption the ash cloud was detectable on 13–14 February in the infrared with the reverse absorption technique by, for example, the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR/3). The Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) observed the ash cloud also on 15 February when AVHRR did not detect any ash signal. The differences between ash detection with AVHRR/3 and IASI are discussed along with the reasons for the differences, supported by radiative transfer modelling. The effect of concurrent ice clouds on the ash detection and the ash signal in the IASI measurements is demonstrated. Specifically, a radiative transfer model is used to simulate IASI spectra with ash-only, with ice cloud only and with both ash and ice clouds. It is shown that modelled IASI spectra with ash and ice clouds reproduce the measured IASI spectra better than ash-only- or ice-only-modelled spectra. The ash and ice modelled spectra that best reproduce the IASI spectra contain about a factor of 12 less ash than the ash-only spectra that come closest to reproducing the measured spectra.
url http://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/9/2103/2016/amt-9-2103-2016.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT akylling ashandicecloudsduringthemtkeludfebruary2014eruptionasinterpretedfromiasiandavhrr3observations
_version_ 1725491517848551424