SenseWear Armband and Stroke: Validity of Energy Expenditure and Step Count Measurement during Walking

The purpose of this study was to test the validity of the SenseWear Pro Armband (SWA) for the measurement of energy expenditure (EE) and step count against a criterion in persons with stroke. Twelve participants with chronic stroke (mean age 64.2±10.4 years; mean gait speed 0.67±0.25 m/sec) complete...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patricia J. Manns, Robert G. Haennel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2012-01-01
Series:Stroke Research and Treatment
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/247165
id doaj-e74b16e2bea94083ba0e88ab4fd21dcb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e74b16e2bea94083ba0e88ab4fd21dcb2021-07-02T03:10:34ZengHindawi LimitedStroke Research and Treatment2090-81052042-00562012-01-01201210.1155/2012/247165247165SenseWear Armband and Stroke: Validity of Energy Expenditure and Step Count Measurement during WalkingPatricia J. Manns0Robert G. Haennel1Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, 2-50 Corbett Hall, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G4, CanadaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, 2-50 Corbett Hall, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G4, CanadaThe purpose of this study was to test the validity of the SenseWear Pro Armband (SWA) for the measurement of energy expenditure (EE) and step count against a criterion in persons with stroke. Twelve participants with chronic stroke (mean age 64.2±10.4 years; mean gait speed 0.67±0.25 m/sec) completed two trials of a six-minute walk test, while wearing a SenseWear Armband (SWA) on each arm and being continuously monitored using a portable metabolic cart. Agreement between estimates of energy expenditure from the SWA and the metabolic cart was fair for the armband on the hemiplegic arm (intraclass correlation cefficient (ICC)=0.586) and good for the armband on the unaffected arm (ICC=0.702). Agreement between the SWA estimate of step count, and step count as measured by the Step Activity Monitor was poor (ICC<0.352), with significant underestimation by the SWA. Our results show that, for these moderately impaired persons with stroke, the SWA should be used with caution for the measurement of energy expenditure and should not be used to measure step count.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/247165
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Patricia J. Manns
Robert G. Haennel
spellingShingle Patricia J. Manns
Robert G. Haennel
SenseWear Armband and Stroke: Validity of Energy Expenditure and Step Count Measurement during Walking
Stroke Research and Treatment
author_facet Patricia J. Manns
Robert G. Haennel
author_sort Patricia J. Manns
title SenseWear Armband and Stroke: Validity of Energy Expenditure and Step Count Measurement during Walking
title_short SenseWear Armband and Stroke: Validity of Energy Expenditure and Step Count Measurement during Walking
title_full SenseWear Armband and Stroke: Validity of Energy Expenditure and Step Count Measurement during Walking
title_fullStr SenseWear Armband and Stroke: Validity of Energy Expenditure and Step Count Measurement during Walking
title_full_unstemmed SenseWear Armband and Stroke: Validity of Energy Expenditure and Step Count Measurement during Walking
title_sort sensewear armband and stroke: validity of energy expenditure and step count measurement during walking
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Stroke Research and Treatment
issn 2090-8105
2042-0056
publishDate 2012-01-01
description The purpose of this study was to test the validity of the SenseWear Pro Armband (SWA) for the measurement of energy expenditure (EE) and step count against a criterion in persons with stroke. Twelve participants with chronic stroke (mean age 64.2±10.4 years; mean gait speed 0.67±0.25 m/sec) completed two trials of a six-minute walk test, while wearing a SenseWear Armband (SWA) on each arm and being continuously monitored using a portable metabolic cart. Agreement between estimates of energy expenditure from the SWA and the metabolic cart was fair for the armband on the hemiplegic arm (intraclass correlation cefficient (ICC)=0.586) and good for the armband on the unaffected arm (ICC=0.702). Agreement between the SWA estimate of step count, and step count as measured by the Step Activity Monitor was poor (ICC<0.352), with significant underestimation by the SWA. Our results show that, for these moderately impaired persons with stroke, the SWA should be used with caution for the measurement of energy expenditure and should not be used to measure step count.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/247165
work_keys_str_mv AT patriciajmanns senseweararmbandandstrokevalidityofenergyexpenditureandstepcountmeasurementduringwalking
AT robertghaennel senseweararmbandandstrokevalidityofenergyexpenditureandstepcountmeasurementduringwalking
_version_ 1721342136466538496