Snow albedo sensitivity to macroscopic surface roughness using a new ray-tracing model

• Main Authors: F. Larue, G. Picard, L. Arnaud, I. Ollivier, C. Delcourt, M. Lamare, F. Tuzet, J. Revuelto, M. Dumont
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Copernicus Publications 2020-05-01
• Series: The Cryosphere
• Online Access: https://www.the-cryosphere.net/14/1651/2020/tc-14-1651-2020.pdf

<p>Most models simulating snow albedo assume a flat and smooth surface, neglecting surface roughness. However, the presence of macroscopic roughness leads to a systematic decrease in albedo due to two effects: (1) photons are trapped in concavities (multiple reflection effect) and (2) when the sun is low, the roughness sides facing the sun experience an overall decrease in the local incidence angle relative to a smooth surface, promoting higher absorption, whilst the other sides have weak contributions because of the increased incidence angle or because they are shadowed (called the effective-angle effect here). This paper aims to quantify the impact of surface roughness on albedo and to assess the respective role of these two effects, with (1) observations over varying amounts of surface roughness and (2) simulations using the new rough surface ray-tracing (RSRT) model, based on a Monte Carlo method for photon transport calculation.</p> <p>The observations include spectral albedo (400–1050&thinsp;nm) over manually created roughness surfaces with multiple geometrical characteristics. Measurements highlight that even a low fraction of surface roughness features (7&thinsp;% of the surface) causes an albedo decrease of 0.02 at 1000&thinsp;nm when the solar zenith angle (<span class="inline-formula"><i>θ</i>_s</span>) is larger than 50<span class="inline-formula">^∘</span>. For higher fractions (13&thinsp;%, 27&thinsp;% and 63&thinsp;%), and when the roughness orientation is perpendicular to the sun, the decrease is of 0.03–0.04 at 700&thinsp;nm and of 0.06–0.10 at 1000&thinsp;nm. The impact is 20&thinsp;% lower when roughness orientation is parallel to the sun. The observations are subsequently compared to RSRT simulations. Accounting for surface roughness improves the model observation agreement by a factor of 2 at 700 and 1000&thinsp;nm (errors of 0.03 and 0.04, respectively) compared to simulations considering a flat smooth surface. The model is used to explore the albedo sensitivity to surface roughness with varying snow properties and illumination conditions. Both multiple reflections and the effective-angle effect have a greater impact with low specific surface area (SSA; <span class="inline-formula">&lt;10</span>&thinsp;m<span class="inline-formula">²</span>&thinsp;kg<span class="inline-formula">⁻¹</span>). The effective-angle effect also increases rapidly with <span class="inline-formula"><i>θ</i>_s</span> at large <span class="inline-formula"><i>θ</i>_s</span>. This latter effect is larger when the overall slope of the surface is facing away from the sun and has a roughness orientation perpendicular to the sun.</p> <p>For a snowpack where artificial surface roughness features were created, we showed that a broadband albedo decrease of 0.05 may cause an increase in the net shortwave radiation of 80&thinsp;% (from 15 to 27&thinsp;W&thinsp;m<span class="inline-formula">⁻²</span>). This paper highlights the necessity of considering surface roughness in the estimation of the surface energy budget and opens the way for considering natural rough surfaces in snow modelling.</p>