Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews
Abstract Background Overviews of systematic reviews are an increasingly popular method of evidence synthesis; there is a lack of clear guidance for completing overviews and a number of methodological challenges. At the UK Cochrane Symposium 2016, methodological challenges of five overviews were expl...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-07-01
|
Series: | Systematic Reviews |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-017-0534-3 |
id |
doaj-e7e08b387f9d4ecabd4dc460161b36f3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e7e08b387f9d4ecabd4dc460161b36f32020-11-24T20:55:59ZengBMCSystematic Reviews2046-40532017-07-016111810.1186/s13643-017-0534-3Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviewsAlex Pollock0Pauline Campbell1Ginny Brunton2Harriet Hunt3Lise Estcourt4Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions (NMAHP) Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian UniversityNursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions (NMAHP) Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian UniversityUCL Institute of Education, University College LondonUniversity of Exeter Medical SchoolNHS Blood and Transplant Oxford and Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of OxfordAbstract Background Overviews of systematic reviews are an increasingly popular method of evidence synthesis; there is a lack of clear guidance for completing overviews and a number of methodological challenges. At the UK Cochrane Symposium 2016, methodological challenges of five overviews were explored. Using data from these five overviews, practical implications to support methodological decision making of authors writing protocols for future overviews are proposed. Methods Methods, and their justification, from the five exemplar overviews were tabulated and compared with areas of debate identified within current literature. Key methodological challenges and implications for development of overview protocols were generated and synthesised into a list, discussed and refined until there was consensus. Results Methodological features of three Cochrane overviews, one overview of diagnostic test accuracy and one mixed methods overview have been summarised. Methods of selection of reviews and data extraction were similar. Either the AMSTAR or ROBIS tool was used to assess quality of included reviews. The GRADE approach was most commonly used to assess quality of evidence within the reviews. Eight key methodological challenges were identified from the exemplar overviews. There was good agreement between our findings and emerging areas of debate within a recent published synthesis. Implications for development of protocols for future overviews were identified. Conclusions Overviews are a relatively new methodological innovation, and there are currently substantial variations in the methodological approaches used within different overviews. There are considerable methodological challenges for which optimal solutions are not necessarily yet known. Lessons learnt from five exemplar overviews highlight a number of methodological decisions which may be beneficial to consider during the development of an overview protocol.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-017-0534-3ChallengesMethodsOverviewsQuality assessmentSynthesis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Alex Pollock Pauline Campbell Ginny Brunton Harriet Hunt Lise Estcourt |
spellingShingle |
Alex Pollock Pauline Campbell Ginny Brunton Harriet Hunt Lise Estcourt Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews Systematic Reviews Challenges Methods Overviews Quality assessment Synthesis |
author_facet |
Alex Pollock Pauline Campbell Ginny Brunton Harriet Hunt Lise Estcourt |
author_sort |
Alex Pollock |
title |
Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews |
title_short |
Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews |
title_full |
Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews |
title_fullStr |
Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews |
title_full_unstemmed |
Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews |
title_sort |
selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Systematic Reviews |
issn |
2046-4053 |
publishDate |
2017-07-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Overviews of systematic reviews are an increasingly popular method of evidence synthesis; there is a lack of clear guidance for completing overviews and a number of methodological challenges. At the UK Cochrane Symposium 2016, methodological challenges of five overviews were explored. Using data from these five overviews, practical implications to support methodological decision making of authors writing protocols for future overviews are proposed. Methods Methods, and their justification, from the five exemplar overviews were tabulated and compared with areas of debate identified within current literature. Key methodological challenges and implications for development of overview protocols were generated and synthesised into a list, discussed and refined until there was consensus. Results Methodological features of three Cochrane overviews, one overview of diagnostic test accuracy and one mixed methods overview have been summarised. Methods of selection of reviews and data extraction were similar. Either the AMSTAR or ROBIS tool was used to assess quality of included reviews. The GRADE approach was most commonly used to assess quality of evidence within the reviews. Eight key methodological challenges were identified from the exemplar overviews. There was good agreement between our findings and emerging areas of debate within a recent published synthesis. Implications for development of protocols for future overviews were identified. Conclusions Overviews are a relatively new methodological innovation, and there are currently substantial variations in the methodological approaches used within different overviews. There are considerable methodological challenges for which optimal solutions are not necessarily yet known. Lessons learnt from five exemplar overviews highlight a number of methodological decisions which may be beneficial to consider during the development of an overview protocol. |
topic |
Challenges Methods Overviews Quality assessment Synthesis |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-017-0534-3 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alexpollock selectingandimplementingoverviewmethodsimplicationsfromfiveexemplaroverviews AT paulinecampbell selectingandimplementingoverviewmethodsimplicationsfromfiveexemplaroverviews AT ginnybrunton selectingandimplementingoverviewmethodsimplicationsfromfiveexemplaroverviews AT harriethunt selectingandimplementingoverviewmethodsimplicationsfromfiveexemplaroverviews AT liseestcourt selectingandimplementingoverviewmethodsimplicationsfromfiveexemplaroverviews |
_version_ |
1716791179018764288 |