The first Swedish Read & Publish agreement: An evaluation of the Springer Compact pilot
In this paper we summarise the lessons learned from the first Swedish Read & Publish agreement: Springer Compact with Springer Nature (2016-07-01 – 2018-12-31). We set out to put the Swedish agreement in an international context and to examine the effects of the agreement regarding economy, publ...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
openjournals.nl
2020-07-01
|
Series: | Liber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://test.openjournals.nl/liberquarterly/article/view/10743 |
id |
doaj-e7626efa51a14d07adb8e848a8c298fe |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e7626efa51a14d07adb8e848a8c298fe2021-09-30T14:10:52Zengopenjournals.nlLiber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries2213-056X2020-07-01301The first Swedish Read & Publish agreement: An evaluation of the Springer Compact pilotLisa Olsson0Helena Francke1Camilla Hertil Lindelöw2Niklas Willén3National library of SwedenUniversity of BoråsNational library of SwedenUppsala UniversityIn this paper we summarise the lessons learned from the first Swedish Read & Publish agreement: Springer Compact with Springer Nature (2016-07-01 – 2018-12-31). We set out to put the Swedish agreement in an international context and to examine the effects of the agreement regarding economy, publication outcome, administration and researchers’ attitudes and practices in Sweden. Publication data, economic data, as well as survey data from administrative staff and corresponding authors were collected and analysed. Based on the analyses, the advantages and disadvantages of Read & Publish agreements are discussed. The advantages include increase in OA publishing, improved OA workflows and ease for researchers. The disadvantages include the risk of conserving the current system and its associated high costs.https://test.openjournals.nl/liberquarterly/article/view/10743open accessspringer compactevaluationbig dealsread and publish |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lisa Olsson Helena Francke Camilla Hertil Lindelöw Niklas Willén |
spellingShingle |
Lisa Olsson Helena Francke Camilla Hertil Lindelöw Niklas Willén The first Swedish Read & Publish agreement: An evaluation of the Springer Compact pilot Liber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries open access springer compact evaluation big deals read and publish |
author_facet |
Lisa Olsson Helena Francke Camilla Hertil Lindelöw Niklas Willén |
author_sort |
Lisa Olsson |
title |
The first Swedish Read & Publish agreement: An evaluation of the Springer Compact pilot |
title_short |
The first Swedish Read & Publish agreement: An evaluation of the Springer Compact pilot |
title_full |
The first Swedish Read & Publish agreement: An evaluation of the Springer Compact pilot |
title_fullStr |
The first Swedish Read & Publish agreement: An evaluation of the Springer Compact pilot |
title_full_unstemmed |
The first Swedish Read & Publish agreement: An evaluation of the Springer Compact pilot |
title_sort |
first swedish read & publish agreement: an evaluation of the springer compact pilot |
publisher |
openjournals.nl |
series |
Liber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries |
issn |
2213-056X |
publishDate |
2020-07-01 |
description |
In this paper we summarise the lessons learned from the first Swedish Read & Publish agreement: Springer Compact with Springer Nature (2016-07-01 – 2018-12-31). We set out to put the Swedish agreement in an international context and to examine the effects of the agreement regarding economy, publication outcome, administration and researchers’ attitudes and practices in Sweden. Publication data, economic data, as well as survey data from administrative staff and corresponding authors were collected and analysed. Based on the analyses, the advantages and disadvantages of Read & Publish agreements are discussed. The advantages include increase in OA publishing, improved OA workflows and ease for researchers. The disadvantages include the risk of conserving the current system and its associated high costs. |
topic |
open access springer compact evaluation big deals read and publish |
url |
https://test.openjournals.nl/liberquarterly/article/view/10743 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lisaolsson thefirstswedishreadpublishagreementanevaluationofthespringercompactpilot AT helenafrancke thefirstswedishreadpublishagreementanevaluationofthespringercompactpilot AT camillahertillindelow thefirstswedishreadpublishagreementanevaluationofthespringercompactpilot AT niklaswillen thefirstswedishreadpublishagreementanevaluationofthespringercompactpilot AT lisaolsson firstswedishreadpublishagreementanevaluationofthespringercompactpilot AT helenafrancke firstswedishreadpublishagreementanevaluationofthespringercompactpilot AT camillahertillindelow firstswedishreadpublishagreementanevaluationofthespringercompactpilot AT niklaswillen firstswedishreadpublishagreementanevaluationofthespringercompactpilot |
_version_ |
1716863126875406336 |