An Evolutionary Perspective on Toxic Leadership

Charles Darwin’s prediction from 1859, that future psychology was going to be built on principles derived from evolutionary theory came at last to be fulfilled. Nowadays, there are at least four disciplines that attempt to explain human behaviours as evolutionary adaptations (or maladaptations) to t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lucia Ovidia VREJA, Sergiu BALAN, Loredana Cornelia BOSCA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Editura ASE 2016-12-01
Series:Management and Economics Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://mer.ase.ro/files/2016-2/13.pdf
id doaj-e7b4a29144e54cdcbab07937f5df4103
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e7b4a29144e54cdcbab07937f5df41032020-11-24T23:45:11ZengEditura ASEManagement and Economics Review2501-885X2501-885X2016-12-0112217228An Evolutionary Perspective on Toxic LeadershipLucia Ovidia VREJA0Sergiu BALAN1Loredana Cornelia BOSCA2Bucharest University of Economic Studies, RomaniaBucharest University of Economic Studies, RomaniaBucharest University of Economic Studies, RomaniaCharles Darwin’s prediction from 1859, that future psychology was going to be built on principles derived from evolutionary theory came at last to be fulfilled. Nowadays, there are at least four disciplines that attempt to explain human behaviours as evolutionary adaptations (or maladaptations) to the natural and/or social environment: human sociobiology, human behavioural ecology, evolutionary psychology, memetics and gene–culture coevolution theory (in our view, the most adequate of all). According to gene–culture coevolution theory, articulated language was the singular phenomenon that permitted humans to become a cultural species, and from that moment on culture become itself a selection factor. Culture means transmission of information from one generation to the next and learning from other individuals’ experiences, trough language. So, it is of critical importance to have good criteria for the selection of those individuals from whom we should learn. Yet when humans also choose their leaders from among those role-models, according to the same criteria, this mechanism can become a maladaptation and the result can be toxic leadership.http://mer.ase.ro/files/2016-2/13.pdfhuman sociobiologyhuman behavioural ecologyevolutionary psychologymemeticsgene–culture coevolution theorydominance statusprestige statustoxic leadership
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lucia Ovidia VREJA
Sergiu BALAN
Loredana Cornelia BOSCA
spellingShingle Lucia Ovidia VREJA
Sergiu BALAN
Loredana Cornelia BOSCA
An Evolutionary Perspective on Toxic Leadership
Management and Economics Review
human sociobiology
human behavioural ecology
evolutionary psychology
memetics
gene–culture coevolution theory
dominance status
prestige status
toxic leadership
author_facet Lucia Ovidia VREJA
Sergiu BALAN
Loredana Cornelia BOSCA
author_sort Lucia Ovidia VREJA
title An Evolutionary Perspective on Toxic Leadership
title_short An Evolutionary Perspective on Toxic Leadership
title_full An Evolutionary Perspective on Toxic Leadership
title_fullStr An Evolutionary Perspective on Toxic Leadership
title_full_unstemmed An Evolutionary Perspective on Toxic Leadership
title_sort evolutionary perspective on toxic leadership
publisher Editura ASE
series Management and Economics Review
issn 2501-885X
2501-885X
publishDate 2016-12-01
description Charles Darwin’s prediction from 1859, that future psychology was going to be built on principles derived from evolutionary theory came at last to be fulfilled. Nowadays, there are at least four disciplines that attempt to explain human behaviours as evolutionary adaptations (or maladaptations) to the natural and/or social environment: human sociobiology, human behavioural ecology, evolutionary psychology, memetics and gene–culture coevolution theory (in our view, the most adequate of all). According to gene–culture coevolution theory, articulated language was the singular phenomenon that permitted humans to become a cultural species, and from that moment on culture become itself a selection factor. Culture means transmission of information from one generation to the next and learning from other individuals’ experiences, trough language. So, it is of critical importance to have good criteria for the selection of those individuals from whom we should learn. Yet when humans also choose their leaders from among those role-models, according to the same criteria, this mechanism can become a maladaptation and the result can be toxic leadership.
topic human sociobiology
human behavioural ecology
evolutionary psychology
memetics
gene–culture coevolution theory
dominance status
prestige status
toxic leadership
url http://mer.ase.ro/files/2016-2/13.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT luciaovidiavreja anevolutionaryperspectiveontoxicleadership
AT sergiubalan anevolutionaryperspectiveontoxicleadership
AT loredanacorneliabosca anevolutionaryperspectiveontoxicleadership
AT luciaovidiavreja evolutionaryperspectiveontoxicleadership
AT sergiubalan evolutionaryperspectiveontoxicleadership
AT loredanacorneliabosca evolutionaryperspectiveontoxicleadership
_version_ 1725496966325993472