Cross flow microfiltration of oil-water emulsions using clay based ceramic membrane support and TiO2 composite membrane

The main objective of this work is to study the effect of cross flow filtration conditions on the separation of oily wastewater using ceramic support and TiO2 membrane. Firstly, the low cost clay based ceramic membrane support was prepared by uniaxial compaction method using combination of pyrophyll...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kanchapogu Suresh, G. Pugazhenthi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-09-01
Series:Egyptian Journal of Petroleum
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110062116300708
id doaj-e750b20409744e49983aa6c69a87d0dc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e750b20409744e49983aa6c69a87d0dc2020-11-24T22:39:00ZengElsevierEgyptian Journal of Petroleum1110-06212017-09-0126367969410.1016/j.ejpe.2016.10.007Cross flow microfiltration of oil-water emulsions using clay based ceramic membrane support and TiO2 composite membraneKanchapogu SureshG. PugazhenthiThe main objective of this work is to study the effect of cross flow filtration conditions on the separation of oily wastewater using ceramic support and TiO2 membrane. Firstly, the low cost clay based ceramic membrane support was prepared by uniaxial compaction method using combination of pyrophyllite, quartz, feldspar, kaolin, ball clay and calcium carbonate along with PVA as a binder. Subsequently, TiO2 composite membrane was fabricated via hydrothermal route employing TiO2 sol derived from TiCl4 and NH4OH solution. Cross flow microfiltration investigations were carried out by utilizing oil-water emulsion concentration of 200 mg/L at three distinct applied pressures (69–207 kPa) and three cross flow velocities (0.0885, 0.1327, and 0.1769 m/s). Compared to ceramic support, TiO2 composite membrane demonstrates better performance in terms of flux and removal efficiency of oil and also the rate of flux decline during filtration operation is lower due to highly hydrophilic surface of the TiO2 membrane. TiO2 membrane displays the oil removal efficiency of 99% in the entire range of applied pressures investigation, while ceramic support shows 93–96% of oil removal.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110062116300708Ceramic supportTiO2Composite membraneMicrofiltrationOil-water emulsions
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kanchapogu Suresh
G. Pugazhenthi
spellingShingle Kanchapogu Suresh
G. Pugazhenthi
Cross flow microfiltration of oil-water emulsions using clay based ceramic membrane support and TiO2 composite membrane
Egyptian Journal of Petroleum
Ceramic support
TiO2
Composite membrane
Microfiltration
Oil-water emulsions
author_facet Kanchapogu Suresh
G. Pugazhenthi
author_sort Kanchapogu Suresh
title Cross flow microfiltration of oil-water emulsions using clay based ceramic membrane support and TiO2 composite membrane
title_short Cross flow microfiltration of oil-water emulsions using clay based ceramic membrane support and TiO2 composite membrane
title_full Cross flow microfiltration of oil-water emulsions using clay based ceramic membrane support and TiO2 composite membrane
title_fullStr Cross flow microfiltration of oil-water emulsions using clay based ceramic membrane support and TiO2 composite membrane
title_full_unstemmed Cross flow microfiltration of oil-water emulsions using clay based ceramic membrane support and TiO2 composite membrane
title_sort cross flow microfiltration of oil-water emulsions using clay based ceramic membrane support and tio2 composite membrane
publisher Elsevier
series Egyptian Journal of Petroleum
issn 1110-0621
publishDate 2017-09-01
description The main objective of this work is to study the effect of cross flow filtration conditions on the separation of oily wastewater using ceramic support and TiO2 membrane. Firstly, the low cost clay based ceramic membrane support was prepared by uniaxial compaction method using combination of pyrophyllite, quartz, feldspar, kaolin, ball clay and calcium carbonate along with PVA as a binder. Subsequently, TiO2 composite membrane was fabricated via hydrothermal route employing TiO2 sol derived from TiCl4 and NH4OH solution. Cross flow microfiltration investigations were carried out by utilizing oil-water emulsion concentration of 200 mg/L at three distinct applied pressures (69–207 kPa) and three cross flow velocities (0.0885, 0.1327, and 0.1769 m/s). Compared to ceramic support, TiO2 composite membrane demonstrates better performance in terms of flux and removal efficiency of oil and also the rate of flux decline during filtration operation is lower due to highly hydrophilic surface of the TiO2 membrane. TiO2 membrane displays the oil removal efficiency of 99% in the entire range of applied pressures investigation, while ceramic support shows 93–96% of oil removal.
topic Ceramic support
TiO2
Composite membrane
Microfiltration
Oil-water emulsions
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110062116300708
work_keys_str_mv AT kanchapogusuresh crossflowmicrofiltrationofoilwateremulsionsusingclaybasedceramicmembranesupportandtio2compositemembrane
AT gpugazhenthi crossflowmicrofiltrationofoilwateremulsionsusingclaybasedceramicmembranesupportandtio2compositemembrane
_version_ 1725710673709629440