Vertical jump of the male Bolleyball player during the years of 1970 to 2016 - indoor and sand double: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The objective of the systematic review and of the meta-analysis was to determine the improvement of the vertical jump during the years or not and compare the vertical jump of the volleyball players versus the double players practiced in the sand. This study followed the methodology proposed the PRIS...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nelson Kautzner Marques Junior
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Instituto Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Ensino em Fisiologia do Exercício 2020-05-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Prescrição e Fisiologia do Exercício
Online Access:http://www.rbpfex.com.br/index.php/rbpfex/article/view/1749
id doaj-e7bf88006578494788a1812deee60bb2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e7bf88006578494788a1812deee60bb22020-11-25T04:08:33ZporInstituto Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Ensino em Fisiologia do ExercícioRevista Brasileira de Prescrição e Fisiologia do Exercício1981-99002020-05-011387114111701749Vertical jump of the male Bolleyball player during the years of 1970 to 2016 - indoor and sand double: a systematic review and meta-analysisNelson Kautzner Marques JuniorThe objective of the systematic review and of the meta-analysis was to determine the improvement of the vertical jump during the years or not and compare the vertical jump of the volleyball players versus the double players practiced in the sand. This study followed the methodology proposed the PRISMA statement. The studies were identified in electronic databases during January of 2017 to February of 2017. The author used the FIOCRUZ library to collect some scientific articles. Of these studies, 51 studies were included in this research. The best CMJ of the systematic review was of the double volleyball with 89 ± 7.25 cm. But the best CMJS (81.7 ± 8.83 cm), the best SPJ (97.63 ± 7.32 cm) and the best BJ (78.6 ± 6.30 cm) were of the years 70 to 90 of the indoor volleyball. The Shapiro Wilk test detected no normal data of the effect size. Kruskal Wallis Anova and new statistical detected statistical difference of the CMJ of the years 70 to 90 (effect size of 6.07 ± 6.68) versus the CMJ of the years 10 to 16 (ES of 0.86 ± 1.14) and of the years 00 to 16 (ES of 1 ± 1.13). In conclusion, the years 70 to 90 the CMJS, the SPJ and the BJ of the volleyball players had a higher jump than other years, but these results are not conclusive because of the limitations of the study.http://www.rbpfex.com.br/index.php/rbpfex/article/view/1749
collection DOAJ
language Portuguese
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nelson Kautzner Marques Junior
spellingShingle Nelson Kautzner Marques Junior
Vertical jump of the male Bolleyball player during the years of 1970 to 2016 - indoor and sand double: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Revista Brasileira de Prescrição e Fisiologia do Exercício
author_facet Nelson Kautzner Marques Junior
author_sort Nelson Kautzner Marques Junior
title Vertical jump of the male Bolleyball player during the years of 1970 to 2016 - indoor and sand double: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Vertical jump of the male Bolleyball player during the years of 1970 to 2016 - indoor and sand double: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Vertical jump of the male Bolleyball player during the years of 1970 to 2016 - indoor and sand double: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Vertical jump of the male Bolleyball player during the years of 1970 to 2016 - indoor and sand double: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Vertical jump of the male Bolleyball player during the years of 1970 to 2016 - indoor and sand double: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort vertical jump of the male bolleyball player during the years of 1970 to 2016 - indoor and sand double: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher Instituto Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Ensino em Fisiologia do Exercício
series Revista Brasileira de Prescrição e Fisiologia do Exercício
issn 1981-9900
publishDate 2020-05-01
description The objective of the systematic review and of the meta-analysis was to determine the improvement of the vertical jump during the years or not and compare the vertical jump of the volleyball players versus the double players practiced in the sand. This study followed the methodology proposed the PRISMA statement. The studies were identified in electronic databases during January of 2017 to February of 2017. The author used the FIOCRUZ library to collect some scientific articles. Of these studies, 51 studies were included in this research. The best CMJ of the systematic review was of the double volleyball with 89 ± 7.25 cm. But the best CMJS (81.7 ± 8.83 cm), the best SPJ (97.63 ± 7.32 cm) and the best BJ (78.6 ± 6.30 cm) were of the years 70 to 90 of the indoor volleyball. The Shapiro Wilk test detected no normal data of the effect size. Kruskal Wallis Anova and new statistical detected statistical difference of the CMJ of the years 70 to 90 (effect size of 6.07 ± 6.68) versus the CMJ of the years 10 to 16 (ES of 0.86 ± 1.14) and of the years 00 to 16 (ES of 1 ± 1.13). In conclusion, the years 70 to 90 the CMJS, the SPJ and the BJ of the volleyball players had a higher jump than other years, but these results are not conclusive because of the limitations of the study.
url http://www.rbpfex.com.br/index.php/rbpfex/article/view/1749
work_keys_str_mv AT nelsonkautznermarquesjunior verticaljumpofthemalebolleyballplayerduringtheyearsof1970to2016indoorandsanddoubleasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1724425132036849664