Crítica literária e sociedade: como representa o texto literário?

This article discusses, from a theoretical point of view, the paradoxical relationship between literature and society. On the one hand, it criticizes a reading of literature with a sociologizing bias disseminated by the culturalist critique, but tries to retrieve positive aspects mentioned by aut...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Juan Pablo Chiappara
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) 2006-01-01
Series:Ciências Sociais Unisinos
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=93842305
id doaj-e7b7642f3fae46a58da5b93b32d174e8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e7b7642f3fae46a58da5b93b32d174e82021-10-08T16:04:17ZporUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)Ciências Sociais Unisinos2177-62292006-01-01423189198Crítica literária e sociedade: como representa o texto literário?Juan Pablo ChiapparaThis article discusses, from a theoretical point of view, the paradoxical relationship between literature and society. On the one hand, it criticizes a reading of literature with a sociologizing bias disseminated by the culturalist critique, but tries to retrieve positive aspects mentioned by authors such as Mignolo, Moreiras, Polar and Bhabba. On the other hand, it proposes a reading of literarature that asks about what it means to represent when one is in the literary realm. Thus, it poses the idea of thinking on the basis of the concept of paratopia, suggested by Maingueneau in the early 90s in the French Analysis of Discourse. In Cultural Studies, some concepts by Homi Bhabba are reconsidered, as they offer a theoretical point of view aligned with an idea of representation that does not take for granted a smooth or simplified passage from the literary text to the social or from the social to the text. Nowadays the relationship between society and literary discourse remains open. The 20th century has tried various theoretical solutions: literary structuralism believed in immanence, a post-structuralism crossed immanence and culture. Later on a certain literary critique seems to emphasize the documental aspect of literary works, giving up their aesthetical character and the differentiated conditions of social functioning that it creates. So, this article ends up being an invitation to reflect on and dialogue with thinkers from other areas of social studies who intend to deal with literary texts in their history, politics, sociology and culture works and who, with their theoretical background and practices, will be able to produce new reflections on the issue raised.http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=93842305literaturerepresentationsociety
collection DOAJ
language Portuguese
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Juan Pablo Chiappara
spellingShingle Juan Pablo Chiappara
Crítica literária e sociedade: como representa o texto literário?
Ciências Sociais Unisinos
literature
representation
society
author_facet Juan Pablo Chiappara
author_sort Juan Pablo Chiappara
title Crítica literária e sociedade: como representa o texto literário?
title_short Crítica literária e sociedade: como representa o texto literário?
title_full Crítica literária e sociedade: como representa o texto literário?
title_fullStr Crítica literária e sociedade: como representa o texto literário?
title_full_unstemmed Crítica literária e sociedade: como representa o texto literário?
title_sort crítica literária e sociedade: como representa o texto literário?
publisher Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)
series Ciências Sociais Unisinos
issn 2177-6229
publishDate 2006-01-01
description This article discusses, from a theoretical point of view, the paradoxical relationship between literature and society. On the one hand, it criticizes a reading of literature with a sociologizing bias disseminated by the culturalist critique, but tries to retrieve positive aspects mentioned by authors such as Mignolo, Moreiras, Polar and Bhabba. On the other hand, it proposes a reading of literarature that asks about what it means to represent when one is in the literary realm. Thus, it poses the idea of thinking on the basis of the concept of paratopia, suggested by Maingueneau in the early 90s in the French Analysis of Discourse. In Cultural Studies, some concepts by Homi Bhabba are reconsidered, as they offer a theoretical point of view aligned with an idea of representation that does not take for granted a smooth or simplified passage from the literary text to the social or from the social to the text. Nowadays the relationship between society and literary discourse remains open. The 20th century has tried various theoretical solutions: literary structuralism believed in immanence, a post-structuralism crossed immanence and culture. Later on a certain literary critique seems to emphasize the documental aspect of literary works, giving up their aesthetical character and the differentiated conditions of social functioning that it creates. So, this article ends up being an invitation to reflect on and dialogue with thinkers from other areas of social studies who intend to deal with literary texts in their history, politics, sociology and culture works and who, with their theoretical background and practices, will be able to produce new reflections on the issue raised.
topic literature
representation
society
url http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=93842305
work_keys_str_mv AT juanpablochiappara criticaliterariaesociedadecomorepresentaotextoliterario
_version_ 1716833142046720000