The Iranian version of theory-based intention for cesarean section (IR-TBICS) scale: development and first evaluation

Abstract Background The rate at which mothers experience a cesarean section in the absence of medical signs is growing worldwide. Women’s beliefs and intentions play an essential role in the request or choice of a delivery method. At present, there is no comprehensive, validated scale for assessing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seyed Abolhassan Naghibi, Maryam Khazaee-Pool, Mahmood Moosazadeh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-01-01
Series:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03498-3
id doaj-e761aa8815dc4e90865346fc339f227a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e761aa8815dc4e90865346fc339f227a2021-01-10T12:26:14ZengBMCBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1471-23932021-01-0121111110.1186/s12884-020-03498-3The Iranian version of theory-based intention for cesarean section (IR-TBICS) scale: development and first evaluationSeyed Abolhassan Naghibi0Maryam Khazaee-Pool1Mahmood Moosazadeh2Department of Public Health, School of Health, Mazandaran University of Medical SciencesDepartment of Public Health, School of Health, Mazandaran University of Medical SciencesHealth Sciences Research Center, Addiction Research Institutes, Mazandaran University of Medical SciencesAbstract Background The rate at which mothers experience a cesarean section in the absence of medical signs is growing worldwide. Women’s beliefs and intentions play an essential role in the request or choice of a delivery method. At present, there is no comprehensive, validated scale for assessing pregnant women’s beliefs about cesarean section in the Iranian population. This study was performed to develop and assess the validity and reliability of the intention-based cesarean section scale using the theory of reasoned action (TRA) constructs as a theoretical framework for measuring intention toward the selection of a delivery method. Methods In this cross-sectional validation study, 480 pregnant women were recruited from Sari, in northern Iran, through a multistage random sampling approach. Content validity was examined using the content validity index (CVI) and content validity ratio (CVR). Furthermore, both exploratory factor analyses (EFA) and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were applied to assess the construct validity of the developed scale. Reliability was measured by internal consistency and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Quality criteria for floor and ceiling effects were derived from existing guidelines and consensus within our research group. Results The results obtained from the factor analysis showed that the data were fit to the model (χ2 = 2298.389, P < 0.001). The TRA comprised 24 items assessing five domains, which described 62.46% of the common variance. The CFA showed a model with suitable fitness for the data. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the domains of the scale ranged from 0.609 to 0.843, and the ICC value ranged from 0.71 to 0.84, which is within the satisfactory range. The IR-TBICS scale had no floor or ceiling effect on the total score or any of the dimensions. Conclusions The belief-based cesarean section scale appears to be a reliable instrument. It is considered suitable and can be applied in other research in Iran.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03498-3Cesarean sectionIntentionScale developmentPsychometricsPregnant women
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Seyed Abolhassan Naghibi
Maryam Khazaee-Pool
Mahmood Moosazadeh
spellingShingle Seyed Abolhassan Naghibi
Maryam Khazaee-Pool
Mahmood Moosazadeh
The Iranian version of theory-based intention for cesarean section (IR-TBICS) scale: development and first evaluation
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Cesarean section
Intention
Scale development
Psychometrics
Pregnant women
author_facet Seyed Abolhassan Naghibi
Maryam Khazaee-Pool
Mahmood Moosazadeh
author_sort Seyed Abolhassan Naghibi
title The Iranian version of theory-based intention for cesarean section (IR-TBICS) scale: development and first evaluation
title_short The Iranian version of theory-based intention for cesarean section (IR-TBICS) scale: development and first evaluation
title_full The Iranian version of theory-based intention for cesarean section (IR-TBICS) scale: development and first evaluation
title_fullStr The Iranian version of theory-based intention for cesarean section (IR-TBICS) scale: development and first evaluation
title_full_unstemmed The Iranian version of theory-based intention for cesarean section (IR-TBICS) scale: development and first evaluation
title_sort iranian version of theory-based intention for cesarean section (ir-tbics) scale: development and first evaluation
publisher BMC
series BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
issn 1471-2393
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Abstract Background The rate at which mothers experience a cesarean section in the absence of medical signs is growing worldwide. Women’s beliefs and intentions play an essential role in the request or choice of a delivery method. At present, there is no comprehensive, validated scale for assessing pregnant women’s beliefs about cesarean section in the Iranian population. This study was performed to develop and assess the validity and reliability of the intention-based cesarean section scale using the theory of reasoned action (TRA) constructs as a theoretical framework for measuring intention toward the selection of a delivery method. Methods In this cross-sectional validation study, 480 pregnant women were recruited from Sari, in northern Iran, through a multistage random sampling approach. Content validity was examined using the content validity index (CVI) and content validity ratio (CVR). Furthermore, both exploratory factor analyses (EFA) and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were applied to assess the construct validity of the developed scale. Reliability was measured by internal consistency and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Quality criteria for floor and ceiling effects were derived from existing guidelines and consensus within our research group. Results The results obtained from the factor analysis showed that the data were fit to the model (χ2 = 2298.389, P < 0.001). The TRA comprised 24 items assessing five domains, which described 62.46% of the common variance. The CFA showed a model with suitable fitness for the data. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the domains of the scale ranged from 0.609 to 0.843, and the ICC value ranged from 0.71 to 0.84, which is within the satisfactory range. The IR-TBICS scale had no floor or ceiling effect on the total score or any of the dimensions. Conclusions The belief-based cesarean section scale appears to be a reliable instrument. It is considered suitable and can be applied in other research in Iran.
topic Cesarean section
Intention
Scale development
Psychometrics
Pregnant women
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03498-3
work_keys_str_mv AT seyedabolhassannaghibi theiranianversionoftheorybasedintentionforcesareansectionirtbicsscaledevelopmentandfirstevaluation
AT maryamkhazaeepool theiranianversionoftheorybasedintentionforcesareansectionirtbicsscaledevelopmentandfirstevaluation
AT mahmoodmoosazadeh theiranianversionoftheorybasedintentionforcesareansectionirtbicsscaledevelopmentandfirstevaluation
AT seyedabolhassannaghibi iranianversionoftheorybasedintentionforcesareansectionirtbicsscaledevelopmentandfirstevaluation
AT maryamkhazaeepool iranianversionoftheorybasedintentionforcesareansectionirtbicsscaledevelopmentandfirstevaluation
AT mahmoodmoosazadeh iranianversionoftheorybasedintentionforcesareansectionirtbicsscaledevelopmentandfirstevaluation
_version_ 1724342940012118016