Heteronormativity in Norwegian Social Work Journals

The purpose of this review was to examine whether heteronormativity is reproduced or problematized within Norwegian social work journals. It is based on a study that explored how sexuality is addressed in social work journal articles and extends past reviews by also analysing heterosexuality. The d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Merethe Giertsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 2019-05-01
Series:Critical Social Work
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/index.php/csw/article/view/5901
id doaj-e7348a49c42640bfbd39538ddf0f079c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e7348a49c42640bfbd39538ddf0f079c2020-11-25T02:19:43ZengUniversity of WindsorCritical Social Work1543-93722019-05-0117210.22329/csw.v17i2.5901Heteronormativity in Norwegian Social Work JournalsMerethe Giertsen0University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Norway The purpose of this review was to examine whether heteronormativity is reproduced or problematized within Norwegian social work journals. It is based on a study that explored how sexuality is addressed in social work journal articles and extends past reviews by also analysing heterosexuality. The data comprised of 572 articles published in the major Norwegian social work journals between 2002 and 2014. A keyword search and a thematic analysis was used to first determine how many articles addressed sexuality and second to develop a closer analysis of how sexuality was addressed in the identified articles. Queer theory guided the analysis. Findings revealed that heteronormativity was problematized in five of the six (1%) articles that addressed sexuality, indicating that heteronormativity is reproduced in Norwegian social work journals and that those in position in authority in the field of social work routinely deploy heterosexuality as a taken-for-granted resource. If power asymmetries are to be destabilized, strategies that counteract the power basis of the hegemonic norm are necessary, such as addressing the binary opposition of heterosexuality vs. non-heterosexuality, and naming heterosexuality. https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/index.php/csw/article/view/5901heteronomativitysexualitysocial workqueer theorykeyword searchthematic analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Merethe Giertsen
spellingShingle Merethe Giertsen
Heteronormativity in Norwegian Social Work Journals
Critical Social Work
heteronomativity
sexuality
social work
queer theory
keyword search
thematic analysis
author_facet Merethe Giertsen
author_sort Merethe Giertsen
title Heteronormativity in Norwegian Social Work Journals
title_short Heteronormativity in Norwegian Social Work Journals
title_full Heteronormativity in Norwegian Social Work Journals
title_fullStr Heteronormativity in Norwegian Social Work Journals
title_full_unstemmed Heteronormativity in Norwegian Social Work Journals
title_sort heteronormativity in norwegian social work journals
publisher University of Windsor
series Critical Social Work
issn 1543-9372
publishDate 2019-05-01
description The purpose of this review was to examine whether heteronormativity is reproduced or problematized within Norwegian social work journals. It is based on a study that explored how sexuality is addressed in social work journal articles and extends past reviews by also analysing heterosexuality. The data comprised of 572 articles published in the major Norwegian social work journals between 2002 and 2014. A keyword search and a thematic analysis was used to first determine how many articles addressed sexuality and second to develop a closer analysis of how sexuality was addressed in the identified articles. Queer theory guided the analysis. Findings revealed that heteronormativity was problematized in five of the six (1%) articles that addressed sexuality, indicating that heteronormativity is reproduced in Norwegian social work journals and that those in position in authority in the field of social work routinely deploy heterosexuality as a taken-for-granted resource. If power asymmetries are to be destabilized, strategies that counteract the power basis of the hegemonic norm are necessary, such as addressing the binary opposition of heterosexuality vs. non-heterosexuality, and naming heterosexuality.
topic heteronomativity
sexuality
social work
queer theory
keyword search
thematic analysis
url https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/index.php/csw/article/view/5901
work_keys_str_mv AT merethegiertsen heteronormativityinnorwegiansocialworkjournals
_version_ 1724874727146651648