An Evolutionary Perspective on Toxic Leadership
Charles Darwin’s prediction from 1859, that future psychology was going to be built on principles derived from evolutionary theory came at last to be fulfilled. Nowadays, there are at least four disciplines that attempt to explain human behaviours as evolutionary adaptations (or maladaptations) to t...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Editura ASE
2016-12-01
|
Series: | Management and Economics Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://mer.ase.ro/files/2016-2/13.pdf |
id |
doaj-e7b4a29144e54cdcbab07937f5df4103 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e7b4a29144e54cdcbab07937f5df41032020-11-24T23:45:11ZengEditura ASEManagement and Economics Review2501-885X2501-885X2016-12-0112217228An Evolutionary Perspective on Toxic LeadershipLucia Ovidia VREJA0Sergiu BALAN1Loredana Cornelia BOSCA2Bucharest University of Economic Studies, RomaniaBucharest University of Economic Studies, RomaniaBucharest University of Economic Studies, RomaniaCharles Darwin’s prediction from 1859, that future psychology was going to be built on principles derived from evolutionary theory came at last to be fulfilled. Nowadays, there are at least four disciplines that attempt to explain human behaviours as evolutionary adaptations (or maladaptations) to the natural and/or social environment: human sociobiology, human behavioural ecology, evolutionary psychology, memetics and gene–culture coevolution theory (in our view, the most adequate of all). According to gene–culture coevolution theory, articulated language was the singular phenomenon that permitted humans to become a cultural species, and from that moment on culture become itself a selection factor. Culture means transmission of information from one generation to the next and learning from other individuals’ experiences, trough language. So, it is of critical importance to have good criteria for the selection of those individuals from whom we should learn. Yet when humans also choose their leaders from among those role-models, according to the same criteria, this mechanism can become a maladaptation and the result can be toxic leadership.http://mer.ase.ro/files/2016-2/13.pdfhuman sociobiologyhuman behavioural ecologyevolutionary psychologymemeticsgene–culture coevolution theorydominance statusprestige statustoxic leadership |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lucia Ovidia VREJA Sergiu BALAN Loredana Cornelia BOSCA |
spellingShingle |
Lucia Ovidia VREJA Sergiu BALAN Loredana Cornelia BOSCA An Evolutionary Perspective on Toxic Leadership Management and Economics Review human sociobiology human behavioural ecology evolutionary psychology memetics gene–culture coevolution theory dominance status prestige status toxic leadership |
author_facet |
Lucia Ovidia VREJA Sergiu BALAN Loredana Cornelia BOSCA |
author_sort |
Lucia Ovidia VREJA |
title |
An Evolutionary Perspective on Toxic Leadership |
title_short |
An Evolutionary Perspective on Toxic Leadership |
title_full |
An Evolutionary Perspective on Toxic Leadership |
title_fullStr |
An Evolutionary Perspective on Toxic Leadership |
title_full_unstemmed |
An Evolutionary Perspective on Toxic Leadership |
title_sort |
evolutionary perspective on toxic leadership |
publisher |
Editura ASE |
series |
Management and Economics Review |
issn |
2501-885X 2501-885X |
publishDate |
2016-12-01 |
description |
Charles Darwin’s prediction from 1859, that future psychology was going to be built on principles derived from evolutionary theory came at last to be fulfilled. Nowadays, there are at least four disciplines that attempt to explain human behaviours as evolutionary adaptations (or maladaptations) to the natural and/or social environment: human sociobiology, human behavioural ecology, evolutionary psychology, memetics and gene–culture coevolution theory (in our view, the most adequate of all). According to gene–culture coevolution theory, articulated language was the singular phenomenon that permitted humans to become a cultural species, and from that moment on culture become itself a selection factor. Culture means transmission of information from one generation to the next and learning from other individuals’ experiences, trough language. So, it is of critical importance to have good criteria for the selection of those individuals from whom we should learn. Yet when humans also choose their leaders from among those role-models, according to the same criteria, this mechanism can become a maladaptation and the result can be toxic leadership. |
topic |
human sociobiology human behavioural ecology evolutionary psychology memetics gene–culture coevolution theory dominance status prestige status toxic leadership |
url |
http://mer.ase.ro/files/2016-2/13.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT luciaovidiavreja anevolutionaryperspectiveontoxicleadership AT sergiubalan anevolutionaryperspectiveontoxicleadership AT loredanacorneliabosca anevolutionaryperspectiveontoxicleadership AT luciaovidiavreja evolutionaryperspectiveontoxicleadership AT sergiubalan evolutionaryperspectiveontoxicleadership AT loredanacorneliabosca evolutionaryperspectiveontoxicleadership |
_version_ |
1725496966325993472 |