A Comparison between Pump & Treat Technique and Permeable Reactive Barriers for the Remediation of Groundwater Contaminated by Chlorinated Organic Compounds

This paper deals with the design and the preliminary optimization of the remediation of a Tetrachloroethylene (PCE)-contaminated aquifer by Pump and Treat technique (P&T) or Permeable Reactive Barrier (PRB). The experimental site is located near a solid waste landfill in the metropolitan area No...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: I. Bortone, S. Chianese, A. Di Nardo, M. Di Natale, A. Erto, D. Musmarra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. 2013-06-01
Series:Chemical Engineering Transactions
Online Access:https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/6400
id doaj-e7db3e4761b54f579c21b518a139b088
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e7db3e4761b54f579c21b518a139b0882021-02-22T21:00:28ZengAIDIC Servizi S.r.l.Chemical Engineering Transactions2283-92162013-06-013210.3303/CET1332006A Comparison between Pump & Treat Technique and Permeable Reactive Barriers for the Remediation of Groundwater Contaminated by Chlorinated Organic CompoundsI. BortoneS. ChianeseA. Di NardoM. Di NataleA. ErtoD. MusmarraThis paper deals with the design and the preliminary optimization of the remediation of a Tetrachloroethylene (PCE)-contaminated aquifer by Pump and Treat technique (P&T) or Permeable Reactive Barrier (PRB). The experimental site is located near a solid waste landfill in the metropolitan area North of Naples (Italy) where a considerable amount of solid waste has been deposited over the past decades. For both remediation technologies, adsorption onto granular activated carbon was adopted to remove PCE from water. In particular, a comparison of the results obtained, both in terms of efficacy of pollutant removal and the corresponding preliminary overall cost, was conducted. The design of both remediation techniques was conducted by using a commercial 3D hydrodynamic code to simulate groundwater flow and contamination transport and a second code, developed by the authors, to describe the adsorption phenomena involving the pollutant.https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/6400
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author I. Bortone
S. Chianese
A. Di Nardo
M. Di Natale
A. Erto
D. Musmarra
spellingShingle I. Bortone
S. Chianese
A. Di Nardo
M. Di Natale
A. Erto
D. Musmarra
A Comparison between Pump & Treat Technique and Permeable Reactive Barriers for the Remediation of Groundwater Contaminated by Chlorinated Organic Compounds
Chemical Engineering Transactions
author_facet I. Bortone
S. Chianese
A. Di Nardo
M. Di Natale
A. Erto
D. Musmarra
author_sort I. Bortone
title A Comparison between Pump & Treat Technique and Permeable Reactive Barriers for the Remediation of Groundwater Contaminated by Chlorinated Organic Compounds
title_short A Comparison between Pump & Treat Technique and Permeable Reactive Barriers for the Remediation of Groundwater Contaminated by Chlorinated Organic Compounds
title_full A Comparison between Pump & Treat Technique and Permeable Reactive Barriers for the Remediation of Groundwater Contaminated by Chlorinated Organic Compounds
title_fullStr A Comparison between Pump & Treat Technique and Permeable Reactive Barriers for the Remediation of Groundwater Contaminated by Chlorinated Organic Compounds
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison between Pump & Treat Technique and Permeable Reactive Barriers for the Remediation of Groundwater Contaminated by Chlorinated Organic Compounds
title_sort comparison between pump & treat technique and permeable reactive barriers for the remediation of groundwater contaminated by chlorinated organic compounds
publisher AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.
series Chemical Engineering Transactions
issn 2283-9216
publishDate 2013-06-01
description This paper deals with the design and the preliminary optimization of the remediation of a Tetrachloroethylene (PCE)-contaminated aquifer by Pump and Treat technique (P&T) or Permeable Reactive Barrier (PRB). The experimental site is located near a solid waste landfill in the metropolitan area North of Naples (Italy) where a considerable amount of solid waste has been deposited over the past decades. For both remediation technologies, adsorption onto granular activated carbon was adopted to remove PCE from water. In particular, a comparison of the results obtained, both in terms of efficacy of pollutant removal and the corresponding preliminary overall cost, was conducted. The design of both remediation techniques was conducted by using a commercial 3D hydrodynamic code to simulate groundwater flow and contamination transport and a second code, developed by the authors, to describe the adsorption phenomena involving the pollutant.
url https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/6400
work_keys_str_mv AT ibortone acomparisonbetweenpumptreattechniqueandpermeablereactivebarriersfortheremediationofgroundwatercontaminatedbychlorinatedorganiccompounds
AT schianese acomparisonbetweenpumptreattechniqueandpermeablereactivebarriersfortheremediationofgroundwatercontaminatedbychlorinatedorganiccompounds
AT adinardo acomparisonbetweenpumptreattechniqueandpermeablereactivebarriersfortheremediationofgroundwatercontaminatedbychlorinatedorganiccompounds
AT mdinatale acomparisonbetweenpumptreattechniqueandpermeablereactivebarriersfortheremediationofgroundwatercontaminatedbychlorinatedorganiccompounds
AT aerto acomparisonbetweenpumptreattechniqueandpermeablereactivebarriersfortheremediationofgroundwatercontaminatedbychlorinatedorganiccompounds
AT dmusmarra acomparisonbetweenpumptreattechniqueandpermeablereactivebarriersfortheremediationofgroundwatercontaminatedbychlorinatedorganiccompounds
AT ibortone comparisonbetweenpumptreattechniqueandpermeablereactivebarriersfortheremediationofgroundwatercontaminatedbychlorinatedorganiccompounds
AT schianese comparisonbetweenpumptreattechniqueandpermeablereactivebarriersfortheremediationofgroundwatercontaminatedbychlorinatedorganiccompounds
AT adinardo comparisonbetweenpumptreattechniqueandpermeablereactivebarriersfortheremediationofgroundwatercontaminatedbychlorinatedorganiccompounds
AT mdinatale comparisonbetweenpumptreattechniqueandpermeablereactivebarriersfortheremediationofgroundwatercontaminatedbychlorinatedorganiccompounds
AT aerto comparisonbetweenpumptreattechniqueandpermeablereactivebarriersfortheremediationofgroundwatercontaminatedbychlorinatedorganiccompounds
AT dmusmarra comparisonbetweenpumptreattechniqueandpermeablereactivebarriersfortheremediationofgroundwatercontaminatedbychlorinatedorganiccompounds
_version_ 1724256444461613056