Comparative Evaluation of Immediate Post-Operative Sequelae after Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar with or without Tube Drain - Split-Mouth Study
Introduction: Third molar surgery is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in general dentistry. Postoperative variables such as pain, swelling and trismus are major concerns after impacted mandibular third molar surgery. Use of passive tube drain is supposed to help reduce these i...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
2016-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/9054/20951_CE[NE]_F(Sh)_PF1(VSUAK)_PFA(AK)_PF2(EKAK).pdf |
Summary: | Introduction: Third molar surgery is one of the most common
surgical procedures performed in general dentistry. Postoperative variables such as pain, swelling and trismus are major
concerns after impacted mandibular third molar surgery. Use of
passive tube drain is supposed to help reduce these immediate
post-operative sequelae. The current study was designed to
compare the effect of tube drain on immediate post-operative
sequelae following impacted mandibular third molar surgery.
Aim: To compare the post-operative sequelae after surgical
removal of impacted mandibular third molar surgery with or
without tube drain.
Materials and Methods: Thirty patients with bilateral impacted
mandibular third molars were divided into two groups: Test (with
tube drain) and control (without tube drain) group. In the test
group, a tube drain was inserted through the releasing incision,
and kept in place for three days. The control group was left
without a tube drain. The post-operative variables like, pain,
swelling, and trismus were calculated after 24 hours, 72 hours,
7 days, and 15 days in both the groups and analyzed statistically
using chi-square and t-test analysis.
Results: The test group showed lesser swelling as compared
to control group, with the swelling variable showing statistically
significant difference at post-operative day 3 and 7 (p≤ 0.05) in
both groups. There were no statistically significant differences
in pain and trismus variables in both the groups.
Conclusion: The use of tube drain helps to control swelling
following impacted mandibular third molar surgery. However, it
does not have much effect on pain or trismus. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2249-782X 0973-709X |