Spatial Structure of Evolutionary Models of Dialects in Contact.

Phylogenetic models, originally developed to demonstrate evolutionary biology, have been applied to a wide range of cultural data including natural language lexicons, manuscripts, folktales, material cultures, and religions. A fundamental question regarding the application of phylogenetic inference...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yugo Murawaki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4519344?pdf=render
id doaj-e761a356019a4e7c9afeaef545165be2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e761a356019a4e7c9afeaef545165be22020-11-24T21:34:41ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01107e013433510.1371/journal.pone.0134335Spatial Structure of Evolutionary Models of Dialects in Contact.Yugo MurawakiPhylogenetic models, originally developed to demonstrate evolutionary biology, have been applied to a wide range of cultural data including natural language lexicons, manuscripts, folktales, material cultures, and religions. A fundamental question regarding the application of phylogenetic inference is whether trees are an appropriate approximation of cultural evolutionary history. Their validity in cultural applications has been scrutinized, particularly with respect to the lexicons of dialects in contact. Phylogenetic models organize evolutionary data into a series of branching events through time. However, branching events are typically not included in dialectological studies to interpret the distributions of lexical terms. Instead, dialectologists have offered spatial interpretations to represent lexical data. For example, new lexical items that emerge in a politico-cultural center are likely to spread to peripheries, but not vice versa. To explore the question of the tree model's validity, we present a simple simulation model in which dialects form a spatial network and share lexical items through contact rather than through common ancestors. We input several network topologies to the model to generate synthetic data. We then analyze the synthesized data using conventional phylogenetic techniques. We found that a group of dialects can be considered tree-like even if it has not evolved in a temporally tree-like manner but has a temporally invariant, spatially tree-like structure. In addition, the simulation experiments appear to reproduce unnatural results observed in reconstructed trees for real data. These results motivate further investigation into the spatial structure of the evolutionary history of dialect lexicons as well as other cultural characteristics.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4519344?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yugo Murawaki
spellingShingle Yugo Murawaki
Spatial Structure of Evolutionary Models of Dialects in Contact.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Yugo Murawaki
author_sort Yugo Murawaki
title Spatial Structure of Evolutionary Models of Dialects in Contact.
title_short Spatial Structure of Evolutionary Models of Dialects in Contact.
title_full Spatial Structure of Evolutionary Models of Dialects in Contact.
title_fullStr Spatial Structure of Evolutionary Models of Dialects in Contact.
title_full_unstemmed Spatial Structure of Evolutionary Models of Dialects in Contact.
title_sort spatial structure of evolutionary models of dialects in contact.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Phylogenetic models, originally developed to demonstrate evolutionary biology, have been applied to a wide range of cultural data including natural language lexicons, manuscripts, folktales, material cultures, and religions. A fundamental question regarding the application of phylogenetic inference is whether trees are an appropriate approximation of cultural evolutionary history. Their validity in cultural applications has been scrutinized, particularly with respect to the lexicons of dialects in contact. Phylogenetic models organize evolutionary data into a series of branching events through time. However, branching events are typically not included in dialectological studies to interpret the distributions of lexical terms. Instead, dialectologists have offered spatial interpretations to represent lexical data. For example, new lexical items that emerge in a politico-cultural center are likely to spread to peripheries, but not vice versa. To explore the question of the tree model's validity, we present a simple simulation model in which dialects form a spatial network and share lexical items through contact rather than through common ancestors. We input several network topologies to the model to generate synthetic data. We then analyze the synthesized data using conventional phylogenetic techniques. We found that a group of dialects can be considered tree-like even if it has not evolved in a temporally tree-like manner but has a temporally invariant, spatially tree-like structure. In addition, the simulation experiments appear to reproduce unnatural results observed in reconstructed trees for real data. These results motivate further investigation into the spatial structure of the evolutionary history of dialect lexicons as well as other cultural characteristics.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4519344?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT yugomurawaki spatialstructureofevolutionarymodelsofdialectsincontact
_version_ 1725948109346832384