Response of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP)-Steel Hybrid Reinforcing Bar in Uniaxial Tension

Abstract This study introduces a glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP)-steel hybrid bar with a core of a deformed steel bar (steel core). Six types of the hybrid cross section were considered, and a total of 48 tensile specimens were tested by the uniaxial tensile test to measure the tensile strengt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Minkwan Ju, Sangyun Lee, Cheolwoo Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2017-12-01
Series:International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40069-017-0212-9
id doaj-e7a22ec2493945508a99a2cc4de7e76b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e7a22ec2493945508a99a2cc4de7e76b2020-11-24T23:28:52ZengSpringerOpenInternational Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials1976-04852234-13152017-12-0111467768610.1007/s40069-017-0212-9Response of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP)-Steel Hybrid Reinforcing Bar in Uniaxial TensionMinkwan Ju0Sangyun Lee1Cheolwoo Park2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei UniversityKorea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building TechnologyDepartment of Civil Engineering, Kangwon National UniversityAbstract This study introduces a glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP)-steel hybrid bar with a core of a deformed steel bar (steel core). Six types of the hybrid cross section were considered, and a total of 48 tensile specimens were tested by the uniaxial tensile test to measure the tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of the GFRP hybrid bar. The results of the uniaxial tensile test revealed that the GFRP hybrid bar showed higher modulus of elasticity and lesser ultimate tensile strength than those shown by a normal GFRP bar. The stress–strain relationship showed a bi-linear behavior indicating good ductility against the brittle failure of a normal GFRP bar. Among all the steel core having a diameter of 19.1 mm, the bar with a core diameter of 9.53 mm exhibited the highest tangent modulus of elasticity. A tensile stress–strain model was suggested for the GFRP hybrid bar having an outer diameter of 19.1 mm and a core diameter of 9.53 mm. This was in good agreement with the experimental results. The suggested stress–strain model can be applied for structural design or analysis of concrete structures such as bridge deck slabs.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40069-017-0212-9GFRP- and deformed steel hybrid barsmodulus of elasticitydurabilityuniaxial tensile teststress–strain model
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Minkwan Ju
Sangyun Lee
Cheolwoo Park
spellingShingle Minkwan Ju
Sangyun Lee
Cheolwoo Park
Response of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP)-Steel Hybrid Reinforcing Bar in Uniaxial Tension
International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials
GFRP- and deformed steel hybrid bars
modulus of elasticity
durability
uniaxial tensile test
stress–strain model
author_facet Minkwan Ju
Sangyun Lee
Cheolwoo Park
author_sort Minkwan Ju
title Response of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP)-Steel Hybrid Reinforcing Bar in Uniaxial Tension
title_short Response of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP)-Steel Hybrid Reinforcing Bar in Uniaxial Tension
title_full Response of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP)-Steel Hybrid Reinforcing Bar in Uniaxial Tension
title_fullStr Response of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP)-Steel Hybrid Reinforcing Bar in Uniaxial Tension
title_full_unstemmed Response of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP)-Steel Hybrid Reinforcing Bar in Uniaxial Tension
title_sort response of glass fiber reinforced polymer (gfrp)-steel hybrid reinforcing bar in uniaxial tension
publisher SpringerOpen
series International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials
issn 1976-0485
2234-1315
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Abstract This study introduces a glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP)-steel hybrid bar with a core of a deformed steel bar (steel core). Six types of the hybrid cross section were considered, and a total of 48 tensile specimens were tested by the uniaxial tensile test to measure the tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of the GFRP hybrid bar. The results of the uniaxial tensile test revealed that the GFRP hybrid bar showed higher modulus of elasticity and lesser ultimate tensile strength than those shown by a normal GFRP bar. The stress–strain relationship showed a bi-linear behavior indicating good ductility against the brittle failure of a normal GFRP bar. Among all the steel core having a diameter of 19.1 mm, the bar with a core diameter of 9.53 mm exhibited the highest tangent modulus of elasticity. A tensile stress–strain model was suggested for the GFRP hybrid bar having an outer diameter of 19.1 mm and a core diameter of 9.53 mm. This was in good agreement with the experimental results. The suggested stress–strain model can be applied for structural design or analysis of concrete structures such as bridge deck slabs.
topic GFRP- and deformed steel hybrid bars
modulus of elasticity
durability
uniaxial tensile test
stress–strain model
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40069-017-0212-9
work_keys_str_mv AT minkwanju responseofglassfiberreinforcedpolymergfrpsteelhybridreinforcingbarinuniaxialtension
AT sangyunlee responseofglassfiberreinforcedpolymergfrpsteelhybridreinforcingbarinuniaxialtension
AT cheolwoopark responseofglassfiberreinforcedpolymergfrpsteelhybridreinforcingbarinuniaxialtension
_version_ 1725547535527837696