Vertical jump of the male Bolleyball player during the years of 1970 to 2016 - indoor and sand double: a systematic review and meta-analysis
The objective of the systematic review and of the meta-analysis was to determine the improvement of the vertical jump during the years or not and compare the vertical jump of the volleyball players versus the double players practiced in the sand. This study followed the methodology proposed the PRIS...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Portuguese |
Published: |
Instituto Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Ensino em Fisiologia do Exercício
2020-05-01
|
Series: | Revista Brasileira de Prescrição e Fisiologia do Exercício |
Online Access: | http://www.rbpfex.com.br/index.php/rbpfex/article/view/1749 |
id |
doaj-e7bf88006578494788a1812deee60bb2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e7bf88006578494788a1812deee60bb22020-11-25T04:08:33ZporInstituto Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Ensino em Fisiologia do ExercícioRevista Brasileira de Prescrição e Fisiologia do Exercício1981-99002020-05-011387114111701749Vertical jump of the male Bolleyball player during the years of 1970 to 2016 - indoor and sand double: a systematic review and meta-analysisNelson Kautzner Marques JuniorThe objective of the systematic review and of the meta-analysis was to determine the improvement of the vertical jump during the years or not and compare the vertical jump of the volleyball players versus the double players practiced in the sand. This study followed the methodology proposed the PRISMA statement. The studies were identified in electronic databases during January of 2017 to February of 2017. The author used the FIOCRUZ library to collect some scientific articles. Of these studies, 51 studies were included in this research. The best CMJ of the systematic review was of the double volleyball with 89 ± 7.25 cm. But the best CMJS (81.7 ± 8.83 cm), the best SPJ (97.63 ± 7.32 cm) and the best BJ (78.6 ± 6.30 cm) were of the years 70 to 90 of the indoor volleyball. The Shapiro Wilk test detected no normal data of the effect size. Kruskal Wallis Anova and new statistical detected statistical difference of the CMJ of the years 70 to 90 (effect size of 6.07 ± 6.68) versus the CMJ of the years 10 to 16 (ES of 0.86 ± 1.14) and of the years 00 to 16 (ES of 1 ± 1.13). In conclusion, the years 70 to 90 the CMJS, the SPJ and the BJ of the volleyball players had a higher jump than other years, but these results are not conclusive because of the limitations of the study.http://www.rbpfex.com.br/index.php/rbpfex/article/view/1749 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Portuguese |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nelson Kautzner Marques Junior |
spellingShingle |
Nelson Kautzner Marques Junior Vertical jump of the male Bolleyball player during the years of 1970 to 2016 - indoor and sand double: a systematic review and meta-analysis Revista Brasileira de Prescrição e Fisiologia do Exercício |
author_facet |
Nelson Kautzner Marques Junior |
author_sort |
Nelson Kautzner Marques Junior |
title |
Vertical jump of the male Bolleyball player during the years of 1970 to 2016 - indoor and sand double: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short |
Vertical jump of the male Bolleyball player during the years of 1970 to 2016 - indoor and sand double: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
Vertical jump of the male Bolleyball player during the years of 1970 to 2016 - indoor and sand double: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Vertical jump of the male Bolleyball player during the years of 1970 to 2016 - indoor and sand double: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Vertical jump of the male Bolleyball player during the years of 1970 to 2016 - indoor and sand double: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
vertical jump of the male bolleyball player during the years of 1970 to 2016 - indoor and sand double: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
publisher |
Instituto Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Ensino em Fisiologia do Exercício |
series |
Revista Brasileira de Prescrição e Fisiologia do Exercício |
issn |
1981-9900 |
publishDate |
2020-05-01 |
description |
The objective of the systematic review and of the meta-analysis was to determine the improvement of the vertical jump during the years or not and compare the vertical jump of the volleyball players versus the double players practiced in the sand. This study followed the methodology proposed the PRISMA statement. The studies were identified in electronic databases during January of 2017 to February of 2017. The author used the FIOCRUZ library to collect some scientific articles. Of these studies, 51 studies were included in this research. The best CMJ of the systematic review was of the double volleyball with 89 ± 7.25 cm. But the best CMJS (81.7 ± 8.83 cm), the best SPJ (97.63 ± 7.32 cm) and the best BJ (78.6 ± 6.30 cm) were of the years 70 to 90 of the indoor volleyball. The Shapiro Wilk test detected no normal data of the effect size. Kruskal Wallis Anova and new statistical detected statistical difference of the CMJ of the years 70 to 90 (effect size of 6.07 ± 6.68) versus the CMJ of the years 10 to 16 (ES of 0.86 ± 1.14) and of the years 00 to 16 (ES of 1 ± 1.13). In conclusion, the years 70 to 90 the CMJS, the SPJ and the BJ of the volleyball players had a higher jump than other years, but these results are not conclusive because of the limitations of the study. |
url |
http://www.rbpfex.com.br/index.php/rbpfex/article/view/1749 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nelsonkautznermarquesjunior verticaljumpofthemalebolleyballplayerduringtheyearsof1970to2016indoorandsanddoubleasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |
_version_ |
1724425132036849664 |