Evaluating cloud properties in an ensemble of regional online coupled models against satellite observations

<p>Online coupled meteorology–chemistry models permit the description of the aerosol–radiation (ARI) and aerosol–cloud interactions (ACIs). The aim of this work is to assess the representation of several cloud properties in regional-scale coupled models when simulating the climate–chemistr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R. Baró, P. Jiménez-Guerrero, M. Stengel, D. Brunner, G. Curci, R. Forkel, L. Neal, L. Palacios-Peña, N. Savage, M. Schaap, P. Tuccella, H. Denier van der Gon, S. Galmarini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018-10-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/18/15183/2018/acp-18-15183-2018.pdf
id doaj-e782ea4750604353a8e8338923911096
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e782ea4750604353a8e83389239110962020-11-25T00:43:22ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242018-10-0118151831519910.5194/acp-18-15183-2018Evaluating cloud properties in an ensemble of regional online coupled models against satellite observationsR. Baró0R. Baró1P. Jiménez-Guerrero2M. Stengel3D. Brunner4G. Curci5G. Curci6R. Forkel7L. Neal8L. Palacios-Peña9N. Savage10M. Schaap11P. Tuccella12P. Tuccella13H. Denier van der Gon14S. Galmarini15Department of Physics, Regional Campus of International Excellence Campus Mare Nostrum, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spainnow at: Section Chemical Weather Forecasts, Division Data/Methods/Modelling, ZAMG – Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik, Vienna, AustriaDepartment of Physics, Regional Campus of International Excellence Campus Mare Nostrum, University of Murcia, Murcia, SpainDeutscher Wetterdienst (DWD) Frankfurter Str. 135, Offenbach, GermanyLaboratory for Air Pollution and Environmental Technology, Empa, Dübendorf, SwitzerlandDepartment of Physical and Chemical Sciences, University L'Aquila, L'Aquila (AQ), ItalyCenter of Excellence in Telesening of Environment and Model Prediction of Severe Events (CETEMPS), University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila (AQ), ItalyKarlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), Institut für Meteorologie und Klimaforschung, Atmosphärische Umweltforschung (IMK-IFU), Karlsruhe, GermanyMet Office, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UKDepartment of Physics, Regional Campus of International Excellence Campus Mare Nostrum, University of Murcia, Murcia, SpainMet Office, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UKNetherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Utrecht, the NetherlandsDepartment of Physical and Chemical Sciences, University L'Aquila, L'Aquila (AQ), ItalyCenter of Excellence in Telesening of Environment and Model Prediction of Severe Events (CETEMPS), University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila (AQ), ItalyNetherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Utrecht, the NetherlandsEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate for Energy, Transport and Climate, Air and Climate Unit, Ispra (VA), Italy<p>Online coupled meteorology–chemistry models permit the description of the aerosol–radiation (ARI) and aerosol–cloud interactions (ACIs). The aim of this work is to assess the representation of several cloud properties in regional-scale coupled models when simulating the climate–chemistry–cloud–radiation system. The evaluated simulations are performed under the umbrella of the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII) Phase 2 and include ARI+ACI interactions. Model simulations are evaluated against observational data from the European Space Agency (ESA) Cloud_cci project. The results show an underestimation (overestimation) of cloud fraction (CF) over land (sea) areas by the models. Lower bias values are found in the ensemble mean. Cloud optical depth (COD) and cloud ice water path (IWP) are generally underestimated over the whole European domain. The cloud liquid water path (LWP) is broadly overestimated. The temporal correlation suggests a generally positive correlation between models and satellite observations. Finally, CF gives the best spatial variability representation, whereas COD, IWP, and LWP show less capacity. The differences found can be attributed to differences in the microphysics schemes used; for instance, the number of ice hydrometeors and the prognostic/diagnostic treatment of the LWP are relevant.</p>https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/18/15183/2018/acp-18-15183-2018.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author R. Baró
R. Baró
P. Jiménez-Guerrero
M. Stengel
D. Brunner
G. Curci
G. Curci
R. Forkel
L. Neal
L. Palacios-Peña
N. Savage
M. Schaap
P. Tuccella
P. Tuccella
H. Denier van der Gon
S. Galmarini
spellingShingle R. Baró
R. Baró
P. Jiménez-Guerrero
M. Stengel
D. Brunner
G. Curci
G. Curci
R. Forkel
L. Neal
L. Palacios-Peña
N. Savage
M. Schaap
P. Tuccella
P. Tuccella
H. Denier van der Gon
S. Galmarini
Evaluating cloud properties in an ensemble of regional online coupled models against satellite observations
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
author_facet R. Baró
R. Baró
P. Jiménez-Guerrero
M. Stengel
D. Brunner
G. Curci
G. Curci
R. Forkel
L. Neal
L. Palacios-Peña
N. Savage
M. Schaap
P. Tuccella
P. Tuccella
H. Denier van der Gon
S. Galmarini
author_sort R. Baró
title Evaluating cloud properties in an ensemble of regional online coupled models against satellite observations
title_short Evaluating cloud properties in an ensemble of regional online coupled models against satellite observations
title_full Evaluating cloud properties in an ensemble of regional online coupled models against satellite observations
title_fullStr Evaluating cloud properties in an ensemble of regional online coupled models against satellite observations
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating cloud properties in an ensemble of regional online coupled models against satellite observations
title_sort evaluating cloud properties in an ensemble of regional online coupled models against satellite observations
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
publishDate 2018-10-01
description <p>Online coupled meteorology–chemistry models permit the description of the aerosol–radiation (ARI) and aerosol–cloud interactions (ACIs). The aim of this work is to assess the representation of several cloud properties in regional-scale coupled models when simulating the climate–chemistry–cloud–radiation system. The evaluated simulations are performed under the umbrella of the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII) Phase 2 and include ARI+ACI interactions. Model simulations are evaluated against observational data from the European Space Agency (ESA) Cloud_cci project. The results show an underestimation (overestimation) of cloud fraction (CF) over land (sea) areas by the models. Lower bias values are found in the ensemble mean. Cloud optical depth (COD) and cloud ice water path (IWP) are generally underestimated over the whole European domain. The cloud liquid water path (LWP) is broadly overestimated. The temporal correlation suggests a generally positive correlation between models and satellite observations. Finally, CF gives the best spatial variability representation, whereas COD, IWP, and LWP show less capacity. The differences found can be attributed to differences in the microphysics schemes used; for instance, the number of ice hydrometeors and the prognostic/diagnostic treatment of the LWP are relevant.</p>
url https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/18/15183/2018/acp-18-15183-2018.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT rbaro evaluatingcloudpropertiesinanensembleofregionalonlinecoupledmodelsagainstsatelliteobservations
AT rbaro evaluatingcloudpropertiesinanensembleofregionalonlinecoupledmodelsagainstsatelliteobservations
AT pjimenezguerrero evaluatingcloudpropertiesinanensembleofregionalonlinecoupledmodelsagainstsatelliteobservations
AT mstengel evaluatingcloudpropertiesinanensembleofregionalonlinecoupledmodelsagainstsatelliteobservations
AT dbrunner evaluatingcloudpropertiesinanensembleofregionalonlinecoupledmodelsagainstsatelliteobservations
AT gcurci evaluatingcloudpropertiesinanensembleofregionalonlinecoupledmodelsagainstsatelliteobservations
AT gcurci evaluatingcloudpropertiesinanensembleofregionalonlinecoupledmodelsagainstsatelliteobservations
AT rforkel evaluatingcloudpropertiesinanensembleofregionalonlinecoupledmodelsagainstsatelliteobservations
AT lneal evaluatingcloudpropertiesinanensembleofregionalonlinecoupledmodelsagainstsatelliteobservations
AT lpalaciospena evaluatingcloudpropertiesinanensembleofregionalonlinecoupledmodelsagainstsatelliteobservations
AT nsavage evaluatingcloudpropertiesinanensembleofregionalonlinecoupledmodelsagainstsatelliteobservations
AT mschaap evaluatingcloudpropertiesinanensembleofregionalonlinecoupledmodelsagainstsatelliteobservations
AT ptuccella evaluatingcloudpropertiesinanensembleofregionalonlinecoupledmodelsagainstsatelliteobservations
AT ptuccella evaluatingcloudpropertiesinanensembleofregionalonlinecoupledmodelsagainstsatelliteobservations
AT hdeniervandergon evaluatingcloudpropertiesinanensembleofregionalonlinecoupledmodelsagainstsatelliteobservations
AT sgalmarini evaluatingcloudpropertiesinanensembleofregionalonlinecoupledmodelsagainstsatelliteobservations
_version_ 1725278765130448896